Cited by 53Gastrointestinal motility and disordersNausea and vomiting managementPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Efficacy and Safety of Drugs for Gastroparesis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Open access
Ingrosso, Maria Rosa, Camilleri, Michael, Tack, Jan, Ianiro, Gianluca, Black, Christopher J., Ford, Alexander C.·2023·Gastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although there have been multiple drugs tested in gastroparesis, their relative efficacy and safety are unknown. We evaluated this in a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched the literature to September 7, 2022. We judged the efficacy of drugs based on global symptoms of gastroparesis; individual symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating, or fullness; and safety according to total adverse events and adverse events leading to withdrawal. We extracted data as intention-to-treat analyses, assuming dropouts to be treatment failures and reporting pooled relative risks (RRs) of not improving with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), ranking drugs according to P-score. RESULTS: We identified 29 RCTs (3772 patients). Based on global symptoms, clebopride ranked first for efficacy (RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P-score = .99) followed by domperidone (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.98; P-score = .76). No other drug was superior to placebo. Only 2 drug classes were efficacious: in rank order, oral dopamine antagonists (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.77; P-score = .96) and tachykinin-1 antagonists (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.93; P-score = .83). For individual symptoms, oral metoclopramide ranked first for nausea (RR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.00; P-score = .95), fullness (RR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.35-1.28; P-score = .86), and bloating (RR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.93; P-score = .97), based on only 1 small trial. Only prucalopride was more likely to be associated with adverse events than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In a network meta-analysis, oral dopamine antagonists and tachykinin-1 antagonists were more efficacious than placebo for gastroparesis, but confidence in the evidence was low to moderate for most comparisons. There is an unmet need for efficacious therapies for gastroparesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.12.014

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The selective 5‐HT4 receptor agonist prucalopride may improve nausea, early satiety, bloating, and quality of life in selected patients, though it carries gastrointestinal side effects and requires individualization.

    “The selective 5‑HT4 receptor agonist prucalopride may improve nausea, early satiety, bloating, and quality of life in selected patients, though it carries gastrointestinal side effects and requires individualization [49, 124, 125].”

    From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [124]

    The Discussion reports that prucalopride was superior to placebo in an included crossover trial, and that adverse events—mostly diarrhea—were significantly more likely with the drug. It also suggests prucalopride for patients with concomitant chronic idiopathic constipation. The paper does not establish the claimed improvements in each named symptom or in quality of life; its individual-symptom analysis finds no benefit over placebo for prucalopride on fullness or bloating. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Camilleri M, Chedid V, Ford AC, et al. Gastroparesis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:41.
  2. McCallum RW, Cynshi O. Efficacy of mitemcinal, a motilin agonist, on gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with symptoms suggesting diabetic gastropathy: A randomized, multi- center, placebo-controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:107-116.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ingrosso, M. R., Camilleri, M., Tack, J., Ianiro, G., Black, C. J., & Ford, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • St James's University Hospital (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Ford, Alexander C.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
164
Issue
4
Pages
642-654
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312220029
Cited by
53
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01-DK122280, R01-DK125680)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
gastroparesis, drug efficacy, drug safety, clebopride, domperidone, metoclopramide, prucalopride, dopamine antagonists, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating, adverse events, drug withdrawal, placebo comparison
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis, Humans, Nausea, Tachykinins, Dopamine Antagonists, Gastroparesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review