Cited by 70Liver physiology and pathologyLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Diseases and Immunity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macrophage-Derived Cathepsin S Remodels the Extracellular Matrix to Promote Liver Fibrogenesis

Zuo, Tao, Xie, Qi, Liu, Jinfang, Yang, Jing, Shi, Jiahui, Kong, Degang, Wang, Yin, Zhang, Zhenpeng, Gao, Huixia, Zeng, Dao-Bing, Wang, Xinxin, Tao, Ping, Wei, Wei, Wang, Jun, Li, Yuan, Long, Qi, Li, Chonghui, Chang, Lei, Ning, Huimin, Li, Yanchang, Cui, Chunping, Ge, Xinlan, Wu, Jushan, Li, Guangming, Hong, Xuechuan, Yang, Xiao, Dai, Erhei, He, Fuchu, Wu, Junzhu, Ruan, Yuanyuan, Lu, Shichun, Xu, Ping·2023·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims Liver fibrosis is an intrinsic wound-healing response to chronic injury and the major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. However, no effective diagnostic or therapeutic strategies are available, owing to its poorly characterized molecular etiology. We aimed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying liver fibrogenesis. Methods We performed a quantitative proteomic analysis of clinical fibrotic liver samples to identify dysregulated proteins. Further analyses were performed on the sera of 164 patients with liver fibrosis. Two fibrosis mouse models and several biochemical experiments were used to elucidate liver fibrogenesis. Results We identified cathepsin S (CTSS) up-regulation as a central node for extracellular matrix remodeling in the human fibrotic liver by proteomic screening. Increased serum CTSS levels efficiently predicted liver fibrosis, even at an early stage. Secreted CTSS cleaved collagen 18A1 at its C-terminus, releasing endostatin peptide, which directly bound to and activated hepatic stellate cells via integrin α5β1 signaling, whereas genetic ablation of Ctss remarkably suppressed liver fibrogenesis via endostatin reduction in vivo. Further studies identified macrophages as the main source of hepatic CTSS, and splenectomy effectively attenuated macrophage infiltration and CTSS expression in the fibrotic liver. Pharmacologic inhibition of CTSS ameliorated liver fibrosis progression in the mouse models. Conclusions CTSS functions as a novel profibrotic factor by remodeling extracellular matrix proteins and may represent a promising target for the diagnosis and treatment of liver fibrosis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.05.039

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Asrani, 2019, Burden of liver diseases in the world, J Hepatol, 70, 151, 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Böttcher, 2017, Pathophysiology of liver fibrosis and the methodological barriers to the development of anti-fibrogenic agents, Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 121, 3, 10.1016/j.addr.2017.05.016 · DOI
  3. Seki, 2015, Recent advancement of molecular mechanisms of liver fibrosis, J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 22, 512, 10.1002/jhbp.245 · DOI
  4. Bonnans, 2014, Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 15, 786, 10.1038/nrm3904 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ortiz, 2021, Extracellular matrix remodeling in chronic liver disease, Curr Tissue Microenviron Rep, 2, 41, 10.1007/s43152-021-00030-3 · DOI
  6. Karsdal, 2015, Novel insights into the function and dynamics of extracellular matrix in liver fibrosis, Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 308, G807, 10.1152/ajpgi.00447.2014 · DOI
  7. Mundel, 2007, Type IV collagen-derived angiogenesis inhibitors, Microvasc Res, 74, 85, 10.1016/j.mvr.2007.05.005 · DOI
  8. O'Reilly, 1997, Endostatin: an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth, Cell, 88, 277, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81848-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Rossi, 2004, Comprehensive search for cysteine cathepsins in the human genome, Biol Chem, 385, 363, 10.1515/BC.2004.040 · DOI
  10. Turk, 2012, Cysteine cathepsins: from structure, function and regulation to new frontiers, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1824, 68, 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Honey, 2003, Lysosomal cysteine proteases regulate antigen presentation, Nat Rev Immunol, 3, 472, 10.1038/nri1110 · DOI
  12. Reiser, 2010, Specialized roles for cysteine cathepsins in health and disease, J Clin Invest, 120, 3421, 10.1172/JCI42918 · DOI
  13. Olson, 2015, Cysteine cathepsin proteases: regulators of cancer progression and therapeutic response, Nat Rev Cancer, 15, 712, 10.1038/nrc4027 · DOI
  14. Vizovišek, 2019, Cysteine cathepsins in extracellular matrix remodeling: extracellular matrix degradation and beyond, Matrix Biol, 75–76, 141, 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.01.024 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Repnik, 2015, Cysteine cathepsins activate ELR chemokines and inactivate non-ELR chemokines, J Biol Chem, 290, 13800, 10.1074/jbc.M115.638395 · DOI
  16. Sobotič, 2015, Proteomic identification of cysteine cathepsin substrates shed from the surface of cancer cells, Mol Cell Proteomic, 14, 2213, 10.1074/mcp.M114.044628 · DOI
  17. Turk, 1995, Regulation of the activity of lysosomal cysteine proteinases by pH-induced inactivation and/or endogenous protein inhibitors, cystatins, Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler, 376, 225, 10.1515/bchm3.1995.376.4.225 · DOI
  18. Kirschke, 1989, Cathepsin S from bovine spleen. Purification, distribution, intracellular localization and action on proteins, Biochem J, 264, 467, 10.1042/bj2640467 · DOI
  19. Ruiz-Blázquez, 2021, The multifaceted role of cathepsins in liver disease, J Hepatol, 75, 1192, 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.06.031 · DOI
  20. Reimand, 2016, Profiler-a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2016 update), Nucl Acids Res, 44, W83, 10.1093/nar/gkw199 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Walraven, 2018, Therapeutic approaches to control tissue repair and fibrosis: extracellular matrix as a game changer, Matrix Biol, 71–72, 205, 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.02.020 · DOI
  22. Szklarczyk, 2019, STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, D607, 10.1093/nar/gky1131 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Papastergiou, 2012, Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis, Ann Gastroenterol, 25, 218
  24. Jarcuska, 2010, Circulating markers of liver fibrosis progression, Clin Chim Acta, 411, 1009, 10.1016/j.cca.2010.04.009 · DOI
  25. Liu, 2011, Golgi protein 73(GP73), a useful serum marker in liver diseases, Clin Chem Lab Med, 49, 1311, 10.1515/CCLM.2011.640 · DOI
  26. Kleifeld, 2010, Isotopic labeling of terminal amines in complex samples identifies protein N-termini and protease cleavage products, Nat Biotechnol, 28, 281, 10.1038/nbt.1611 · DOI
  27. Walia, 2015, Endostatin's emerging roles in angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, disease, and clinical applications, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1850, 2422, 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.09.007 · DOI
  28. Li, 2021, Angiogenesis in the progression from liver fibrosis to cirrhosis and hepatocelluar carcinoma, Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 15, 217, 10.1080/17474124.2021.1842732 · DOI
  29. Kukla, 2013, Angiogenesis: a phenomenon which aggravates chronic liver disease progression, Hepatol Int, 7, 4, 10.1007/s12072-012-9391-2 · DOI
  30. Ramachandran, 2019, Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level, Nature, 575, 512, 10.1038/s41586-019-1631-3 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Liang, 2020, The T cell receptor immune repertoire protects the liver from reconsitution, Front Immunol, 11, 10.3389/fimmu.2020.584979 · DOI
  32. Li, 2017, The spleen in liver cirrhosis: revisiting an old enemy with novel targets, J Transl Med, 15, 111, 10.1186/s12967-017-1214-8 · DOI
  33. Yoo, 2022, Therapeutic potential of targeting cathepsin S in pulmonary fibrosis, Biomed Pharmacother, 145, 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112245 · DOI
  34. Bedossa, 2003, Liver extracellular matrix in health and disease, J Pathol, 200, 504, 10.1002/path.1397 · DOI
  35. Iredale, 2013, Extracellular matrix degradation in liver fibrosis: biochemistry and regulation, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1832, 876, 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.11.002 · DOI
  36. Shi, 1999, Cathepsin S required for normal MHC class II peptide loading and germinal center development, Immunity, 10, 197, 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80020-5 · DOI
  37. Chapman, 1997, Emerging roles for cysteine proteases in human biology, Annu Rev Physiol, 59, 63, 10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.63 · DOI
  38. Maciewicz, 1988, A comparison of four cathepsins (B, L, N and S) with collagenolytic activity from rabbit spleen, Biochem J, 256, 433, 10.1042/bj2560433 · DOI
  39. Morton, 1995, Delivery of nascent MHC class II-invariant chain complexes to lysosomal compartments and proteolysis of invariant chain by cysteine proteases precedes peptide binding in B-lymphoblastoid cells, J Immunol, 154, 137, 10.4049/jimmunol.154.1.137 · DOI
  40. Brown, 2020, Cathepsin S: investigating an old player in lung disease pathogenesis, comorbidities, and potential therapeutics, Respir Res, 21, 111, 10.1186/s12931-020-01381-5 · DOI
  41. Wang, 2006, Cathepsin S controls angiogenesis and tumor growth via matrix-derived angiogenic factors, J Biol Chem, 281, 6020, 10.1074/jbc.M509134200 · DOI
  42. Chen, 2014, Endostar, a novel human recombinant endostatin, attenuates liver fibrosis in CCl4-induced mice, Exp Biol Med (Maywood), 239, 998, 10.1177/1535370214532595 · DOI
  43. Lin, 2016, Endostatin and transglutaminase 2 are involved in fibrosis of the aging kidney, Kidney Int, 89, 1281, 10.1016/j.kint.2016.01.030 · DOI
  44. Kim, 2002, Endostatin blocks vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated signaling via direct interaction with KDR/Flk-1, J Biol Chem, 277, 27872, 10.1074/jbc.M202771200 · DOI
  45. Wilkinson, 2015, Cathepsin S: therapeutic, diagnostic, and prognostic potential, Biol Chem, 396, 867, 10.1515/hsz-2015-0114 · DOI
  46. Caglič, 2013, The proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1α and tumor necrosis factor α promote the expression and secretion of proteolytically active cathepsin S from human chondrocytes, Biol Chem, 394, 307, 10.1515/hsz-2012-0283 · DOI
  47. Chwieralski, 2006, Cathepsin-regulated apoptosis, Apoptosis, 11, 143, 10.1007/s10495-006-3486-y · DOI
  48. Schwabe, 2006, Mechanisms of liver injury. I. TNF-alpha-induced liver injury: role of IKK, JNK, and ROS pathways, Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 290, G583, 10.1152/ajpgi.00422.2005 · DOI
  49. Gieling, 2009, Interleukin-1 participates in the progression from liver injury to fibrosis, Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 296, G1324, 10.1152/ajpgi.90564.2008 · DOI
  50. Cheng, 2021, Hepatic macrophages: key players in the development and progression of liver fibrosis, Liver Int, 41, 2279, 10.1111/liv.14940 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Nomura, 2014, Influence of splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis and hypersplenism, Hepatol Res, 44, E100, 10.1111/hepr.12234 · DOI
  52. Iwakiri, 2014, Pathophysiology of portal hypertension, Clin Liver Dis, 18, 281, 10.1016/j.cld.2013.12.001 · DOI
  53. Tanabe, 2015, Migration of splenic lymphocytes promotes liver fibrosis through modification of T helper cytokine balance in mice, J Gastroenterol, 50, 1054, 10.1007/s00535-015-1054-3 · DOI
  54. Wiese, 2007, Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research, Proteomics, 7, 340, 10.1002/pmic.200600422 · DOI
  55. Xu, 2009, Systematical optimization of reverse-phase chromatography for shotgun proteomics, J Proteome Res, 8, 3944, 10.1021/pr900251d · DOI
  56. Qi, 2016, Quantitative proteomics reveals FLNC as a potential progression marker for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, Oncotarget, 7, 68242, 10.18632/oncotarget.11921 · DOI
  57. Jiang, 2022, Mirror proteases of Ac-Trypsin and Ac-LysargiNase precisely improve novel event identifications in Mycolicibacterium smegmatis MC2 155 by proteogenomic analysis, Front Microbiol, 13, 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1015140 · DOI
  58. Le, 2017, Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade, Science, 357, 409, 10.1126/science.aan6733 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Satija, 2015, Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data, Nat Biotechnol, 33, 495, 10.1038/nbt.3192 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zuo, T., Xie, Q., Liu, J., Yang, J., Shi, J., Kong, D., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Gao, H., Zeng, D.-B., Wang, X., Tao, P., Wei, W., Wang, J., Li, Y., Long, Q., Li, C., Chang, L., Ning, H., Li, Y., Cui, C., Ge, X., Wu, J., Li, G., Hong, X., Yang, X., Dai, E., He, F., Wu, J., Ruan, Y., Lu, S., & Xu, P.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Army Medical University (CN)
  • Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
  • Fifth Hospital of Shijiazhuang (CN)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Junzhu
  • Ruan, Yuanyuan
  • Lu, Shichun
  • Xu, Ping
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
165
Issue
3
Pages
746-761.e16
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378840629
Cited by
70
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4
FWCI
11.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070668, 32071431, 32101190, 32141003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
cathepsin S, liver fibrosis, extracellular matrix remodeling, macrophages, endostatin, hepatic stellate cells, serum biomarkers, splenectomy, fibrosis diagnosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cathepsins, Disease Models, Animal, Extracellular Matrix, Fibrosis, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Macrophages, Proteomics, Endostatins, Mice, Hepatic Stellate Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review