Cited by 104COVID-19 and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and careCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

COVID-19 Pandemic Stressors and Psychological Symptoms in Breast Cancer Patients

Open access
Massicotte, Véronique, Ivers, Hans, Savard, Josée·2021·Current Oncology

Abstract

Background. The current Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a highly stressful event that may lead to significant psychological symptoms, particularly in cancer patients who are at a greater risk of contracting viruses. This study examined the frequency of stressors experienced in relation to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and its relationship with psychological symptoms (i.e., anxiety, depression, insomnia, fear of cancer recurrence) in breast cancer patients. Methods. Thirty-six women diagnosed with a non-metastatic breast cancer completed the Insomnia Severity Index, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the severity subscale of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory, and the COVID-19 Stressors Questionnaire developed by our research team. Participants either completed the questionnaires during (30.6%) or after (69.4%) their chemotherapy treatment. Results. Results revealed that most of the participants (63.9%) have experienced at least one stressor related to the COVID-19 pandemic (one: 27.8%, two: 22.2%, three: 11.1%). The most frequently reported stressor was increased responsibilities at home (33.3%). Higher levels of concerns related to the experienced stressors were significantly correlated with higher levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, insomnia, and fear of cancer recurrence, rs(32) = 0.36 to 0.59, all ps < 0.05. Conclusions. Cancer patients experience a significant number of stressors related to the COVID-19 pandemic, which are associated with increased psychological symptoms. These results contribute to a better understanding of the psychological consequences of a global pandemic in the context of cancer and they highlight the need to better support patients during such a challenging time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/curroncol28010034

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recruitment was conducted during the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have temporarily increased participants' anxiety about their medical condition.

    “It is also important to note that recruitment for this study was conducted during the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic [81]. Because of the impact that the pandemic had on the health care system (e.g., postponement of certain tests), this may have temporarily increased the participants’ anxiety about their medical condition [82, 83].”

    From Fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors carrying a BRCA1 or 2 genetic mutation : a cross-sectional study (2024) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Results (§3.2) report postponed medical tests and an association between greater concern about pandemic stressors and higher anxiety. The Discussion (§4) also describes the possible psychological impact of postponed tests and treatment. The study examined patients during the first wave, however, and did not establish that anxiety increased temporarily among participants recruited during later waves; the separate citation [81], not this source, accompanies the recruitment timing. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Massicotte V. Ivers H. Savard J. The Relationship of Stressors Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic with Psychological Symptoms in Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Proceedings of the 35th Annual Canadian Association of Psycho-Oncology (CAPO) Conference Virtual (online) 15–17 July 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Massicotte, V., Ivers, H., & Savard, J.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Savard, Josée
Venue
Current Oncology
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-01-08
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
294-300
ISSN
  • 1198-0052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1718-7729
OpenAlex
W3119745833
Cited by
104
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 12
FWCI
15.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, breast cancer, psychological stressors, anxiety, depression, insomnia, fear of cancer recurrence, family responsibilities, chemotherapy, psychological symptoms
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Patient Health Questionnaire, COVID-19, Adult, Anxiety, Breast Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Fear, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review