CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 82Infant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

The spectrum of behavioral outcomes after extreme prematurity: regulatory, attention, social, and adaptive dimensions

Msall, Michael E., Park, Jennifer J.·2008·Seminars in Perinatology
DOI 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.12.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Advances in obstetrics and neonatology have increased the survival rates of premature infants with very preterm (<32 weeks) and extremely preterm (<28 weeks) gestations. However, survivors have a high frequency of challenges in academic and social skills. There has been an increased emphasis on examination of outcomes beyond survival rates and rates of neurosensory disabilities at ages 18 to 24 months (eg, cerebral palsy, blindness, deafness, global development delay). One of the key strategies for understanding pathways of risk and resilience is to examine behavioral, social-emotional, and adaptive competencies. The purpose of this paper is to apply the International Classification of Functioning framework to a spectrum of behavioral outcomes after extreme prematurity, describe useful tools for measuring behavioral, social, and adaptive competencies, as well as review model outcome studies before middle childhood. Thus, we can use current information to begin to understand pathways underlying behavioral health, well-being, and social competence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.12.006

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Msall, M. E., & Park, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Msall, Michael E.
ORCID
Venue
Seminars in Perinatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
42-50
ISSN
0146-0005 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1053/j.semperi.2007.12.006
OpenAlex
W2071919306
Cited by
82
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Seminars in Perinatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
extremely preterm birth, very preterm infants, behavioral effects, socioemotional skills, adaptive behavior, regulatory behavior, attention, social competence, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, neurodevelopmental outcomes, risk and resilience
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review