Cited by 22Eating Disorders and BehaviorsDigital Mental Health InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Implementierung und Dissemination eines internetbasierten Programms zur Prävention und frühen Intervention bei Essstörungen

Minarik, Carla, Moessner, Markus, Ozer, Fikret, Bauer, Stephanie·2013·Psychiatrische Praxis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study reports on the implementation and dissemination of an internet-based program for prevention and early intervention in eating disorders (ProYouth). METHODS: The program consists of several modules that can be flexibly combined by users depending on their individual needs for support. The uptake and utilization of the online intervention, user characteristics, as well as the estimated amount of required resources to maintain the program are analyzed. RESULTS: Within 16 months, 1211 individuals registered for participation in the program. Active utilization of the different modules varies highly between participants and is related to their degree of impairment. User satisfaction is high. With the current sample, managing the platform requires approximately 11.5 hours of staff time per week. In a sample of 1000 participants, fixed costs (e. g. server and software maintenance) and cost for provision of online support amount to approx. 15 Euro per participant per year. CONCLUSIONS: ProYouth allows for the provision of individualized support based on participants' needs. Maintenance of the program is efficient since modules are partly automated. More research on the implementation and dissemination of internet-based interventions is needed to facilitate transfer into routine care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0033-1349488

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Minarik, C., Moessner, M., Ozer, F., & Bauer, S.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Forschungsstelle für Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Corresponding author
Minarik, Carla
Venue
Psychiatrische Praxis
Published
2013-09-05
Volume
40
Issue
06
Pages
332-338
ISSN
  • 0303-4259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0876
OpenAlex
W2322019631
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatrische Praxis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
eating disorders, online intervention, prevention, early intervention, implementation, dissemination, program utilization, user satisfaction, cost analysis, software maintenance, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Consumer Behavior, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Self Care, Social Support, Software, Cost Savings, Internet, Early Diagnosis, Young Adult, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review