Cited by 19Eating Disorders and BehaviorsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and Access

Dissemination of an Internet-Based Program for the Prevention and Early Intervention in Eating Disorders: Relationship Between Access Paths, User Characteristics, and Program Utilization

Bauer, Stephanie, Bilić, Sally, Ozer, Fikret, Moessner, Markus·2020·Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie

Abstract

Abstract. Objective: Research on the dissemination of e-mental health interventions is in an early stage, so that little is known about the reach, costs, participant characteristics, and patterns of program utilization associated with different recruitment strategies and access paths. This study investigated differences between user groups informed about an Internet-based program for the prevention and early intervention in eating disorders via different recruitment channels. Method: Participant characteristics and user behavior of 3548 participants in the Internet-based program ProYouth were analyzed. Participants were informed about ProYouth via different channels (e. g., print materials, high school, Internet). Results: Results indicate significant relationships between access paths and both user characteristics and program utilization. Participants who were informed about ProYouth at their high schools were more likely to be male, younger, and at lower risk of developing eating disorders. In contrast, other recruitment channels (e. g., Internet, print materials) resulted in participants with significantly higher risk and symptom levels who used the program more frequently and with higher intensity. Conclusion: Efforts aimed at the dissemination of Internet-based interventions should consider the effects that different recruitment channels and access paths may have on sample composition and utilization of the intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1024/1422-4917/a000662

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, S., Bilić, S., Ozer, F., & Moessner, M.
Affiliations
  • Center for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Venue
Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Published
2020-01-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
25-32
ISSN
  • 1422-4917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1664-2880
OpenAlex
W2942728338
Cited by
19
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
eating disorders, prevention, early intervention, online intervention, e-mental health, dissemination, recruitment channels, access paths, adolescents, program utilization, risk level, sample composition
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Schools, Students, Internet, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review