Cited by 9Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMental Health Treatment and AccessNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Enhancing help-seeking behavior in individuals with eating disorder symptoms via Internet: A case report

Kindermann, Sally, Ali, Kathina, Minarik, Carla, Moessner, Markus, Bauer, Stephanie·2016·Mental Health & Prevention

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mhp.2016.04.002

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kindermann, S., Ali, K., Minarik, C., Moessner, M., & Bauer, S.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Schön Klinik Roseneck (DE)
Corresponding author
Kindermann, Sally
Venue
Mental Health & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
69-74
ISSN
2212-6570 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346040380
Cited by
9
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mental Health & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Third Health Programme
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
help-seeking, eating disorders, eating disorder symptoms, online intervention, prevention and early intervention, help-seeking barriers, server logs, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review