Cited by 25Health Literacy and Information AccessibilitySocial Media in Health EducationOvarian function and disorders

What Can You Find about Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Online? Assessing Online Information on PCOS: Quality, Content, and User-Friendliness

Chiu, Wei-Ling, Kuczynska-Burggraf, Millicent, Gibson-Helm, Melanie, Teede, Helena, Vincent, Amanda, Boyle, Jacqueline·2018·Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common yet complex condition, where education is vital. It predominantly affects reproductive-aged women, the age group with peak use of the Internet, now a major source of health information. Women with PCOS are dissatisfied with care, and the lack of useful online information is a key concern. METHODS: Using a rigorous and systematic methodology, we examined the quality, information content, and user-friendliness of online information about PCOS. Internet searches were conducted in Australia and the United Kingdom in December 2015 using Google, Bing, and Yahoo with different browsers, operating systems, and domain names. A total of 75 Web sites were evaluated and categorized. RESULTS: The majority of Web sites were commercial (41%) and not-for-profit (76%) and were aimed at women only. Less than a third of the Web sites were externally accredited. Commercial Web sites and Web sites targeting only women had the lowest quality scores, while professional-society Web sites and Web sites targeting only HPs scored the highest in quality. Accredited Web sites had higher quality and user-friendliness scores than nonaccredited Web sites. CONCLUSION: The majority of PCOS Web sites were commercially derived, targeted women, and were not accredited. There is a significant lack of quality, easy-to-read, evidence-based information online for women with PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1667186

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent studies highlighted a high number of websites with a commercial background.

    “More recent studies highlighted the high number of websites in their findings with a commercial background [46,47,91], also pointing out a possible advantage in the quality of results when using Google, compared to other search engines [91].”
  • The majority (n = 5) of website studies involved analysis of content from search engine results.

    “The majority (n = 5) involved analysis of content from search engine results [46,47,91,94,95], while one each looked at content in teen and women’s digital magazines [93], French language internet forums [90], and a specific PCOS-related website [92].”
  • Eight included studies in the scoping review related to PCOS content on websites.

    “Eight included studies related to PCOS content on websites [46,47,90,91,92,93,94,95] (Supplementary File S3).”
  • The eight website studies originated from France, USA, Australia, Croatia, Greece, and the UK, with specified publication years.

    “Regarding publication date and country of origin, two studies published in 2020 were from France [90] and USA [92], two in 2018 from Australia [46,47], one in 2016 from the USA [93], one in 2023 from Croatia [91], one in 2012 from Greece [94], and another in 2010 from the UK [95].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiu, W.-L., Kuczynska-Burggraf, M., Gibson-Helm, M., Teede, H., Vincent, A., & Boyle, J.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Corresponding author
Boyle, Jacqueline
Venue
Seminars in Reproductive Medicine
Published
2018-01
Volume
36
Issue
01
Pages
050-058
ISSN
  • 1526-4564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-8004
OpenAlex
W2889612488
Cited by
24
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Reproductive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, online health information, website quality, ease of use, health information quality, commercial health websites, accreditation, evidence-based information, women's health education, search engine results
MeSH terms
Australia, Female, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Internet, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review