Cited by 17Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityOvarian function and disordersSocial Media in Health Education

Informing Translation: The Accuracy of Information on Websites for Lifestyle Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Htet, Thaw, Cassar, S., Kuczynska-Burggraf, Millicent, Gibson-Helm, Melanie, Chiu, Wei-Ling, Stepto, N., Moran, Lisa, Boyle, Jacqueline·2018·Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

Abstract

Lifestyle (diet, physical activity [PA], and/or behavioral) interventions are recommended for all women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in international guidelines. The internet is a widely used health information resource. However, the accuracy of lifestyle information on PCOS websites is unknown and is reviewed here to inform translation of the international guideline on PCOS. An internet search was conducted with three search engines across different web browsers and countries. Accuracy was assessed through a checklist of 29 questions based on international guidelines for diet, PA, or weight management for the general population and for PCOS with higher scores indicating greater accuracy. Fifteen websites were eligible out of 72 (20%). The total accuracy score was 56 ± 13 (mean ± standard deviation; potential range: -29 to 87) comprising 23 ± 6 for diet (-11 to 33), 15 ± 5 for PA (-9 to 27), and 14 ± 3 for weight management (-8 to 24). A moderate proportion of websites provided general information on appropriate diet (40-80%) or weight management strategies (47-60%), but only 10 to 40% of websites provided information on core foods, discretionary foods, exercise quantity/intensity, energy deficits, or behavioral strategies. Limited websites on PCOS contain information on lifestyle management. The majority provided information on general diet, PA, and weight recommendations but less information on practical implementation of lifestyle change as an identified translation gap for the international guideline on PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1667309

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority (n = 5) of website studies involved analysis of content from search engine results.

    “The majority (n = 5) involved analysis of content from search engine results [46,47,91,94,95], while one each looked at content in teen and women’s digital magazines [93], French language internet forums [90], and a specific PCOS-related website [92].”
  • More recent studies highlighted a high number of websites with a commercial background.

    “More recent studies highlighted the high number of websites in their findings with a commercial background [46,47,91], also pointing out a possible advantage in the quality of results when using Google, compared to other search engines [91].”
  • A 2018 study found overall accuracy of information on PCOS websites was suboptimal.

    “A 2018 study highlighted the paucity of lifestyle information on PCOS websites and how the overall accuracy of the information on websites was suboptimal [47].”
  • Eight included studies in the scoping review related to PCOS content on websites.

    “Eight included studies related to PCOS content on websites [46,47,90,91,92,93,94,95] (Supplementary File S3).”
  • A 2018 study highlighted the paucity of lifestyle information on PCOS websites.

    “A 2018 study highlighted the paucity of lifestyle information on PCOS websites and how the overall accuracy of the information on websites was suboptimal [47].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Htet, T., Cassar, S., Kuczynska-Burggraf, M., Gibson-Helm, M., Chiu, W.-L., Stepto, N., Moran, L., & Boyle, J.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Corresponding author
Boyle, Jacqueline
Venue
Seminars in Reproductive Medicine
Published
2018-01
Volume
36
Issue
01
Pages
080-085
ISSN
  • 1526-4564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-8004
OpenAlex
W2890200776
Cited by
16
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Reproductive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, lifestyle management, health information websites, diet, physical activity, weight management, behavioral interventions, guideline translation, online health information
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Diet, Female, Humans, Life Style, Patient Education as Topic, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Exercise, Disease Management, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review