Cited by 73Plant biochemistry and biosynthesisPlant tissue culture and regenerationSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies

Evalutation of Artemisia annua Strains for Higher Artemisinin Production*

Singh, A., Vishwakarma, R., Husain, A.·1988·Planta Medica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2006-962515

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, A., Vishwakarma, R., & Husain, A.
Affiliations
Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (IN)
Venue
Planta Medica
Published
1988-10
Volume
54
Issue
05
Pages
475-476
ISSN
  • 0032-0943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0221
OpenAlex
W2047056824
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Planta Medica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
Keywords
Artemisia annua, artemisinin production, strain evaluation, high-yield cultivation, medicinal plant breeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review