Cited by 166Exercise and Physiological ResponsesCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and Training

The Acute Immune Response to Exercise: What Does It Mean?

Gabriel, H., Kindermann, W.·1997·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide information about the exercise-induced alterations of cellular immune parameters depending on the intensity related to the individual anaerobic threshold (IAT) and duration of exercise. Immunological parameters were differential blood counts (CD14, CD45), monocyte subpopulations (CD14, CD16), lymphocyte subpopulations (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RO, CD19, CD16, CD56, HLA-DR) and natural killer cells (CD3, CD16, CD56), oxidative burst activity of neutrophils, and phagocytosis of neutrophils (flow cytometry). The main results were: (a) "Moderate" exercise (duration < 2h at about 85% of the IAT corresponding to a lactate steady state at about 2 mmol.l-1, < 30 min at the IAT corresponding to a lactate steady state of 4 mmol.l-1) elicits lower changes in cell concentrations and hormonal responses than strenuous exercise [exhaustive exercise at 100% IAT or above; (exhaustive) long-term (> 2-3h) endurance exercise]. Similar investigations about cell functions to decide about the positive or negative nature of these observations will have to follow in the future. (b) The neutrocytosis following exercise is more dependent on the duration than on the intensity of exercise. Especially exercise sessions that lead to a strong incline of the adrenocorticotropic hormone, beta-endorphin and cortisol are associated with this neutrocytosis. (c) Neutrophils' function during the exercise-induced neutrocytosis indicated by phagocytosis and oxidative burst activity is unchanged or reduced following strenuous endurance exercise, whereas bacterial URTI leads to similar neutrophil counts but significantly increased cell activities indicating the diverse meaning of the leukocytosis in infections (primed cells, enhanced cell activity, stimulated defense mechanism) and following exercise (impaired cell function, suppressed defense mechanism). (d) Regular monocytes (early differentiation stage) are strongly recruited into the circulation during long-term aerobic exercise, whereas mature monocyte cell counts (premacrophages) increase most with highly intensive (an)aerobic exercise above the IAT. Infections induced a maturation from regular to mature monocytes as a response to the infectious antigenic stimulus, whereas exercise does not, indicating the diversity between change of cell counts and function. (e) Long-term endurance diverse meaning leads to increases of activated CD45RO+ T cells (memory cell phenotype) but compared to the incline of cell concentrations and activation levels (% HLA-DR+ T cells) during infections like infectious mononucleosis this effect is small indicating only minor effects on T cell function by exercise. The effect of single bouts of exercise on immune cell counts is large but the effects on the cell function is - i.e. compared to bacterial URTI - relatively small.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-2007-972698

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acute exercise-induced changes in some immunological variables can only be characterised accurately if sample timing is optimal due to transient lymphocyte trafficking patterns.

    “For example, acute exercise-induced changes in some immunological variables (e.g., blood lymphocyte number, phenotype and cell subset composition) can only be characterised accurately if sample timing is optimal due to transient lymphocyte trafficking patterns (for a time course of changes, see Gabriel and Kindermann 1997; Gleeson and Bishop 2005).”

    From Is immunosenescence influenced by our lifetime “dose” of exercise? (2016) · cites this paper as Gabriel and Kindermann 1997

  • After exercise, total lymphocyte count returns to pre-exercise levels within approximately 6-10 h.

    “after exercise the total lymphocyte count returns to pre-exercise levels within approximately 6–10 h (Gabriel and Kindermann 1997; Gleeson and Bishop 2005)”

    From Is immunosenescence influenced by our lifetime “dose” of exercise? (2016) · cites this paper as Gabriel and Kindermann 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabriel, H., & Kindermann, W.
Affiliations
Saarland University (DE)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
1997-03
Volume
18
Issue
S 1
Pages
S28-S45
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W2089224407
Cited by
166
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
acute immune response, physical activity, individual anaerobic threshold, exercise intensity, exercise duration, neutrophil phagocytosis, neutrophil respiratory burst, monocyte subpopulations, lymphocyte subsets, natural killer cells, HLA-DR, ACTH, beta-endorphin, cortisol, upper respiratory tract infection
MeSH terms
Acute-Phase Reaction, Humans, Immunity, Cellular, Killer Cells, Natural, Leukocytosis, Phagocytes, Phagocytosis, Exercise, Lymphocyte Subsets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review