Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 876

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Causes and Risk of Stroke in Patients with Asymptomatic Internal-Carotid-Artery Stenosis

Open access
Inzitari, Domenico, Eliasziw, Michael, Gates, Peter, Sharpe, Brenda L., Chan, Richard K.T., Meldrum, Heather E., Barnett, Henry J.M.·2000·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The causes of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid-artery stenosis have not been carefully studied. Information about causes might influence decisions about the use of carotid endarterectomy in such patients. METHODS: We studied patients with unilateral symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis and asymptomatic contralateral stenosis from 1988 to 1997. The causes, severity, risk, and predictors of stroke in the territory of the asymptomatic artery were examined and quantified. RESULTS: The risk of stroke at five years after study entry in a total of 1820 patients increased with the severity of stenosis. Among 1604 patients with stenosis of less than 60 percent of the luminal diameter, the risk of a first stroke was 8.0 percent (1.6 percent annually), as compared with 16.2 percent (3.2 percent annually) among 216 patients with 60 to 99 percent stenosis. In the group with 60 to 99 percent stenosis, the five-year risk of stroke in the territory of a large artery was 9.9 percent, that of lacunar stroke was 6.0 percent, and that of cardioembolic stroke 2.1 percent. Some patients had more than one stroke of more than one cause. In the territory of an asymptomatic occluded artery (as was identified in 86 patients), the annualized risk of stroke was 1.9 percent. Strokes with different causes had different risk factors. The risk factors for large-artery stroke were silent brain infarction, a history of diabetes, and a higher degree of stenosis; for cardioembolic stroke, a history of myocardial infarction or angina and hypertension; for lacunar stroke, age of 75 years or older, hypertension, diabetes, and a higher degree of stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of stroke among patients with asymptomatic carotid-artery stenosis is relatively low. Forty-five percent of strokes in patients with asymptomatic stenosis of 60 to 99 percent are attributable to lacunes or cardioembolism. These observations have implications for the use of endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients. Without analysis of the risk of stroke according to cause, the absolute benefit associated with endarterectomy may be overestimated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200006083422302

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 876

Metadata

Authors
Inzitari, D., Eliasziw, M., Gates, P., Sharpe, B. L., Chan, R. K. T., Meldrum, H. E., & Barnett, H. J. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2000-06-08
Volume
342
Issue
23
Pages
1693-1701
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2318287425
Cited by
876
References
1
FWCI
33.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Causes and Risk of Stroke in Patients with Asymptomatic Internal-Carotid-Artery Stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200006083422302
The paper
Inzitari, D., Eliasziw, M., Gates, P., Sharpe, B. L., Chan, R. K. T., Meldrum, H. E., & Barnett, H. J. M. (2000). The Causes and Risk of Stroke in Patients with Asymptomatic Internal-Carotid-Artery Stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200006083422302

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.