The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction and 30-Day Mortality among Women and Men
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that women with acute myocardial infarction receive less aggressive therapy than men. We used data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project to determine whether women and men who were ideal candidates for therapy after acute myocardial infarction were treated differently. METHODS: Information was abstracted from the charts of 138,956 Medicare beneficiaries (49 percent of them women) who had an acute myocardial infarction in 1994 or 1995. Multivariate analysis was used to assess differences between women and men in the medications administered, the procedures used, the assignment of do-not-resuscitate status, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Among ideal candidates for therapy, women in all age groups were less likely to undergo diagnostic catheterization than men. The difference was especially pronounced among older women; for a woman 85 years of age or older, the adjusted relative risk was 0.75 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.83). Women were somewhat less likely than men to receive thrombolytic therapy within 60 minutes (adjusted relative risk, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 0.96) or to receive aspirin within 24 hours after arrival at the hospital (adjusted relative risk, 0.96; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.95 to 0.97), but they were equally likely to receive beta-blockers (adjusted relative risk, 0.99; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.03) and somewhat more likely to receive angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (adjusted relative risk, 1.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.08). Women were more likely than men to have a do-not-resuscitate order in their records (adjusted relative risk, 1.26; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.22 to 1.29). After adjustment, women and men had similar 30-day mortality rates (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.04). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with men, women receive somewhat less aggressive treatment during the early management of acute myocardial infarction. However, many of these differences are small, and there is no apparent effect on early mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists' (FTT) Collaborative Group (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91161-4 · Cited by 2,744
Sex-Based Differences in Early Mortality after Myocardial Infarction
Vaccarino, V., Parsons, L., Every, N. R., Barron, H. V., & Krumholz, H. M. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199907223410401 · Cited by 1,298
Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease
Ayanian, J. Z., & Epstein, A. M. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199107253250401 · Cited by 1,188
Rosamond, W. D., Chambless, L. E., Folsom, A. R., Cooper, L. S., Conwill, D. E., Clegg, L., Wang, C.-H., & Heiss, G. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199809243391301 · Cited by 827
BINOMIAL REGRESSION IN GLIM: ESTIMATING RISK RATIOS AND RISK DIFFERENCES1
WACHOLDER, S. (1986) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114212 · Cited by 623
Krumholz, H. M., Radford, M. J., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Heiat, A., & Marciniak, T. A. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.7.623 · Cited by 494
Greenland, P., Reicher-Reiss, H., Goldbourt, U., & Behar, S. (1991) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.83.2.484 · Cited by 453
Ellerbeck, E. F. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520430045037 · Cited by 374
Vaccarino, V., Krumholz, H. M., Berkman, L. F., & Horwitz, R. I. (1995) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.91.6.1861 · Cited by 340
Chandra, N. C. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.9.981 · Cited by 334
Cited by
Sex Differences in Mortality Following Acute Coronary Syndromes
Berger, J. S. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1227 · Cited by 548
Shah, A. S. V., Griffiths, M., Lee, K. K., McAllister, D. A., Hunter, A. L., Ferry, A. V., Cruikshank, A., Reid, A., Stoddart, M., Strachan, F., et al. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7873 · Cited by 450
Dey, S., Flather, M. D., Devlin, G., Brieger, D., Gurfinkel, E. P., Steg, P. G., FitzGerald, G., Jackson, E. A., Eagle, K. A., & for the GRACE investigators (2009) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.138537 · Cited by 419
Gender differences in cardiovascular disease
Gao, Z., Chen, Z., Sun, A., & Deng, X. (2019) · Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices · doi:10.1016/j.medntd.2019.100025 · Cited by 373
Milcent, C., Dormont, B., Durand-Zaleski, I., & Steg, P. G. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.664979 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Gan, S. C., Beaver, S. K., Houck, P. M., MacLehose, R. F., Lawson, H. W., & Chan, L.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2000-07-06
- Volume
- 343
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-15
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2071727962
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction and 30-Day Mortality among Women and Men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200007063430102
- The paper
- Gan, S. C., Beaver, S. K., Houck, P. M., MacLehose, R. F., Lawson, H. W., & Chan, L. (2000). Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction and 30-Day Mortality among Women and Men. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200007063430102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.