Cited by 443Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersViral Infections and Immunology ResearchCardiac tumors and thrombi

Abatacept for Severe Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Associated Myocarditis

Open access
Salem, Joe-Elie, Allenbach, Yves, Vozy, Aurore, Brechot, Nicolas, Johnson, Douglas B., Moslehi, Javid J., Kerneis, Mathieu·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Abatacept for Nivolumab-Induced Myocarditis Autoimmune myocarditis is a rare but often fatal complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer. A case of glucocorticoid-refractory myoc...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmc1901677

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abatacept alone or in combination with ruxolitinib has demonstrated clinical benefits in treating patients with ICI myocarditis and murine models.

    “Additionally, as previously discussed, abatacept alone or in combination with ruxolitinib has demonstrated clinical benefits in treating patients with ICI myocarditis and murine models (Figure 2). 51,254,260”

    From Autoimmune Myocarditis, Old Dogs and New Tricks. (2024) · cites this paper as [260]

    In “Abatacept for Severe Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Associated Myocarditis” (page not provided), the authors report improvement after abatacept in one patient with ICI-associated myocarditis. The paper does not report treatment with ruxolitinib or results in murine models; its mention of preclinical studies is not evidence of those claimed results in this paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In steroid-refractory ICI myocarditis, abatacept, alemtuzumab, and antithymocyte globulin have been used in case reports.

    “In cases refractory to steroids, other immunomodulators, including abatacept (a CTLA-4 agonist), alemtuzumab (anti-CD52 antibody), and antithymocyte globulin (antiCD3 antibody) have been used in case reports.”

    From Autoimmune Myocarditis, Old Dogs and New Tricks. (2024) · cites this paper as [260]

    In “Abatacept for Severe Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Associated Myocarditis” (page not provided), the authors report a case in which abatacept, a CTLA-4 agonist, was used for glucocorticoid-refractory ICI myocarditis. Our copy does not report case use of alemtuzumab or antithymocyte globulin, so it supports only the abatacept portion of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent studies implemented pathogenic T cells as potential diagnostic or therapeutic targets for autoimmune myocarditis including ICI myocarditis, demonstrating promising outcomes at both clinical and preclinical levels.

    “Recent studies implemented pathogenic T cells as potential diagnostic or therapeutic targets for autoimmune myocarditis including ICI myocarditis, demonstrating promising outcomes at both clinical and preclinical levels. 51,64,238,254,260,311,312”

    From Autoimmune Myocarditis, Old Dogs and New Tricks. (2024) · cites this paper as [260]

  • A murine model of myocarditis provided a rationale for using CTLA4-Ig (abatacept) to block T-cell costimulation.

    “For example, the recent development of a murine model of myocarditis, one of the most feared complications of ICT, provided a rationale for the use of CTLA4-Ig (abatacept), which blocks T-cell costimulation, although an open question remains as to whether this will interfere with antitumor immunity (97,98).”

    From The Next Decade of Immune Checkpoint Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [98]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salem, J.-E., Allenbach, Y., Vozy, A., Brechot, N., Johnson, D. B., Moslehi, J. J., & Kerneis, M.
Affiliations
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-06-13
Volume
380
Issue
24
Pages
2377-2379
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2950056455
Cited by
443
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 17
FWCI
25.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac tumors and thrombi
Keywords
abatacept, immune checkpoint inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis, severe myocarditis, immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity, IL-2 receptor blockade
MeSH terms
Abatacept, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Nivolumab, Aged, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Lung Neoplasms, Myocarditis, Myositis, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review