Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 457

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Neutralization after mRNA-1273 Booster Vaccination

Open access
Pajon, Rolando, Doria-Rose, Nicole A., Shen, Xiaoying, Schmidt, Stephen D., O’Dell, Sijy, McDanal, Charlene, Feng, Wenhong, Tong, Jin, Eaton, Amanda, Maglinao, Maha, Tang, Haili, Manning, Kelly E., Edara, Venkata-Viswanadh, Lai, Lilin, Ellis, Madison, Moore, Kathryn M., Floyd, Katharine, Foster, Stephanie L., Posavad, Christine M., Atmar, Robert L., Lyke, Kirsten E., Zhou, Tongqing, Wang, Lingshu, Zhang, Yi, Gaudinski, Martin R., Black, Walker P., Gordon, Ingelise, Guech, Mercy, Ledgerwood, Julie E., Misasi, John N., Widge, Alicia, Sullivan, Nancy J., Roberts, Paul C., Beigel, John H., Korber, Bette, Baden, Lindsey R., El Sahly, Hana, Chalkias, Spyros, Zhou, Honghong, Feng, Jing, Girard, Bethany, Das, Rituparna, Aunins, Anne, Edwards, Darin K., Suthar, Mehul S., Mascola, John R., Montefiori, David C.·2022·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is raising concerns because of its increased transmissibility and potential for reduced susceptibility to antibody neutralization. To assess the potential risk of this variant to existing vaccines, serum samples from mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients were tested for neutralizing activity against Omicron and compared to neutralization titers against D614G and Beta in live virus and pseudovirus assays. Omicron was 41-84-fold less sensitive to neutralization than D614G and 5.3-7.4-fold less sensitive than Beta when assayed with serum samples obtained 4 weeks after 2 standard inoculations with 100 μg mRNA-1273. A 50 μg boost increased Omicron neutralization titers and may substantially reduce the risk of symptomatic vaccine breakthrough infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmc2119912

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 457

Metadata

Authors
Pajon, R., Doria-Rose, N. A., Shen, X., Schmidt, S. D., O’Dell, S., McDanal, C., Feng, W., Tong, J., Eaton, A., Maglinao, M., Tang, H., Manning, K. E., Edara, V.-V., Lai, L., Ellis, M., Moore, K. M., Floyd, K., Foster, S. L., Posavad, C. M., Atmar, R. L., Lyke, K. E., Zhou, T., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Gaudinski, M. R., Black, W. P., Gordon, I., Guech, M., Ledgerwood, J. E., Misasi, J. N., Widge, A., Sullivan, N. J., Roberts, P. C., Beigel, J. H., Korber, B., Baden, L. R., El Sahly, H., Chalkias, S., Zhou, H., Feng, J., Girard, B., Das, R., Aunins, A., Edwards, D. K., Suthar, M. S., Mascola, J. R., & Montefiori, D. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2022-03-17
Volume
386
Issue
11
Pages
1088-1091
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4210617949
Cited by
457
References
7
FWCI
49.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Neutralization after mRNA-1273 Booster Vaccination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmc2119912
The paper
Pajon, R., Doria-Rose, N. A., Shen, X., Schmidt, S. D., O’Dell, S., McDanal, C., Feng, W., Tong, J., Eaton, A., Maglinao, M., Tang, H., Manning, K. E., Edara, V.-V., Lai, L., Ellis, M., Moore, K. M., Floyd, K., Foster, S. L., Posavad, C. M., . . . Montefiori, D. C. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Neutralization after mRNA-1273 Booster Vaccination. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc2119912

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.