The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Three Fluid Solutions for Resuscitation in Dengue Shock Syndrome
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Dengue shock syndrome is characterized by severe vascular leakage and disordered hemostasis and progresses to death in 1 to 5 percent of cases. Although volume replacement is recognized as the critical therapeutic intervention, World Health Organization management guidelines remain empirical rather than evidence-based. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized comparison of three fluids for initial resuscitation of Vietnamese children with dengue shock syndrome. We randomly assigned 383 children with moderately severe shock to receive Ringer's lactate, 6 percent dextran 70 (a colloid), or 6 percent hydroxyethyl starch (a colloid) and 129 children with severe shock to receive one of the colloids. The primary outcome measure was requirement for rescue colloid at any time after administration of the study fluid. RESULTS: Only one patient died (<0.2 percent mortality). The primary outcome measure--requirement for rescue colloid--was similar for the different fluids in the two severity groups. The relative risk of requirement for rescue colloid was 1.08 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.47; P=0.65) among children with moderate shock who received Ringer's lactate as compared with either of the colloid solutions, 1.13 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.74; P=0.59) among children who received dextran as compared with starch in the group with severe shock, and 0.88 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 1.17; P=0.38) among children who received dextran as compared with starch in the combined analysis. Although treatment with Ringer's lactate resulted in less rapid improvement in the hematocrit and a marginally longer time to initial recovery than did treatment with either of the colloid solutions, there were no differences in all other measures of treatment response. Only minor differences in efficacy were detected between the two colloids, but significantly more recipients of dextran than of starch had adverse reactions. Bleeding manifestations, coagulation derangements, and severity of fluid overload were similar for all fluid-treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Initial resuscitation with Ringer's lactate is indicated for children with moderately severe dengue shock syndrome. Dextran 70 and 6 percent hydroxyethyl starch perform similarly in children with severe shock, but given the adverse reactions associated with the use of dextran, starch may be preferable for this group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1016/S0022-3476(66)80249-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)12483-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2395 · DOI · Paper page
- Schierhout G, 1998, BMJ, 316, 961, 10.1136/bmj.316.7136.961 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00003246-199901000-00053 · DOI · Paper page
- Alderson P, 2000, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, CD000567
- Haupt MT, 1992, Crit Care Clin, 8, 341, 10.1016/S0749-0704(18)30254-9 · doi:10.1016/s0749-0704(18)30254-9
- Griffel MI, 1992, Crit Care Clin, 8, 235, 10.1016/S0749-0704(18)30249-5 · doi:10.1016/s0749-0704(18)30249-5
- 10.1086/520435 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/318479 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/422754 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa040232 · DOI · Paper page
- Starling EH, 1896, J Physiol, 19, 312, 10.1113/jphysiol.1896.sp000596 · DOI · Paper page
- Michel CC, 1999, Physiol Rev, 79, 703, 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.3.703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1987.tb08047.x · doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.1987.tb08047.x
- Schneeberger EE, 1990, Am J Physiol, 258, L89
- Huxley VH, 1991, Am J Physiol, 260, H1645
- Vink H, 2000, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 278, H285, 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.1.H285 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Monsieurs, K. G., Nolan, J. P., Bossaert, L. L., Greif, R., Maconochie, I. K., Nikolaou, N. I., Perkins, G. D., Soar, J., Truhlář, A., Wyllie, J., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038 · Cited by 915
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people
Lewis, S. R., Pritchard, M. W., Evans, D. J., Butler, A. R., Alderson, P., Smith, A. F., & Roberts, I. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000567.pub7 · Cited by 315
Haase, N., Perner, A., Hennings, L. I., Siegemund, M., Lauridsen, B., Wetterslev, M., & Wetterslev, J. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f839 · Cited by 310
Whitehorn, J., & Simmons, C. P. (2011) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.022 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Wills, B. A., Dung, N. M., Loan, H. T., Tam, D. T. H., Thuy, T. T. N., Minh, L. T. T., Diet, T. V., Hao, N. T., Chau, N. V., Stepniewska, K., White, N. J., & Farrar, J. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 353
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 877-889
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2132269368
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Three Fluid Solutions for Resuscitation in Dengue Shock Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa044057
- The paper
- Wills, B. A., Dung, N. M., Loan, H. T., Tam, D. T. H., Thuy, T. T. N., Minh, L. T. T., Diet, T. V., Hao, N. T., Chau, N. V., Stepniewska, K., White, N. J., & Farrar, J. J. (2005). Comparison of Three Fluid Solutions for Resuscitation in Dengue Shock Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa044057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.