Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Pooled Analysis of Bone Marrow Micrometastasis in Breast Cancer

Open access
Braun, Stephan, Vogl, Florian D., Naume, Bjørn, Janni, Wolfgang, Osborne, Michael P., Coombes, R. Charles, Schlimok, Günter, Diel, Ingo J., Gerber, Bernd, Gebauer, Gerhard, Pierga, Jean-Yves, Marth, Christian, Oruzio, Daniel, Wiedswang, Gro, Solomayer, Erich-Franz, Kundt, Günther, Strobl, Barbara, Fehm, Tanja, Wong, George Y.C., Bliss, Judith, Vincent-Salomon, Anne, Pantel, Klaus·2005·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the prognostic significance of the presence of micrometastasis in the bone marrow at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer by means of a pooled analysis. METHODS: We combined individual patient data from nine studies involving 4703 patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer. We evaluated patient outcomes over a 10-year follow-up period (median, 5.2 years), using a multivariable piecewise Cox regression model. RESULTS: Micrometastasis was detected in 30.6 percent of the patients. As compared with women without bone marrow micrometastasis, patients with bone marrow micrometastasis had larger tumors and tumors with a higher histologic grade and more often had lymph-node metastases and hormone receptor-negative tumors (P<0.001 for all variables). The presence of micrometastasis was a significant prognostic factor with respect to poor overall survival and breast-cancer-specific survival (univariate mortality ratios, 2.15 and 2.44, respectively; P<0.001 for both outcomes) and poor disease-free survival and distant-disease-free survival during the 10-year observation period (incidence-rate ratios, 2.13 and 2.33, respectively; P<0.001 for both outcomes). In the multivariable analysis, micrometastasis was an independent predictor of a poor outcome. In the univariate subgroup analysis, breast-cancer-specific survival among patients with micrometastasis was significantly shortened (P<0.001 for all comparisons) among those receiving adjuvant endocrine treatment (mortality ratio, 3.22) or cytotoxic therapy (mortality ratio, 2.32) and among patients who had tumors no larger than 2 cm in diameter without lymph-node metastasis and who did not receive systemic adjuvant therapy (mortality ratio, 3.65). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of micrometastasis in the bone marrow at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa050434

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 1,379

Metadata

Authors
Braun, S., Vogl, F. D., Naume, B., Janni, W., Osborne, M. P., Coombes, R. C., Schlimok, G., Diel, I. J., Gerber, B., Gebauer, G., Pierga, J.-Y., Marth, C., Oruzio, D., Wiedswang, G., Solomayer, E.-F., Kundt, G., Strobl, B., Fehm, T., Wong, G. Y. C., Bliss, J., Vincent-Salomon, A., & Pantel, K.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2005-08-25
Volume
353
Issue
8
Pages
793-802
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2068503417
Cited by
1,379
References
23
FWCI
23.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Pooled Analysis of Bone Marrow Micrometastasis in Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa050434
The paper
Braun, S., Vogl, F. D., Naume, B., Janni, W., Osborne, M. P., Coombes, R. C., Schlimok, G., Diel, I. J., Gerber, B., Gebauer, G., Pierga, J.-Y., Marth, C., Oruzio, D., Wiedswang, G., Solomayer, E.-F., Kundt, G., Strobl, B., Fehm, T., Wong, G. Y. C., . . . Pantel, K. (2005). A Pooled Analysis of Bone Marrow Micrometastasis in Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa050434

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.