Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 631

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From latent disseminated cells to overt metastasis: Genetic analysis of systemic breast cancer progression

Open access
Schmidt-Kittler, Oleg, Ragg, Thomas, Daskalakis, Angela, Granzow, Martin, Ahr, Andre, Blankenstein, Thomas J. F., Kaufmann, Manfred, Diebold, Joachim, Arnholdt, Hans, Müller, Peter, Bischoff, Joachim, Harich, Detlev, Schlimok, Günter, Riethmüller, Gert, Eils, Roland, Klein, Christoph A.·2003·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

According to the present view, metastasis marks the end in a sequence of genomic changes underlying the progression of an epithelial cell to a lethal cancer. Here, we aimed to find out at what stage of tumor development transformed cells leave the primary tumor and whether a defined genotype corresponds to metastatic disease. To this end, we isolated single disseminated cancer cells from bone marrow of breast cancer patients and performed single-cell comparative genomic hybridization. We analyzed disseminated tumor cells from patients after curative resection of the primary tumor (stage M0), as presumptive progenitors of manifest metastasis, and from patients with manifest metastasis (stage M1). Their genomic data were compared with those from microdissected areas of matched primary tumors. Disseminated cells from M0-stage patients displayed significantly fewer chromosomal aberrations than primary tumors or cells from M1-stage patients ( P < 0.008 and P < 0.0001, respectively), and their aberrations appeared to be randomly generated. In contrast, primary tumors and M1 cells harbored different and characteristic chromosomal imbalances. Moreover, applying machine-learning methods for the classification of the genotypes, we could correctly identify the presence or absence of metastatic disease in a patient on the basis of a single-cell genome. We suggest that in breast cancer, tumor cells may disseminate in a far less progressed genomic state than previously thought, and that they acquire genomic aberrations typical of metastatic cells thereafter. Thus, our data challenge the widely held view that the precursors of metastasis are derived from the most advanced clone within the primary tumor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1331931100

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 631

Metadata

Authors
Schmidt-Kittler, O., Ragg, T., Daskalakis, A., Granzow, M., Ahr, A., Blankenstein, T. J. F., Kaufmann, M., Diebold, J., Arnholdt, H., Müller, P., Bischoff, J., Harich, D., Schlimok, G., Riethmüller, G., Eils, R., & Klein, C. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-06-13
Volume
100
Issue
13
Pages
7737-7742
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2138022504
Cited by
631
References
3
FWCI
11.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From latent disseminated cells to overt metastasis: Genetic analysis of systemic breast cancer progression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1331931100
The paper
Schmidt-Kittler, O., Ragg, T., Daskalakis, A., Granzow, M., Ahr, A., Blankenstein, T. J. F., Kaufmann, M., Diebold, J., Arnholdt, H., Müller, P., Bischoff, J., Harich, D., Schlimok, G., Riethmüller, G., Eils, R., & Klein, C. A. (2003). From latent disseminated cells to overt metastasis: Genetic analysis of systemic breast cancer progression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1331931100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.