The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pulmonary-Artery versus Central Venous Catheter to Guide Treatment of Acute Lung Injury
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The balance between the benefits and the risks of pulmonary-artery catheters (PACs) has not been established. METHODS: We evaluated the relationship of benefits and risks of PACs in 1000 patients with established acute lung injury in a randomized trial comparing hemodynamic management guided by a PAC with hemodynamic management guided by a central venous catheter (CVC) using an explicit management protocol. Mortality during the first 60 days before discharge home was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The groups had similar baseline characteristics. The rates of death during the first 60 days before discharge home were similar in the PAC and CVC groups (27.4 percent and 26.3 percent, respectively; P=0.69; absolute difference, 1.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -4.4 to 6.6 percent), as were the mean (+/-SE) numbers of both ventilator-free days (13.2+/-0.5 and 13.5+/-0.5; P=0.58) and days not spent in the intensive care unit (12.0+/-0.4 and 12.5+/-0.5; P=0.40) to day 28. PAC-guided therapy did not improve these measures for patients in shock at the time of enrollment. There were no significant differences between groups in lung or kidney function, rates of hypotension, ventilator settings, or use of dialysis or vasopressors. Approximately 90 percent of protocol instructions were followed in both groups, with a 1 percent rate of crossover from CVC- to PAC-guided therapy. Fluid balance was similar in the two groups, as was the proportion of instructions given for fluid and diuretics. Dobutamine use was uncommon. The PAC group had approximately twice as many catheter-related complications (predominantly arrhythmias). CONCLUSIONS: PAC-guided therapy did not improve survival or organ function but was associated with more complications than CVC-guided therapy. These results, when considered with those of previous studies, suggest that the PAC should not be routinely used for the management of acute lung injury. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00281268.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005043421801 · Cited by 12,941
Bernard, G. R., Artigas, A., Brigham, K. L., Carlet, J., Falke, K., Hudson, L., Lamy, M., Legall, J. R., Morris, A., & Spragg, R. (1994) · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.7509706 · Cited by 6,746
Connors, A. F., McCaffree, D. R., & Gray, B. A. (1983) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198302033080508 · Cited by 365
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1097/00003246-198407000-00001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1378/chest.99.6.1451 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00134-002-1354-y · DOI
- 10.1097/00000658-197212000-00014 · doi:10.1097/00000658-197212000-00014
- 10.1056/NEJM197107222850402 · DOI · Paper page
- Marinelli WA, 1999, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 160, 69, 10.1164/ajrccm.160.1.9711079 · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.160.1.9711079
- 10.1097/00003246-199404000-00011 · DOI · Paper page
- Chalfin DB, 1997, New Horiz, 5, 292
- 10.1097/00005373-198504000-00005 · DOI
- 10.1378/chest.94.6.1176 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.294.13.1664 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00003246-199702000-00003 · doi:10.1097/00003246-199702000-00003
- 10.1001/jama.264.22.2928 · doi:10.1001/jama.264.22.2928 · Paper page
- 10.1097/00003246-200206000-00003 · doi:10.1097/00003246-200206000-00003
- Burns D, 1996, Am J Crit Care, 5, 49, 10.4037/ajcc1996.5.1.49 · doi:10.4037/ajcc1996.5.1.49
- 10.1007/s00134-003-1924-7 · doi:10.1007/s00134-003-1924-7
- 10.1097/00003246-199207000-00006 · doi:10.1097/00003246-199207000-00006
- 10.1097/00003246-200106000-00010 · DOI
- 10.1378/chest.92.4.721 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1378/chest.98.6.1331 · doi:10.1378/chest.98.6.1331
- 10.1378/chest.128.4.2722 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.12.018 · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.12.018
- 10.1001/jama.286.3.309 · doi:10.1001/jama.286.3.309
- 10.1001/jama.276.11.889 · doi:10.1001/jama.276.11.889 · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.283.19.2568 · DOI · Paper page
- Robin ED, 1985, Ann Intern Med, 103, 445, 10.7326/0003-4819-103-3-445 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.276.11.916 · doi:10.1001/jama.276.11.916
- 10.1001/jama.286.3.348 · DOI
- Guyatt G, 1991, J Intensive Care Med, 6, 91, 10.1177/088506669100600204 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa021108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.290.20.2713 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67061-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.294.13.1625 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00134-002-1206-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Morris AH, 2000, Ann Intern Med, 132, 373, 10.7326/0003-4819-132-5-200003070-00007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00075198-200306000-00012 · DOI
- Ivanov RI, 1997, New Horiz, 5, 268
- Walker MB, 1994, Clin Intensive Care, 5, 15
- 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.446 · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7284.446
- 10.1097/01.CCM.0000150650.70142.E9 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMe030031 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMhpr030349 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMp038133 · DOI
Cited by
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016.
Rhodes, A., Evans, L. E., Alhazzani, W., Levy, M. M., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., Kumar, A., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Nunnally, M. E., et al. (2017) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 · Cited by 6,621
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016.
Rhodes, A., Evans, L. E., Alhazzani, W., Levy, M. M., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., Kumar, A., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Nunnally, M. E., et al. (2017) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000002255 · Cited by 3,652
Comparison of Two Fluid-Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury
(2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa062200 · Cited by 3,538
Self-citationAcute respiratory distress syndrome
Matthay, M. A., Zemans, R. L., Zimmerman, G. A., Arabi, Y. M., Beitler, J. R., Mercat, A., Herridge, M., Randolph, A. G., & Calfee, C. S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0069-0 · Cited by 2,387
Metadata
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2006-05-25
- Volume
- 354
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2213-2224
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2326364273
- Cited by
- 980
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 81.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulmonary-Artery versus Central Venous Catheter to Guide Treatment of Acute Lung Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa061895
- The paper
- Pulmonary-Artery versus Central Venous Catheter to Guide Treatment of Acute Lung Injury. (2006). New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa061895
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.