Cited by 66Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Cardiac Outcomes After Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Effects of Pioglitazone in Patients With Insulin Resistance Without Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
Young, Lawrence H., Viscoli, Catherine M., Curtis, Jeptha P., Inzucchi, Silvio E., Schwartz, Gregory G., Lovejoy, Anne M., Furie, Karen L., Gorman, Mark J. +7 more·2017·Circulation

Abstract

Background: Insulin resistance is highly prevalent among patients with atherosclerosis and is associated with an increased risk for myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. The IRIS trial (Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke) demonstrated that pioglitazone decreased the composite risk for fatal or nonfatal stroke and MI in patients with insulin resistance without diabetes mellitus, after a recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The type and severity of cardiac events in this population and the impact of pioglitazone on these events have not been described. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the effects of pioglitazone, in comparison with placebo, on acute coronary syndromes (MI and unstable angina) among IRIS participants. All potential acute coronary syndrome episodes were adjudicated in a blinded fashion by an independent clinical events committee. Results: The study cohort was composed of 3876 IRIS participants, mean age 63 years, 65% male, 89% white race, and 12% with a history of coronary artery disease. Over a median follow-up of 4.8 years, there were 225 acute coronary syndrome events, including 141 MIs and 84 episodes of unstable angina. The MIs included 28 (19%) with ST-segment elevation. The majority of MIs were type 1 (94, 65%), followed by type 2 (45, 32%). Serum troponin was 10× to 100× upper limit of normal in 49 (35%) and >100× upper limit of normal in 39 (28%). Pioglitazone reduced the risk of acute coronary syndrome (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.54–0.94; P =0.02). Pioglitazone also reduced the risk of type 1 MI (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.96; log-rank P =0.03), but not type 2 MI (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–1.91; P =0.87). Similarly, pioglitazone reduced the risk of large MIs with serum troponin >100× upper limit of normal (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.22–0.87; P =0.02), but not smaller MIs. Conclusions: Among patients with insulin resistance without diabetes mellitus, pioglitazone reduced the risk for acute coronary syndromes after a recent cerebrovascular event. Pioglitazone appeared to have its most prominent effect in preventing spontaneous type 1 MIs. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00091949.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.116.024863

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, L. H., Viscoli, C. M., Curtis, J. P., Inzucchi, S. E., Schwartz, G. G., Lovejoy, A. M., Furie, K. L., Gorman, M. J., Conwit, R., Abbott, J. D., Jacoby, D. L., Kolansky, D. M., Pfau, S. E., Ling, F. S., & Kernan, W. N.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2017-05-16
Volume
135
Issue
20
Pages
1882-1893
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2892426086
Cited by
66
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS044876)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
pioglitazone, insulin resistance, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, type 1 myocardial infarction, type 2 myocardial infarction, serum troponin, IRIS trial, secondary prevention, thiazolidinediones, cardiac outcomes, atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Pioglitazone, Aged, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Stroke, Internationality, Thiazolidinediones, Acute Coronary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review