Cited by 1,149Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCancer survivorship and care

Patients’ expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer

Open access
Weeks, Jane C., Catalano, Paul J., Cronin, Angel, Finkelman, Matthew D., Mack, Jennifer W., Keating, Nancy L., Schrag, Deborah·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy for metastatic lung or colorectal cancer can prolong life by weeks or months and may provide palliation, but it is not curative. METHODS: We studied 1193 patients participating in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study (a national, prospective, observational cohort study) who were alive 4 months after diagnosis and received chemotherapy for newly diagnosed metastatic (stage IV) lung or colorectal cancer. We sought to characterize the prevalence of the expectation that chemotherapy might be curative and to identify the clinical, sociodemographic, and health-system factors associated with this expectation. Data were obtained from a patient survey by professional interviewers in addition to a comprehensive review of medical records. RESULTS: Overall, 69% of patients with lung cancer and 81% of those with colorectal cancer did not report understanding that chemotherapy was not at all likely to cure their cancer. In multivariable logistic regression, the risk of reporting inaccurate beliefs about chemotherapy was higher among patients with colorectal cancer, as compared with those with lung cancer (odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 2.37); among nonwhite and Hispanic patients, as compared with non-Hispanic white patients (odds ratio for Hispanic patients, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.51 to 5.27; odds ratio for black patients, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.80 to 4.78); and among patients who rated their communication with their physician very favorably, as compared with less favorably (odds ratio for highest third vs. lowest third, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.72). Educational level, functional status, and the patient's role in decision making were not associated with such inaccurate beliefs about chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients receiving chemotherapy for incurable cancers may not understand that chemotherapy is unlikely to be curative, which could compromise their ability to make informed treatment decisions that are consonant with their preferences. Physicians may be able to improve patients' understanding, but this may come at the cost of patients' satisfaction with them. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1204410

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weeks, J. C., Catalano, P. J., Cronin, A., Finkelman, M. D., Mack, J. W., Keating, N. L., & Schrag, D.
Affiliations
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-10-25
Volume
367
Issue
17
Pages
1616-1625
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2160733129
Cited by
1,149
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 112 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 6
FWCI
168.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ca093344-08)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA093339, U01CA093326, U01-CA093344, U01CA093348, U01CA093329, U01CA093332, U01CA093324)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
metastatic lung cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, treatment knowledge, physician-patient communication, racial and ethnic disparities, palliative chemotherapy, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Data Collection, Decision Making, Drug Therapy, Female, Humans, Informed Consent, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Colorectal Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review