Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Intensive Blood-Pressure Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes

Open access
Berlowitz, Dan R., Foy, Capri G., Kazis, Lewis E., Bolin, Linda P., Conroy, Molly B., Fitzpatrick, Peter, Gure, Tanya R., Kimmel, Paul L., Kirchner, Kent, Morisky, Donald E., Newman, Jill, Olney, Christine, Oparil, Suzanne, Pajewski, Nicholas M., Powell, James, Ramsey, Thomas, Simmons, Debra L., Snyder, Joni, Supiano, Mark A., Weiner, Daniel E., Whittle, Jeff·2017·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The previously published results of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial showed that among participants with hypertension and an increased cardiovascular risk, but without diabetes, the rates of cardiovascular events were lower among those who were assigned to a target systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) than among those who were assigned to a target of less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment). Whether such intensive treatment affected patient-reported outcomes was uncertain; those results from the trial are reported here. METHODS: We randomly assigned 9361 participants with hypertension to a systolic blood-pressure target of less than 120 mm Hg or a target of less than 140 mm Hg. Patient-reported outcome measures included the scores on the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9), patient-reported satisfaction with their blood-pressure care and blood-pressure medications, and adherence to blood-pressure medications. We compared the scores in the intensive-treatment group with those in the standard-treatment group among all participants and among participants stratified according to physical and cognitive function. RESULTS: Participants who received intensive treatment received an average of one additional antihypertensive medication, and the systolic blood pressure was 14.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 14.3 to 15.4) lower in the group that received intensive treatment than in the group that received standard treatment. Mean PCS, MCS, and PHQ-9 scores were relatively stable over a median of 3 years of follow-up, with no significant differences between the two treatment groups. No significant differences between the treatment groups were noted when participants were stratified according to baseline measures of physical or cognitive function. Satisfaction with blood-pressure care was high in both treatment groups, and we found no significant difference in adherence to blood-pressure medications. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcomes among participants who received intensive treatment, which targeted a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, were similar to those among participants who received standard treatment, including among participants with decreased physical or cognitive function. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; SPRINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01206062 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1611179

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Berlowitz, D. R., Foy, C. G., Kazis, L. E., Bolin, L. P., Conroy, M. B., Fitzpatrick, P., Gure, T. R., Kimmel, P. L., Kirchner, K., Morisky, D. E., Newman, J., Olney, C., Oparil, S., Pajewski, N. M., Powell, J., Ramsey, T., Simmons, D. L., Snyder, J., Supiano, M. A., Weiner, D. E., & Whittle, J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2017-08-24
Volume
377
Issue
8
Pages
733-744
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2747267102
Cited by
282
References
32
FWCI
16.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Intensive Blood-Pressure Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1611179
The paper
Berlowitz, D. R., Foy, C. G., Kazis, L. E., Bolin, L. P., Conroy, M. B., Fitzpatrick, P., Gure, T. R., Kimmel, P. L., Kirchner, K., Morisky, D. E., Newman, J., Olney, C., Oparil, S., Pajewski, N. M., Powell, J., Ramsey, T., Simmons, D. L., Snyder, J., Supiano, M. A., . . . Whittle, J. (2017). Effect of Intensive Blood-Pressure Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1611179

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.