The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Intensive Blood-Pressure Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The previously published results of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial showed that among participants with hypertension and an increased cardiovascular risk, but without diabetes, the rates of cardiovascular events were lower among those who were assigned to a target systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) than among those who were assigned to a target of less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment). Whether such intensive treatment affected patient-reported outcomes was uncertain; those results from the trial are reported here. METHODS: We randomly assigned 9361 participants with hypertension to a systolic blood-pressure target of less than 120 mm Hg or a target of less than 140 mm Hg. Patient-reported outcome measures included the scores on the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9), patient-reported satisfaction with their blood-pressure care and blood-pressure medications, and adherence to blood-pressure medications. We compared the scores in the intensive-treatment group with those in the standard-treatment group among all participants and among participants stratified according to physical and cognitive function. RESULTS: Participants who received intensive treatment received an average of one additional antihypertensive medication, and the systolic blood pressure was 14.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 14.3 to 15.4) lower in the group that received intensive treatment than in the group that received standard treatment. Mean PCS, MCS, and PHQ-9 scores were relatively stable over a median of 3 years of follow-up, with no significant differences between the two treatment groups. No significant differences between the treatment groups were noted when participants were stratified according to baseline measures of physical or cognitive function. Satisfaction with blood-pressure care was high in both treatment groups, and we found no significant difference in adherence to blood-pressure medications. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcomes among participants who received intensive treatment, which targeted a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, were similar to those among participants who received standard treatment, including among participants with decreased physical or cognitive function. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; SPRINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01206062 .).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Retracted: Predictive Validity of a Medication Adherence Measure in an Outpatient Setting
Morisky, D. E., Ang, A., Krousel‐Wood, M., & Ward, H. J. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Hypertension · doi:10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x · Cited by 2,877
Self-citationRetractedThe PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control
The SPRINT Research Group (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1511939 · Cited by 6,325
Monitoring Depression Treatment Outcomes With the Patient Health Questionnaire-9
L??we, B., Un??tzer, J., Callahan, C. M., Perkins, A. J., & Kroenke, K. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200412000-00006 · Cited by 1,354
The Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy on the Quality of Life
Croog, S. H., Levine, S., Testa, M. A., Brown, B., Bulpitt, C. J., Jenkins, C. D., Klerman, G. L., & Williams, G. H. (1986) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198606263142602 · Cited by 1,325
Williamson, J. D., Supiano, M. A., Applegate, W. B., Berlowitz, D. R., Campbell, R. C., Chertow, G. M., Fine, L. J., Haley, W. E., Hawfield, A. T., Ix, J. H., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.7050 · Cited by 1,261
Self-citationUpdated U.S. population standard for the Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12)
Selim, A. J., Rogers, W., Fleishman, J. A., Qian, S. X., Fincke, B. G., Rothendler, J. A., & Kazis, L. E. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9418-2 · Cited by 602
Self-citationWare, J. E. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.276.13.1039b · Cited by 556
Ambrosius, W. T., Sink, K. M., Foy, C. G., Berlowitz, D. R., Cheung, A. K., Cushman, W. C., Fine, L. J., Goff, D. C., Johnson, K. C., Killeen, A. A., et al. (2014) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774514537404 · Cited by 544
Self-citation
Cited by
Williamson (2019) · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.21442 · Cited by 1,246
Oparil, S., Acelajado, M. C., Bakris, G. L., Berlowitz, D. R., Cífková, R., Dominiczak, A. F., Grassi, G., Jordan, J., Poulter, N. R., Rodgers, A., et al. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2018.14 · Cited by 1,167
Self-citationDiagnosis of Early Alzheimer's Disease: Clinical Practice in 2021
Porsteinsson, A. P., Isaacson, R. S., Knox, S., Sabbagh, M. N., & Rubino, I. (2021) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.14283/jpad.2021.23 · Cited by 744
A Community-Based Intervention for Managing Hypertension in Rural South Asia
Jafar, T. H., Gandhi, M., de Silva, H. A., Jehan, I., Naheed, A., Finkelstein, E. A., Turner, E. L., Morisky, D., Kasturiratne, A., Khan, A. H., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1911965 · Cited by 303
Self-citationBhanu, C., Nimmons, D., Petersen, I., Orlu, M., Davis, D., Hussain, H., Magammanage, S., & Walters, K. (2021) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003821 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Berlowitz, D. R., Foy, C. G., Kazis, L. E., Bolin, L. P., Conroy, M. B., Fitzpatrick, P., Gure, T. R., Kimmel, P. L., Kirchner, K., Morisky, D. E., Newman, J., Olney, C., Oparil, S., Pajewski, N. M., Powell, J., Ramsey, T., Simmons, D. L., Snyder, J., Supiano, M. A., Weiner, D. E., & Whittle, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2017-08-24
- Volume
- 377
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 733-744
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2747267102
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 16.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Intensive Blood-Pressure Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1611179
- The paper
- Berlowitz, D. R., Foy, C. G., Kazis, L. E., Bolin, L. P., Conroy, M. B., Fitzpatrick, P., Gure, T. R., Kimmel, P. L., Kirchner, K., Morisky, D. E., Newman, J., Olney, C., Oparil, S., Pajewski, N. M., Powell, J., Ramsey, T., Simmons, D. L., Snyder, J., Supiano, M. A., . . . Whittle, J. (2017). Effect of Intensive Blood-Pressure Treatment on Patient-Reported Outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1611179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.