Cited by 1,711Epilepsy research and treatmentCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchDiet and metabolism studies

Trial of Cannabidiol for Drug-Resistant Seizures in the Dravet Syndrome

Open access
Devinsky, Orrin, Cross, J. Helen, Laux, Linda, Marsh, Eric, Miller, Ian, Nabbout, Rima, Scheffer, Ingrid E., Thiele, Elizabeth A. +1 more·2017·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Dravet syndrome is a complex childhood epilepsy disorder that is associated with drug-resistant seizures and a high mortality rate. We studied cannabidiol for the treatment of drug-resistant seizures in the Dravet syndrome. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 120 children and young adults with the Dravet syndrome and drug-resistant seizures to receive either cannabidiol oral solution at a dose of 20 mg per kilogram of body weight per day or placebo, in addition to standard antiepileptic treatment. The primary end point was the change in convulsive-seizure frequency over a 14-week treatment period, as compared with a 4-week baseline period. RESULTS: The median frequency of convulsive seizures per month decreased from 12.4 to 5.9 with cannabidiol, as compared with a decrease from 14.9 to 14.1 with placebo (adjusted median difference between the cannabidiol group and the placebo group in change in seizure frequency, -22.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -41.1 to -5.4; P=0.01). The percentage of patients who had at least a 50% reduction in convulsive-seizure frequency was 43% with cannabidiol and 27% with placebo (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.93 to 4.30; P=0.08). The patient's overall condition improved by at least one category on the seven-category Caregiver Global Impression of Change scale in 62% of the cannabidiol group as compared with 34% of the placebo group (P=0.02). The frequency of total seizures of all types was significantly reduced with cannabidiol (P=0.03), but there was no significant reduction in nonconvulsive seizures. The percentage of patients who became seizure-free was 5% with cannabidiol and 0% with placebo (P=0.08). Adverse events that occurred more frequently in the cannabidiol group than in the placebo group included diarrhea, vomiting, fatigue, pyrexia, somnolence, and abnormal results on liver-function tests. There were more withdrawals from the trial in the cannabidiol group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with the Dravet syndrome, cannabidiol resulted in a greater reduction in convulsive-seizure frequency than placebo and was associated with higher rates of adverse events. (Funded by GW Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02091375 .).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1611618

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A phase 2 RCT of soticlestat in patients with Dravet syndrome showed a significant placebo-adjusted median reduction in convulsive seizure frequency of 46% over the full treatment period, whereas reduction in drop seizures in those with LGS was not significant.

    “A phase 2 RCT of soticlestat in patients with Dravet syndrome showed a significant placebo-adjusted median reduction in convulsive seizure frequency of 46% over the full treatment period, whereas reduction in drop seizures in those with LGS was not significant 188,191 .”

    From Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (2024) · cites this paper as [188]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of cannabidiol demonstrated efficacy in Dravet syndrome, LGS and TSC, with significant median percent reductions in target seizures compared with placebo of 38.9%, 41.9% and 48.6%.

    “Randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of cannabidiol demonstrated efficacy in Dravet syndrome, LGS and TSC, with significant median percent reductions in target seizures compared with placebo of 38.9% 188 , 41.9% 189 and 48.6% 190 .”

    From Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (2024) · cites this paper as [188]

  • Open-blind and double-blind controlled clinical trials confirmed and expanded preliminary findings on the efficacy, security and tolerability of CBD in children and adolescents with treatment-resistant epilepsy, particularly Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes.

    “More recently, open-blind and double-blind, controlled clinical trials investigated the efficacy, security and tolerability of CBD in children and adolescents with treatment-resistant epilepsy (particularly Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes) confirmed and expanded these preliminary findings (137–140).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Trembly B, Sherman M. Double-blind clinical study of cannabidiol as a second- ary anticonvulsant. Presented at the Mari- juana '90 International Conference on Cannabis and Cannabinoids, Kolympari, Crete, July 8-11, 1990.
  2. Statistical review and evaluation: anti- epileptic drugs and suicidality. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administra- tion, 2008 (http://www .fda .gov/ downloads/ drugs/ drugsafety/ postmarketdrugsafety informationforpatientsandproviders/ ucm192556 .pdf).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devinsky, O., Cross, J. H., Laux, L., Marsh, E., Miller, I., Nabbout, R., Scheffer, I. E., Thiele, E. A., & Wright, S.
Affiliations
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2017-05-25
Volume
376
Issue
21
Pages
2011-2020
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2620218661
Cited by
1,711
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 160 · 2024: 150 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 211 · 2020: 287 · 2019: 204 · 2018: 166 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 2
FWCI
156.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0515-10073)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
Dravet syndrome, cannabidiol, refractory seizures, pediatric epilepsy, anticonvulsant therapy, seizure reduction, adverse events, liver function tests, nonconvulsive seizures, seizure-free rate, trial withdrawal, fever, diarrhea, sleepiness, fatigue, antiepileptic drug resistance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anticonvulsants, Cannabidiol, Child, Child, Preschool, Double-Blind Method, Epilepsies, Myoclonic, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Liver, Liver Function Tests, Male, Seizures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review