Cited by 75Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesPharmacy and Medical Practices

“Is medical cannabis safe for my patients?” A practical review of cannabis safety considerations

Open access
MacCallum, Caroline A., Lo, Lindsay A., Boivin, Michael·2021·European Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Medical cannabis use is increasing worldwide. Clinicians are commonly asked by patients to provide guidance on its safety and efficacy. Although there has been an increase in research on the role of medical cannabis for a number of different conditions, we found that there was a paucity of clear safety guidance on its use. We aim to address this issue by answering two pertinent clinician safety questions: 1 Can medical cannabis be safely used in this patient? 2. What strategies can be used to ensure that any harms from medical cannabis are mitigated? To address these questions, we reviewed available evidence and provided expert clinical opinion to summarize the fundamental components for evaluating medical cannabis safety and strategies to reduce risk from its use. Our review resulted in a safety-focused framework for medical cannabis initiation and utilization. We provide clear recommendations for patients being considered for cannabis (e.g. precautions, contraindications and drug interactions). Risk mitigation strategies such as appropriate chemovar (strain) selection, routes of administration, and dosing are reviewed. As with any other pharmacotherapy, we review the key components of monitoring and address potential issues that may arise while using medical cannabis. We propose a structured assessment and monitoring strategy that can be used by clinicians recommending cannabis (CRC) to guide patients through each step of their cannabis journey. This framework can be used to ensure that medical cannabis utilization is associated with the lowest possible risk to the patient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.05.002

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacCallum, C. A., Lo, L. A., & Boivin, M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
MacCallum, Caroline A.
Venue
European Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
89
Pages
10-18
ISSN
0953-6205 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3164368172
Cited by
71
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medical cannabis, cannabis safety, risk mitigation, drug interactions, contraindications, route of administration, dosage, patient monitoring, cannabis initiation
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Cannabidiol, Cannabis, Drug Interactions, Humans, Medical Marijuana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review