Cited by 673Vitamin D Research StudiesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementNutritional Studies and Diet

Vitamin D supplementation and prevention of type 2 diabetes

Open access
Pittas, Anastassios G., Dawson-Hughes, Bess, Sheehan, Patricia, Ware, James H., Knowler, William C., Aroda, Vanita R., Brodsky, Irwin, Ceglia, Lisa +27 more·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUNDObservational studies support an association between a low blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and the risk of type 2 diabetes.However, whether vitamin D supplementation lowers the risk of diabetes is unknown. METHODSWe randomly assigned adults who met at least two of three glycemic criteria for prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose level, 100 to 125 mg per deciliter; plasma glucose level 2 hours after a 75-g oral glucose load, 140 to 199 mg per deciliter; and glycated hemoglobin level, 5.7 to 6.4%) and no diagnostic criteria for diabetes to receive 4000 IU per day of vitamin D 3 or placebo, regardless of the baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level.The primary outcome in this time-to-event analysis was new-onset diabetes, and the trial design was event-driven, with a target number of diabetes events of 508. RESULTSA total of 2423 participants underwent randomization (1211 to the vitamin D group and 1212 to the placebo group).By month 24, the mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level in the vitamin D group was 54.3 ng per milliliter (from 27.7 ng per milliliter at baseline), as compared with 28.8 ng per milliliter in the placebo group (from 28.2 ng per milliliter at baseline).After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the primary outcome of diabetes occurred in 293 participants in the vitamin D group and 323 in the placebo group (9.39 and 10.66 events per 100 person-years, respectively).The hazard ratio for vitamin D as compared with placebo was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.04; P = 0.12).The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONSAmong persons at high risk for type 2 diabetes not selected for vitamin D insufficiency, vitamin D 3 supplementation at a dose of 4000 IU per day did not result in a significantly lower risk of diabetes than placebo.(Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; D2d ClinicalTrials.govnumber, NCT01942694.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1900906

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011. 21796828

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pittas, A. G., Dawson-Hughes, B., Sheehan, P., Ware, J. H., Knowler, W. C., Aroda, V. R., Brodsky, I., Ceglia, L., Chadha, C., Chatterjee, R., Desouza, C., Dolor, R., Foreyt, J., Fuss, P., Ghazi, A., Hsia, D. S., Johnson, K. C., Kashyap, S. R., Kim, S., LeBlanc, E. S., Lewis, M. R., Liao, E., Neff, L. M., Nelson, J., O’Neil, P., Park, J., Peters, A., Phillips, L. S., Pratley, R., Raskin, P., Rasouli, N., Robbins, D., Rosen, C., Vickery, E. M., & Staten, M.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • From Tufts Medical Center (A.G.P., L.C., P.F., J.N., E.M.V.), the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University (B.D.-H.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (V.R.A.), and Harvard School of Public Health (J.H.W.), Boston, and the Spaulding Rehabilitation Network, Charlestown (P.S.) — all in Massachusetts; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Phoenix, AZ (W.C.K.); the Maine Medical Center (I.B.) and the Maine Medical Center Research Institute (C.R...
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-08-08
Volume
381
Issue
6
Pages
520-530
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2948994757
Cited by
673
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 50
FWCI
68.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association (1-14-D2d-01)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U34DK091958)
  • Office of Dietary Supplements (U01DK098245)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
vitamin D supplementation, vitamin D3, type 2 diabetes prevention, prediabetes, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, high-dose vitamin D, glycemic control, new-onset diabetes
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aged, Cholecalciferol, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prediabetic State, Risk Factors, Vitamin D, Vitamins, Treatment Failure, Disease-Free Survival, Dietary Supplements, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review