The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer may be guided by clinicopathological factors and a score based on a 21-gene assay to determine the risk of recurrence. Whether the level of clinical risk of breast cancer recurrence adds prognostic information to the recurrence score is not known. METHODS: We performed a prospective trial involving 9427 women with hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer, in whom an assay of 21 genes had been performed, and we classified the clinical risk of recurrence of breast cancer as low or high on the basis of the tumor size and histologic grade. The effect of clinical risk was evaluated by calculating hazard ratios for distant recurrence with the use of Cox proportional-hazards models. The initial endocrine therapy was tamoxifen alone in the majority of the premenopausal women who were 50 years of age or younger. RESULTS: The level of clinical risk was prognostic of distant recurrence in women with an intermediate 21-gene recurrence score of 11 to 25 (on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a worse prognosis or a greater potential benefit from chemotherapy) who were randomly assigned to endocrine therapy (hazard ratio for the comparison of high vs. low clinical risk, 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93 to 3.87) or to chemotherapy plus endocrine (chemoendocrine) therapy (hazard ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.66 to 3.48) and in women with a high recurrence score (a score of 26 to 100), all of whom were assigned to chemoendocrine therapy (hazard ratio, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.94 to 5.19). Among women who were 50 years of age or younger who had received endocrine therapy alone, the estimated (±SE) rate of distant recurrence at 9 years was less than 5% (≤1.8±0.9%) with a low recurrence score (a score of 0 to 10), irrespective of clinical risk, and 4.7±1.0% with an intermediate recurrence score and low clinical risk. In this age group, the estimated distant recurrence at 9 years exceeded 10% among women with a high clinical risk and an intermediate recurrence score who received endocrine therapy alone (12.3±2.4%) and among those with a high recurrence score who received chemoendocrine therapy (15.2±3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical-risk stratification provided prognostic information that, when added to the 21-gene recurrence score, could be used to identify premenopausal women who could benefit from more effective therapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00310180.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Obesity Is Associated with Inflammation and Elevated Aromatase Expression in the Mouse Mammary Gland
Subbaramaiah, K., Howe, L. R., Bhardwaj, P., Du, B., Gravaghi, C., Yantiss, R. K., Zhou, X. K., Blaho, V. A., Hla, T., Yang, P., et al. (2011) · Cancer Prevention Research · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.capr-10-0381 · Cited by 363
RetractedMatthews, D. R., Hosker, J. P., Rudenski, A. S., Naylor, B. A., Treacher, D. F., & Turner, R. C. (1985) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00280883 · Cited by 31,502
A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Paik, S., Shak, S., Tang, G., Kim, C., Baker, J., Cronin, M., Baehner, F. L., Walker, M. G., Watson, D., Park, T., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa041588 · Cited by 6,277
Self-citationPaik, S., Tang, G., Shak, S., Kim, C., Baker, J., Kim, W., Cronin, M., Baehner, F. L., Watson, D., Bryant, J., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.7985 · Cited by 2,579
Self-citationAdjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer
Sparano, J. A., Gray, R. J., Makower, D. F., Pritchard, K. I., Albain, K. S., Hayes, D. F., Geyer, C. E., Dees, E. C., Goetz, M. P., Olson, J. A., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1804710 · Cited by 2,397
Self-citationEarly Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61625-5 · Cited by 2,089
70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Cardoso, F., van’t Veer, L. J., Bogaerts, J., Slaets, L., Viale, G., Delaloge, S., Pierga, J.-Y., Brain, E., Causeret, S., DeLorenzi, M., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1602253 · Cited by 1,994
Self-citationGoss, P. E., Ingle, J. N., Martino, S., Robert, N. J., Muss, H. B., Piccart, M. J., Castiglione, M., Tu, D., Shepherd, L. E., Pritchard, K. I., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032312 · Cited by 1,795
Self-citationStatistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials
Wang, R., Lagakos, S. W., Ware, J. H., Hunter, D. J., & Drazen, J. M. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr077003 · Cited by 1,445
Cited by
Győrffy, B. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.07.014 · Cited by 1,648
Loibl, S., Poortmans, P., Morrow, M., Denkert, C., & Curigliano, G. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32381-3 · Cited by 1,648
Ganesh, K., & Massagué, J. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01195-4 · Cited by 1,051
Andre, F., Ismaila, N., Allison, K. H., Barlow, W. E., Collyar, D. E., Damodaran, S., Henry, N. L., Jhaveri, K., Kalinsky, K., Kuderer, N. M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.00069 · Cited by 365
Systemic Therapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Burstein, H. J. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1307118 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Sparano, J. A., Gray, R. J., Ravdin, P. M., Makower, D. F., Pritchard, K. I., Albain, K. S., Hayes, D. F., Geyer, C. E., Dees, E. C., Goetz, M. P., Olson, J. A., Lively, T., Badve, S. S., Saphner, T. J., Wagner, L. I., Whelan, T. J., Ellis, M. J., Paik, S., Wood, W. C., Keane, M. M., Gomez Moreno, H. L., Reddy, P. S., Goggins, T. F., Mayer, I. A., Brufsky, A. M., Toppmeyer, D. L., Kaklamani, V. G., Berenberg, J. L., Abrams, J., & Sledge, G. W.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2019-06-20
- Volume
- 380
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 2395-2405
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2948923376
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 20.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1904819
- The paper
- Sparano, J. A., Gray, R. J., Ravdin, P. M., Makower, D. F., Pritchard, K. I., Albain, K. S., Hayes, D. F., Geyer, C. E., Dees, E. C., Goetz, M. P., Olson, J. A., Lively, T., Badve, S. S., Saphner, T. J., Wagner, L. I., Whelan, T. J., Ellis, M. J., Paik, S., Wood, W. C., . . . Sledge, G. W. (2019). Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1904819
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.