Cited by 5Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Law and WelfareEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics

Elephants in captivity

Doyle, Catherine·2018·The Palgrave Handbook of Practical Animal Ethics

Abstract

Elephants are among the world’s most intelligent land mammals, with a social structure so complex it rivals that of human societies. When brought into captivity, elephants are subjected to conditions that are the opposite of the dynamic ecological and social environments to which they are evolutionarily adapted, causing varying degrees of physical and psychological deterioration, suffering, and premature death. Much of the debate over the welfare of captive elephants rightfully centers on these harms. However, far less attention is given to what it means for elephants when they are unable to fully engage in the seminal activities that define them as individuals. The ethical argument against confining elephants is rooted in the inherent limitations of captivity that make it impossible for these animals to wholly realize their physical, social, and cultural worlds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/978-1-137-36671-9_12

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doyle, C.
Corresponding author
Doyle, Catherine
Venue
The Palgrave Handbook of Practical Animal Ethics
Published
2018
Pages
181-206
OpenAlex
W2810451898
Cited by
5
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
captive elephants, animal welfare, animal ethics, animal cognition, social behavior, cultural behavior, animal suffering, animal rights, human-animal relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review