Cited by 49Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Successful acquisition of an olfactory discrimination test by Asian elephants, Elephas maximus

Arvidsson, Josefin, Amundin, Mats, Laska, Matthias·2012·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The present study demonstrates that Asian elephants, Elephas maximus, can successfully be trained to cooperate in an olfactory discrimination test based on a food-rewarded two-alternative instrumental conditioning procedure. The animals learned the basic principle of the test within only 60 trials and readily mastered intramodal stimulus transfer tasks. Further, they were capable of distinguishing between structurally related odor stimuli and remembered the reward value of previously learned odor stimuli after 2, 4, 8, and 16 weeks of recess without any signs of forgetting. The precision and consistency of the elephants' performance in tests of odor discrimination ability and long-term odor memory demonstrate the suitability of this method for assessing olfactory function in this proboscid species. An across-species comparison of several measures of olfactory learning capabilities such as speed of initial task acquisition and ability to master intramodal stimulus transfer tasks shows that Asian elephants are at least as good in their performance as mice, rats, and dogs, and clearly superior to nonhuman primates and fur seals. The results support the notion that Asian elephants may use olfactory cues for social communication and food selection and that the sense of smell may play an important role in the control of their behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.021

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asian elephants can learn to discriminate between structurally related chemical odorants in object-choice tasks, including chemical structures that only differ by one carbon.

    “Asian elephants can learn to discriminate between structurally related chemical odorants in object-choice tasks (Arvidsson et al., 2012; Rizvanovic et al., 2013), including chemical structures that only differ by one carbon (Rizvanovic et al., 2013).”
  • Asian elephants retain knowledge of which odors were rewarded and maintain accuracy when tested after 2, 4, 8, and 16 weeks and, in another study, after 3 weeks and 1 year.

    “They also retain knowledge of which odors were rewarded and maintain accuracy when tested after 2, 4, 8, and 16 weeks (Arvidsson et al., 2012) and, in another study, after 3 weeks and 1 year (Rizvanovic, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arvidsson, J., Amundin, M., & Laska, M.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Laska, Matthias
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
105
Issue
3
Pages
809-814
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107329463
Cited by
49
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Asian elephant, odor discrimination, olfactory memory, olfactory learning, operant conditioning, long-term memory retention, Proboscidea, olfactory communication, food choice
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Conditioning, Operant, Cues, Discrimination, Psychological, Elephants, Female, Food Preferences, Memory, Odorants, Reward, Smell, Transfer, Psychology, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review