Cited by 185Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Large brains and cognition: Where do elephants fit in?

Hart, Benjamin L., Hart, Lynette A., Pinter-Wollman, Noa·2008·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Among terrestrial mammals, elephants share the unique status, along with humans and great apes, of having large brains, being long-lived and having offspring that require long periods of dependency. Elephants have the largest brains of all terrestrial mammals, including the greatest volume of cerebral cortex. In contrast to what one might expect from such a large-brained species, the performance of elephants in cognitive feats, such as tool use, visual discrimination learning and tests of "insight" behavior, is unimpressive in comparison to the performance by chimpanzees and, of course, humans. Where elephants do seem to excel is in long-term, extensive spatial-temporal and social memory. In addition, elephants appear to be somewhat unique among non-human species in their reactions to disabled and deceased conspecifics, exhibiting behaviors that are mindful of "theory-of-mind" phenomena. Information gleaned from studies on the neural cytoarchitecture of large brains reveals that the neurons of the cerebral cortex of elephants are much less densely populated than in large-brained primates. The interactions between cortical neurons would appear to be more global and less compartmentalized into local areas, and cortical information processing slower, than in great apes and humans. Although focused neural cytoarchitecture studies on the elephant are needed, this comparative perspective on the cortical neural cytoarchitecture appears to relate to differences in behavior between elephants and their primate counterparts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.05.012

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hart, B. L., Hart, L. A., & Pinter-Wollman, N.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Hart, Benjamin L.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
86-98
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075821884
Cited by
185
References
82
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
elephants, brain size, cognition, cerebral cortex, spatial memory, social memory, tool use, visual discrimination learning, theory of mind, long-term memory, primate comparison
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Cognition, Elephants, Humans, Memory, Organ Size, Tool Use Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review