Cited by 223Technology Adoption and User BehaviourPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionInformation and Cyber Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users

Open access

Söllner, Matthias, Hoffmann, Axel, Leimeister, Jan Marco·2016·European Journal of Information Systems

DOI 10.1057/ejis.2015.17

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Technology acceptance research has shown that trust is an important factor fostering use of information systems (IS). As a result, numerous IS researchers have studied factors that build trust in I...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/ejis.2015.17

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Untitled work
(2014) · DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) · Cited by 12,785
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617 · Cited by 10,274

Show all 89 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

10.2307/4132332 · DOI · Paper page
Gordon ME, 1986, The Academy of Management Review, 11, 191
10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · DOI · Paper page
10.1093/sf/63.4.967 · DOI · Paper page
Mayer RC, 1995, Academy of Management Review, 20, 709, 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page
McKnight DH, 2011, ACM Transaction on Management Information Systems, 12, 12

Sorted by citations

Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies
Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543 · Cited by 963
“As trust is considered to be another significant predictor for the adoption of new technologies (Söllner et al., 2016), previous studies have investigated the connections between”
BackgroundInfluential
The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy
Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., & Teubner, T. (2018) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005 · Cited by 768
Trustworthy artificial intelligence
Thiebes, S., Lins, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4 · Cited by 595
Modelling and testing consumer trust dimensions in e-commerce.
Oliveira, T., Alhinho, M., Rita, P., & Dhillon, G. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.050 · Cited by 464
Impact of Trust and Privacy Concerns on Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: An Indian Perspective
Dhagarra, D., Goswami, M., & Kumar, G. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104164 · Cited by 517
How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents
Moussawi, S., Koufaris, M., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-020-00411-w · Cited by 406
Consumer attitude and intention to adopt mobile wallet in India – An empirical study
Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2019) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-09-2018-0256 · Cited by 518
The Emergence of Service Robots at Restaurants: Integrating Trust, Perceived Risk, and Satisfaction
Seo, K. H., & Lee, J. H. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084431 · Cited by 302
Designing Transparency for Effective Human-AI Collaboration
Vössing, M., Kühl, N., Lind, M., & Satzger, G. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10284-3 · Cited by 304
User trust in artificial intelligence: A comprehensive conceptual framework
Yang, R., & Wibowo, S. (2022) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00592-6 · Cited by 170
Make chatbots more adaptive: Dual pathways linking human-like cues and tailored response to trust in interactions with chatbots
Jiang, Y., Yang, X., & Zheng, T. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107485 · Cited by 189
The moderating role of gender and age in the adoption of mobile wallet
Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2020) · foresight · doi:10.1108/fs-11-2019-0094 · Cited by 180
A systematic analysis of failures in protecting personal health data: A scoping review
Pool, J., Akhlaghpour, S., Fatehi, F., & Burton‐Jones, A. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102719 · Cited by 181
Why do users trust algorithms? A review and conceptualization of initial trust and trust over time
Cabiddu, F., Moi, L., Patriotta, G., & Allen, D. G. (2022) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2022.06.001 · Cited by 138
Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators
Bodó, B. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820939922 · Cited by 137
A UTAUT-Based Framework for Analyzing Users’ Intention to Adopt Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Recruitment: A Case Study of Thailand
Tanantong, T., & Wongras, P. (2024) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems12010028 · Cited by 114
Social Commerce in Emerging Markets and its Impact on Online Community Engagement
Algharabat, R., & Rana, N. P. (2020) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-020-10041-4 · Cited by 125
Online health communities: how do community members build the trust required to adopt information and form close relationships?
Fan, H., & Lederman, R. (2017) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2017.1390187 · Cited by 114
Exploring the moderators and causal process of trust transfer in online-to-offline commerce
Xiao, L., Zhang, Y. E., & Fu, B. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.069 · Cited by 109
Role of trust in customer attitude and behaviour formation towards social service robots
Corte, V. D., Sepe, F., Gürsoy, D., & Prisco, A. (2023) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103587 · Cited by 115
Understanding users' trust transfer mechanism in a blockchain-enabled platform: A mixed methods study
Shao, Z., Zhang, L., Brown, S. A., & Zhao, T. (2022) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2021.113716 · Cited by 107
What influences patients' continuance intention to use AI-powered service robots at hospitals? The role of individual characteristics
Liu, X., He, X., Wang, M., & Shen, H. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101996 · Cited by 91
Shifting attitudes and trust in AI: Influences on organizational AI adoption
Daly, S. J., Wiewiora, A. M., & Hearn, G. (2025) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124108 · Cited by 118
The Nature of Crowd Work and its Effects on Individuals’ Work Perception
Durward, D., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2019.1705506 · Cited by 98
Self-citation
Trust in a ‘trust-free’ system: Blockchain acceptance in the banking and finance sector
Gan, Q., & Lau, R. Y. K. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123050 · Cited by 96
Toward a design theory for virtual companionship
Strohmann, T., Siemon, D., Khosrawi-Rad, B., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2022) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2022.2084620 · Cited by 95
Facets of trust in simulation studies
Harper, A. L., Mustafee, N., & Yearworth, M. (2020) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.06.043 · Cited by 80
Give your hunger a new option: Understanding consumers' continuous intention to use online food delivery apps using trust transfer theory
Raza, A., Asif, M., & Akram, M. (2022) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12845 · Cited by 86
Re-Examining the Impact of Multidimensional Trust on Patients’ Online Medical Consultation Service Continuance Decision
Yang, M. H., Jiang, J., Kiang, M. Y., & Yuan, F. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10117-9 · Cited by 72
Trusting the trust machine: Evaluating trust signals of blockchain applications
Völter, F., Urbach, N., & Padget, J. A. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102429 · Cited by 66
Digitalization as solution to environmental problems? When users rely on augmented reality-recommendation agents
Joerß, T., Hoffmann, S., Mai, R., & Akbar, P. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.019 · Cited by 68
Process is king: Evaluating the performance of technology-mediated learning in vocational software training
Söllner, M., Bitzer, P., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. (2018) · Journal of Information and Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-017-0046-6 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Investigating the factors influencing users’ adoption of artificial intelligence health assistants based on an extended UTAUT model
Su, J., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., & Li, Z. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01897-0 · Cited by 68
Examining Consumers’ Behavioral Intention in O2O Commerce from a Relational Perspective: an Exploratory Study
Xiao, L., Mi, C., Zhang, Y. E., & Ma, J. (2017) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9815-6 · Cited by 52
User Roles in Online Communities and Their Moderating Effect on Online Community Usage Intention: An Integrated Approach
Akar, E., Mardikyan, S., & Dalgić, T. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1465325 · Cited by 48
Making sense of the conceptual nonsense ‘trustworthy AI’
Freiman, O. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-022-00241-w · Cited by 64
A qualitative study of students’ lived experience and perceptions of using ChatGPT: immediacy, equity and integrity
Holland, A., & Ciachir, C. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2350655 · Cited by 59
Fear of the new technology: Investigating the factors that influence individual attitudes toward generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Wang, G., Obrenovic, B., Gu, X., & Godinić, D. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07357-2 · Cited by 52
A decision paradox: benefit vs risk and trust vs distrust for online dating adoption vs non-adoption
Chen, Q., Yuan, Y., Feng, Y., & Archer, N. (2020) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-07-2019-0304 · Cited by 49
Designing for Trust in Blockchain Platforms
Zavolokina, L., Zani, N., & Schwabe, G. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.3015359 · Cited by 44
A qualitative systematic review of trust in technology
Schuetz, S. W., Kuai, L., Lacity, M. C., & Steelman, Z. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962241254392 · Cited by 47
Is this AI sexist? The effects of a biased AI’s anthropomorphic appearance and explainability on users’ bias perceptions and trust
Hou, T.-Y., Tseng, Y.-C., & Yuan, C. W. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102775 · Cited by 43
Factors influencing accounting information system usage by oil companies & performance outcomes
Magboul, I. H. M., Jebreel, M., Shawtri, F., Qabajeh, M., Shanti, A. M. A., AlQudah, M. Z., & Huson, Y. A. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2369211 · Cited by 38
Blockchain as a Platform
Glaser, F., Hawlitschek, F., & Notheisen, B. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98911-2_4 · Cited by 44
Speciesism and Preference of Human–Artificial Intelligence Interaction: A Study on Medical Artificial Intelligence
Huo, W., Zhang, Z., Qu, J., Yan, J., Yan, S., Yan, J., & Shi, B. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2176985 · Cited by 41
IT’s a matter of trust: Literature reviews and analyses of human trust in information technology
Lacity, M. C., Schuetz, S. W., Kuai, L., & Steelman, Z. R. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962231226397 · Cited by 52
Understanding Engagement in Online Health Communities: A Trust-Based Perspective
Connolly, R., Sanchez, O. P., EAESP, F. G. V. –. F., Compeau, D., Tacco, F. M. D. S., & EAESP, F. G. V. –. F. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00785 · Cited by 39
Hybrid intelligence in hospitals: towards a research agenda for collaboration
Mirbabaie, M., Stieglitz, S., & Frick, N. (2021) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-021-00457-4 · Cited by 37
The trustification of AI. Disclosing the bridging pillars that tie trust and AI together
Bareis, J. (2024) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517241249430 · Cited by 32
Cashless preferences during the COVID-19 pandemic: investigating user intentions to continue UPI-based payment systems in India
Kirmani, M. D., Haque, M. A., Sadiq, M. A., & Hasan, F. (2022) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-08-2021-0127 · Cited by 41
Blockchain and trust in supply chains: a bibliometric analysis and trust transfer perspective
Yavaprabhas, K., Pournader, M., & Seuring, S. A. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2024.2389544 · Cited by 30
A Trust Label System for Communicating Trust in Cloud Services
Emeakaroha, V. C., Fatema, K., van der Werff, L., Healy, P. D., Lynn, T., & Morrison, J. P. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2016.2553036 · Cited by 27
The Agony of Choice Analyzing User Preferences Regarding Gamification Elements in Learning Management SystemsPreprint
Schöbel, S., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3159163 · Cited by 30
Self-citation
Building loyalty in e-commerce
Xiao, L., Guo, Z., D’Ambra, J. D., & Fu, B. (2016) · Data Technologies and Applications · doi:10.1108/prog-04-2016-0040 · Cited by 27
Trust through words: The systemize-empathize-effect of language in task-oriented conversational agents
Brunswicker, S., Zhang, Y., Rashidian, C., & Linna, D. W. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108516 · Cited by 32
Perceived artificial intelligence literacy and employability of university students
Wut, T. M., Chan, E. A.-H., Wong, H. S.-M., & Chan, J. K. Y. (2025) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-06-2024-0272 · Cited by 40
The Influence of AI-Based Chatbots and Their Design on Users’ Trust and Information Sharing in Online Loan Applications
Zierau, N., Flock, K., Janson, A., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.666 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Global mapping of artificial intelligence in Google and Google Scholar
Omar, M., Mehmood, A., Choi, G. S., & Park, H. W. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2534-4 · Cited by 23
Data ethics : building trust : how digital technologies can serve humanity
(2023) · doi:10.58863/20.500.12424/4273108 · Cited by 25
Social-Oriented Communication with AI Companions: Benefits, Costs, and Contextual Patterns
Bayor, L., Weinert, C., Maier, C., & Weitzel, T. (2025) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-025-00955-1 · Cited by 24
Factors Influencing Adoption of Large Language Models in Health Care: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Observational Study
Yang, X., Xiao, Y., Liu, D., Deng, H., Huang, J., Zhou, Y., Liang, M., Dong, L., Yuan, Z., Yao, J., et al. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/84918 · Cited by 26
Trust in “Trust-free” Digital Networks: How Inter-firm Algorithmic Relationships Embed the Cardinal Principles of Value Co-creation
Das, A. K. (2020) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00137 · Cited by 23
Data Privacy and Trust in Cloud Computing
Lynn, T., Mooney, J. G., van der Werff, L., & Fox, G. (2020) · Palgrave studies in digital business & enabling technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54660-1 · Cited by 34
Antecedent, behaviour, and consequence (a-b-c) of deploying the contact tracing app in response to COVID-19: Evidence from Europe
Dzandu, M. D. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122217 · Cited by 21
Shaping crowdlending investors’ trust: Technological, social, and economic exchange perspectives
Perdana, A., Jutasompakorn, P., & Chung, S. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00650-7 · Cited by 24
The Successful Adoption of IS in the Tourism Public Sector: The Mediating Effect of Employees’ Trust
Ghanem, M., Elshaer, I. A., & Shaker, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12093877 · Cited by 21
Trust in Public and Private Providers of Health Apps and Usage Intentions
Binzer, B., Kendziorra, J., Witte, A.-K., & Winkler, T. J. (2024) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-024-00869-4 · Cited by 24
Factors influencing behavioral intention to use facial recognition payment in the restaurant industry: a comparative analysis of China and Malaysia
Yu, T., Teoh, A. P., Liao, J., & Wang, C. (2025) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2025.2455421 · Cited by 19
Calculating trust in domain analysis: Theoretical trust model
Qundus, J. A., Paschke, A., Kumar, S., & Gupta, S. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.012 · Cited by 22
Digitally-enabled antecedents of trust, repurchase intention and the impact of blockchain traceability labels
Zhang, L., Shao, Z., Zhao, T., Li, X., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101469 · Cited by 21
Blockchain and Trust in the Platform Economy: The Case of Peer-to-Peer Sharing
Dann, D., Peukert, C., Martin, C., Weinhardt, C., Hawlitschek, F., & U Berlin, T. I. D. S. (2020) · Wirtschaftsinformatik · doi:10.30844/wi_2020_n2-dann · Cited by 20
AI Product Factors and Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Integrated Model with Hybrid Analytical Approaches
Liao, C.-H. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13030144 · Cited by 18
Human-robot trust dynamics: understanding tourist confidence in service robots in tourism & hospitality
Choubey, V. M., Chakraborty, D., & Joshi, Y. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1080/10941665.2025.2486015 · Cited by 18
Smart Glasses in Health Care: A Patient Trust Perspective
Klinker, K., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.435 · Cited by 17
(Re)Conceptualizing trustworthy AI: A foundation for change
Wirz, C. D., Demuth, J. L., Bostrom, A., Cains, M. G., Ebert‐Uphoff, I., Gagne, D. J., Schumacher, A., McGovern, A., & Madlambayan, D. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2025.104309 · Cited by 23
(Why) Do We Trust AI?: A Case of AI-based Health Chatbots
Prakash, A. V., & Das, S. (2024) · AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v28.4235 · Cited by 21
LegalWriter: An Intelligent Writing Support System for Structured and Persuasive Legal Case Writing for Novice Law Students
Weber, F., Wambsganß, T., Neshaei, S. P., & Soellner, M. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642743 · Cited by 27
E-commerce adoption among entrepreneurial firms in Sub-Saharan Africa
Anabila, P., Kumi, D. K., Ameyibor, L. E. K., & Allan, M. M. (2024) · Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1108/jsbed-08-2023-0358 · Cited by 20
Editor’s Comments
Maruping, L. M., Yin, D., Chen, A., Kankanhalli, A., Burton‐Jones, A., & Brown, S. A. (2025) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2025/49.1.00 · Cited by 16
Challenges to Co-Creating Value in Nascent Platform Ecosystems: Gaps Between Theory and Practice
Hawlitschek, F., & Hodapp, D. (2024) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2024.2332046 · Cited by 15
“Hey Genie, You Got Me Thinking about My Menu Choices!” Impact of Proactive Feedback on User Perception and Reflection in Decision-making Tasks
Dubiel, M., Leiva, L. A., Bongard-Blanchy, K., & Sergeeva, A. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3685274 · Cited by 17
Understanding Trust and Cloud Computing: An Integrated Framework for Assurance and Accountability in the Cloud
Lynn, T., van der Werff, L., & Fox, G. (2020) · Palgrave studies in digital business & enabling technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54660-1_1 · Cited by 14
Watch who you trust! A structured literature review to build a typology of e-government risks
Distel, B., Koelmann, H., Plattfaut, R., & Becker, J. (2022) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-022-00573-4 · Cited by 20
Vaccine Hesitancy and the Concept of Trust: An Analysis Based on the Israeli COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign
Freiman, O. (2023) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-023-09498-9 · Cited by 14
Opening the Network of Trust: How Domain Experts in Triadic Relationships Build Trust in AI-Based Counterparts
Hanelt, A., Wiesche, M., Benlian, A., & Hinz, O. F. (2025) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2025/18041 · Cited by 18
User Engagement and Beyond: A Conceptual Framework for Engagement in Information Systems Research
Benz, C., Riefle, L., & Satzger, G. (2024) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.05412 · Cited by 15
Why Should I Trust a Blockchain Platform? Designing for Trust in the Digital Car Dossier
Zavolokina, L., Zani, N., & Schwabe, G. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19504-5_18 · Cited by 11
Trust in e-participation
Santamaría-Philco, A., & Wimmer, M. A. (2018) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3209281.3209286 · Cited by 10
Measuring creolization in IT outsourcing: Instrument development and validation
Ai, S., Du, R., Straub, D. W., Maruping, L. M., & Miao, Y. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.012 · Cited by 10
Achieving software development agility: different roles of team, methodological and process factors
Rathor, S., Xia, W., & Batra, D. (2023) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-10-2021-0832 · Cited by 15
Statistically Significant! But Is Trust of Practical Significance?
Liu, D., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2020) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2020.1783723 · Cited by 10
Examining consumers' continuance and sharing intention toward food delivery apps
Goyal, S., Chauhan, S., Gajpal, Y., & Bhardwaj, A. K. (2023) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-01-2023-0006 · Cited by 10
CUI@CHI 2024: Building Trust in CUIs—From Design to Deployment
Desai, S., Wei, C. Z., Sin, J., Dubiel, M., Zargham, N., Ahire, S., Porcheron, M., Kuzminykh, A., Lee, M., Candello, H. C. D. S. P., et al. (2024) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3613905.3636287 · Cited by 12
Shared benefits and sustainable mobility – A case of autonomous bus
Koskinen, K., Mallat, N., & Upreti, B. R. (2024) · Case Studies on Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101286 · Cited by 12
The adoption and effective use of artificial intelligence in Moroccan higher education: the moderating role of trust
Razzouki, M., Hammou, S. B., & Izenzal, M. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2553829 · Cited by 13
Trust Transfer in Sharing Accommodation: The Moderating Role of Privacy Concerns
Lu, B., & Wang, Z. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14127384 · Cited by 9
Smart Streets as a Cyber-Physical Social Platform: A Conceptual Framework
Lynn, T., & Wood, C. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23031399 · Cited by 9
Minnesota landowners’ trust in their department of natural resources, salient values similarity and wildlife value orientations
Gigliotti, L. M., Sweikert, L. A., Cornicelli, L. J., & Fulton, D. C. (2020) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-020-09766-z · Cited by 13
Revising the Socio-Technical Perspective for the 21st Century
Fischer, L. H., & Baskerville, R. (2020) · Journal of Database Management · doi:10.4018/jdm.2020100104 · Cited by 9
Trust in Smart Personal Assistants: A Systematic Literature Review and Development of a Research AgendaPreprint
Zierau, N., Engel, C., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3920577 · Cited by 9
Self-citation

Authors: Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., & Leimeister, J. M.
Affiliations: University of Kassel (DE)
Corresponding author: Söllner, Matthias
ORCID: Söllner, Matthias
Leimeister, Jan Marco
Venue: European Journal of Information Systems
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2016-05
Volume: 25
Issue: 3
Pages: 274-287
ISSN: 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
1476-9344
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2015.17
OpenAlex: W2257140431
Cited by: 223
References: 89
Citations by year: 2026: 44 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI: 9.17
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations: European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (cc-by)
Topics: Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords: trust relationships, information system users, technology acceptance, trust in information systems, user trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks