Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise: A mid-range theory
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among management researchers, it has become conventional to report the results of counterfactual analyses by distinguishing core from contributing conditions.
“Among management researchers, it has become conventional to report the results of these counterfactual analyses by distinguishing those attributes among the reported solution that are 'core' from those that are 'contributing' conditions (e.g., Crilly, 2011; Fiss, 2011; Misangyi & Acharya, 2014)”
From Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Crilly, 2011
Recent studies have shown that an iterative process between the findings and returning to empirical cases can prove to be fruitful in large-N settings even without the intimate case knowledge typical of the small-N QCA approach.
“recent studies have shown that an iterative process between the findings and returning to empirical cases can prove to be fruitful in large-N settings (Crilly, 2011; Campbell, Sirmon, & Schijven, 2015; Misangyi & Acharya, 2014) even without the intimate case knowledge typical of the small-N QCA approach.”
From Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Crilly, 2011
Cites
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Proponents of the property conception of the firm emphasize managers’ fiduciary duties to shareholders (Fama & Jensen, 1983; Friedman, 1970).”
BackgroundWHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques
Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2009) · SAGE Publications · doi:10.4135/9781452226569 · Cited by 3,089 · see citing works
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Fiss, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092 · Cited by 2,225 · see citing works
Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage
Ragin, C. C. (2006) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpj019 · Cited by 1,784 · see citing works
Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: a fuzzy-set analysis
Pajunen, K. (2008) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400371 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930 · see citing works
Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316679252 · Cited by 1,099 · see citing works
Self-citationChapter 3 The Two QCAs: From a Small-N to a Large-N Set Theoretic Approach
Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., & Fiss, P. C. (2013) · Research in the Sociology of Organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0000038007 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Park, Y., Fiss, P. C., & El Sawy, O. A. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/13879 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
George Washington University, U., Park, Y., El Sawy, O. A., University of Southern California, U., Fiss, P. C., & University of Southern California, U. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00467 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
- Authors
- Crilly, D.
- Affiliations
- London Business School (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Crilly, Donal
- ORCID
- Crilly, Donal
- Venue
- Journal of International Business Studies
- Published
- 2010-12-23
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 694-717
- ISSN
- 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-6990
- OpenAlex
- W2013362389
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 23.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Keywords
- stakeholder orientation, multinational corporations, foreign subsidiaries, shareholder wealth maximization, stakeholder theory, parent-subsidiary relationships, internal control, institutional isomorphism, social engagement, middle-range theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review