The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovation and Scaling of ICT for the Bottom-Of-The-Pyramid
Abstract
Scaling represents successful diffusion that ensures sizeable impact and earnings from information and communication technology (ICT) innovations in emerging markets. Practice can still be shaped by dualistic views - innovation vs diffusion, pilot vs scale-up, lead firm vs other actors, technical vs social. Synthesising the literature that challenges these dualities, this paper creates a systemic perspective that is particularly appropriate for scaling of ICT to bottom-of-the-pyramid (BoP) markets. That perspective is then instantiated through the case study of a successfully-scaled ICT innovation that has reached millions of poor consumers: the Kenyan m-money system, M-Pesa. It finds that scaling of this ICT system can be understood as a four-stage process of exploratory, incremental then aggressive growth, followed by (attempted) standardisation. Throughout these stages of scaling, ongoing adaptive innovations have been fundamental and have been both necessitated and shaped by the BoP context. These innovations have been more socio-technical than technical, and have emerged from a growing variety of actors and locations closer to poor consumers than the lead firm. The lead firm has buffered the unfamiliarity of BoP markets by approaching them through the ‘middle-of-the-pyramid’ and by intensive learning. At times, its planned ‘shifts’ in scaling strategy have triggered adaptive innovations. At other times, emergent innovations and learning lead to incremental ‘drifts’ in lead firm strategy. ICT firms wishing to scale goods and services for BoP markets must therefore recognise the multi-locational, continuous, and emergent nature of innovation, and develop processes to monitor and address those innovations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The 'aggregator model' inaugurated in 2010 reduced the number of dealers from hundreds to about 10, each of which was responsible for 2,000 or more agents.”
From Cannibalizing the Informal Economy: Frugal Innovation and Economic Inclusion in Africa (2018) · cites this paper as Foster and Heeks 2013
In the citing paper
“It was users themselves who began using the system as a form of mobile money, and subsequently innovated additional services such as micro-savings (Foster and Heeks 2013:301;Osango 2013;van der Boor et al. 2014van der Boor et al. :1600)).”
From Cannibalizing the Informal Economy: Frugal Innovation and Economic Inclusion in Africa (2018) · cites this paper as Foster and Heeks 2013
In the citing paper
“Piloted in 2006, M-Pesa had over 2 million subscribers in its first year of operation, and now boasts just under 20 million M-Pesa accounts (Foster and Heeks 2013;Onsongo 2013;Paunov 2013: 50;Safaricom 2016).”
From Cannibalizing the Informal Economy: Frugal Innovation and Economic Inclusion in Africa (2018) · cites this paper as Foster and Heeks 2013
In the citing paper
“However, the first pilot focused on mobile payment solutions for the micro-finance industry, was a failure.”
From Cannibalizing the Informal Economy: Frugal Innovation and Economic Inclusion in Africa (2018) · cites this paper as Foster and Heeks 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations
Heeks, R. (2002) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240290075039 · Cited by 1,390 · cited 2×
“One characteristic of this particular context is the significant ‘distance’ in many senses between the designers of new ICT systems and those in poor communities in developing countries, leading to a poor fit between initial designs and contexts of use (Heeks, 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSarker, S., Sarker, S., Sahaym, A., & Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410419 · Cited by 367
Research works printed but not linked: 85
- AFI, 2010, Enabling Mobile Money Transfer: The Central Bank of Kenya's treatment of M-Pesa
- 10.1108/17468800810906057 · DOI
- 10.1108/14636691011015358 · DOI
- 10.1108/14636690810850120 · DOI
- Antonelli C., 2007, The Foundations of the Economics of Innovation.
- 10.1177/1350508411414294 · DOI · Paper page
- Bhatnagar S.C., 2010, Information Technologies and International Development, 6, 109
- 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TWC.2006.1638664 · DOI
- 10.2307/25148643 · DOI · Paper page
- Camner G., 2009, Can the Success of M-Pesa Be Repeated: A review of the implementations in Kenya and Tanzania
- CBK, 2010, Guideline on Agent Banking.
- CCK, 2012, Quarterly Sector Statistics Report (April-June 2012)
- Ciborra C., 1999, Rethinking Management Information Systems, 136, 10.1093/oso/9780198775331.003.0007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Davidson N., 2010, Building, Incentivising and Managing a Network of Mobile Money Agents: A handbook for mobile network operators
- DFID, 2006, Progress of Funded Projects: November 2006
- 10.1080/01436590903134882 · DOI
- Edquist C., 1997, Systems of Innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations, 1
- Eijkman F., 2009, Bridging the Cash: The retail end of M-PESA - The challenge of maintaining liquidity for M-PESA agent networks
- 10.1080/02796015.2003.12086200 · DOI · Paper page
- FDCF, 2006, Fund Managers Report on Progress of Funded Projects: Mobile microfinance
- Flaming M., 2011, Agent Management Toolkit
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-2862-3_30 · DOI
- 10.1080/2157930X.2013.764628 · DOI
- 10.1057/ejdr.2013.7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09614520120066792 · DOI
- Freeman C., 1995, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5
- FSD Kenya, 2009, FinAccess National Survey 2009: Dynamics of Kenya's changing financial landscape
- Futterman N.F., 2010, ICTD2010
- Haas S., 2010, Outreach of M-PESA System in Kenya: Emerging trends
- Hartmann A., 2008, Scaling Up: A framework and lessons for development effectiveness from literature and practice.
- 10.1109/MC.2008.192 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/52.765784 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/itgg.2007.2.1-2.63 · DOI · Paper page
- IIRR, 2000, Going to Scale: Can we bring more benefits to more people more quickly?
- Jack W., 2009, The Economics of M-Pesa
- Jack W., 2010, The Economics of M-Pesa: An update
- 10.1002/itdj.20044 · DOI
- KNBS, 2012, Kenyan Consumer Price Index
- Kolk A., 2010, Academy of Management Annual Conference
- 10.1080/01972240701883948 · DOI
- Kwama K., 2006, The Standard
- Leishman P., 2010, Is There Any Money in Mobile Money?
- Leishman P., 2010, True Money and M-PESA: Two unique paths to scale
- London T., 2009, Business Model R&D for New Market Entry.
- 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400099 · DOI · Paper page
- Lonie S., 2010, Innovations in Rural and Agricultural Finance: M-PESA: Finding new ways to serve the unbanked in Kenya.
- 10.4337/9781847201737 · DOI
- 10.4337/9781849803427 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4337/9781849803427.00006 · DOI
- Magnette N., 2005, Scaling Microfinance with the Remote Transaction System
- 10.1108/17468800710718895 · DOI
- 10.1162/itgg.2009.4.2.77 · DOI
- Mas I., 2010, Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 4, 352, 10.69554/XTRP3508 · DOI
- Mas I., 2010, Scaling Mobile Money
- 10.1080/019722498128845 · DOI
- Morawczynski O., 2010, Examining the Adoption, Usage and Outcomes of Mobile Money Services: The case of M-PESA in Kenya.
- Morawczynski O., 2009, Poor People Using Mobile Financial Services: Observations on customer usage and impact from M-Pesa, Brief
- 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00876.x · DOI
- Omwansa T., 2009, Innovations (Special Edition for GSMA Mobile World Congress 2009), 107
- 10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700 · DOI · Paper page
- Pickens M., 2009, Agent Economics: M-PESA
- 10.1108/07363760810915608 · DOI
- Prahalad C.K., 2009, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits.
- 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00874.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444807082639 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.007 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199901)20:1<49::AID-SMJ20>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
- Rogers E.M., 1962, Diffusion of Innovations
- Rogers E.M., 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
- Safaricom (2012b). Press Release: Safaricom targets low income users in first ever M-Pesa tariff reduction [www document] http://www.safaricom.co.ke/index.php?id=1591 (accessed 5 April 2012).
- 10.1002/itdj.20041 · DOI
- Schumpeter J.A., 1939, Business Cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process
- 10.1017/S0022050700054279 · DOI · Paper page
- Simanis E., 2009, MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 78
- Simon J.P., 2011, The ICT Landscape in BRICS Countries
- Smits S., 2007, Learning Alliances: Scaling-up innovations in water, sanitation and hygiene
- Stuart G., 2011, Cash In, Cash Out Kenya: The role of MPESA in the lives of low income people
- 10.1057/jit.2009.20 · DOI
- Tomasic A., 1995, Scaling Heterogeneous Databases and the Design of Disco
- 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00037-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/itdj.20020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3763/ijas.2010.0562 · DOI
- World Bank, 2011, Information & Communication Technologies.
Cited by
Cannibalizing the Informal Economy: Frugal Innovation and Economic Inclusion in Africa
Meagher, K. (2018) · The European Journal of Development Research · doi:10.1057/s41287-017-0113-4 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, C., & Heeks, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Technology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 296-315
- ISSN
- 0268-3962
- 1466-4437
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.