Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 108

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Innovation and Scaling of ICT for the Bottom-Of-The-Pyramid

Foster, Chris, Heeks, Richard·2013·Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

Scaling represents successful diffusion that ensures sizeable impact and earnings from information and communication technology (ICT) innovations in emerging markets. Practice can still be shaped by dualistic views - innovation vs diffusion, pilot vs scale-up, lead firm vs other actors, technical vs social. Synthesising the literature that challenges these dualities, this paper creates a systemic perspective that is particularly appropriate for scaling of ICT to bottom-of-the-pyramid (BoP) markets. That perspective is then instantiated through the case study of a successfully-scaled ICT innovation that has reached millions of poor consumers: the Kenyan m-money system, M-Pesa. It finds that scaling of this ICT system can be understood as a four-stage process of exploratory, incremental then aggressive growth, followed by (attempted) standardisation. Throughout these stages of scaling, ongoing adaptive innovations have been fundamental and have been both necessitated and shaped by the BoP context. These innovations have been more socio-technical than technical, and have emerged from a growing variety of actors and locations closer to poor consumers than the lead firm. The lead firm has buffered the unfamiliarity of BoP markets by approaching them through the ‘middle-of-the-pyramid’ and by intensive learning. At times, its planned ‘shifts’ in scaling strategy have triggered adaptive innovations. At other times, emergent innovations and learning lead to incremental ‘drifts’ in lead firm strategy. ICT firms wishing to scale goods and services for BoP markets must therefore recognise the multi-locational, continuous, and emergent nature of innovation, and develop processes to monitor and address those innovations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/jit.2013.19

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 85

  1. AFI, 2010, Enabling Mobile Money Transfer: The Central Bank of Kenya's treatment of M-Pesa
  2. 10.1108/17468800810906057 · DOI
  3. 10.1108/14636691011015358 · DOI
  4. 10.1108/14636690810850120 · DOI
  5. Antonelli C., 2007, The Foundations of the Economics of Innovation.
  6. 10.1177/1350508411414294 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bhatnagar S.C., 2010, Information Technologies and International Development, 6, 109
  8. 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_2 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1109/TWC.2006.1638664 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/25148643 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Camner G., 2009, Can the Success of M-Pesa Be Repeated: A review of the implementations in Kenya and Tanzania
  12. CBK, 2010, Guideline on Agent Banking.
  13. CCK, 2012, Quarterly Sector Statistics Report (April-June 2012)
  14. Ciborra C., 1999, Rethinking Management Information Systems, 136, 10.1093/oso/9780198775331.003.0007 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Davidson N., 2010, Building, Incentivising and Managing a Network of Mobile Money Agents: A handbook for mobile network operators
  17. DFID, 2006, Progress of Funded Projects: November 2006
  18. 10.1080/01436590903134882 · DOI
  19. Edquist C., 1997, Systems of Innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations, 1
  20. Eijkman F., 2009, Bridging the Cash: The retail end of M-PESA - The challenge of maintaining liquidity for M-PESA agent networks
  21. 10.1080/02796015.2003.12086200 · DOI · Paper page
  22. FDCF, 2006, Fund Managers Report on Progress of Funded Projects: Mobile microfinance
  23. Flaming M., 2011, Agent Management Toolkit
  24. 10.1007/978-1-4615-2862-3_30 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/2157930X.2013.764628 · DOI
  26. 10.1057/ejdr.2013.7 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1080/09614520120066792 · DOI
  28. Freeman C., 1995, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5
  29. FSD Kenya, 2009, FinAccess National Survey 2009: Dynamics of Kenya's changing financial landscape
  30. Futterman N.F., 2010, ICTD2010
  31. Haas S., 2010, Outreach of M-PESA System in Kenya: Emerging trends
  32. Hartmann A., 2008, Scaling Up: A framework and lessons for development effectiveness from literature and practice.
  33. 10.1109/MC.2008.192 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1109/52.765784 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1162/itgg.2007.2.1-2.63 · DOI · Paper page
  36. IIRR, 2000, Going to Scale: Can we bring more benefits to more people more quickly?
  37. Jack W., 2009, The Economics of M-Pesa
  38. Jack W., 2010, The Economics of M-Pesa: An update
  39. 10.1002/itdj.20044 · DOI
  40. KNBS, 2012, Kenyan Consumer Price Index
  41. Kolk A., 2010, Academy of Management Annual Conference
  42. 10.1080/01972240701883948 · DOI
  43. Kwama K., 2006, The Standard
  44. Leishman P., 2010, Is There Any Money in Mobile Money?
  45. Leishman P., 2010, True Money and M-PESA: Two unique paths to scale
  46. London T., 2009, Business Model R&D for New Market Entry.
  47. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400099 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Lonie S., 2010, Innovations in Rural and Agricultural Finance: M-PESA: Finding new ways to serve the unbanked in Kenya.
  49. 10.4337/9781847201737 · DOI
  50. 10.4337/9781849803427 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.4337/9781849803427.00006 · DOI
  52. Magnette N., 2005, Scaling Microfinance with the Remote Transaction System
  53. 10.1108/17468800710718895 · DOI
  54. 10.1162/itgg.2009.4.2.77 · DOI
  55. Mas I., 2010, Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems, 4, 352, 10.69554/XTRP3508 · DOI
  56. Mas I., 2010, Scaling Mobile Money
  57. 10.1080/019722498128845 · DOI
  58. Morawczynski O., 2010, Examining the Adoption, Usage and Outcomes of Mobile Money Services: The case of M-PESA in Kenya.
  59. Morawczynski O., 2009, Poor People Using Mobile Financial Services: Observations on customer usage and impact from M-Pesa, Brief
  60. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00876.x · DOI
  61. Omwansa T., 2009, Innovations (Special Edition for GSMA Mobile World Congress 2009), 107
  62. 10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Pickens M., 2009, Agent Economics: M-PESA
  64. 10.1108/07363760810915608 · DOI
  65. Prahalad C.K., 2009, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits.
  66. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00874.x · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1177/1461444807082639 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.007 · DOI
  69. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199901)20:1<49::AID-SMJ20>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  70. Rogers E.M., 1962, Diffusion of Innovations
  71. Rogers E.M., 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
  72. Safaricom (2012b). Press Release: Safaricom targets low income users in first ever M-Pesa tariff reduction [www document] http://www.safaricom.co.ke/index.php?id=1591 (accessed 5 April 2012).
  73. 10.1002/itdj.20041 · DOI
  74. Schumpeter J.A., 1939, Business Cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process
  75. 10.1017/S0022050700054279 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Simanis E., 2009, MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 78
  77. Simon J.P., 2011, The ICT Landscape in BRICS Countries
  78. Smits S., 2007, Learning Alliances: Scaling-up innovations in water, sanitation and hygiene
  79. Stuart G., 2011, Cash In, Cash Out Kenya: The role of MPESA in the lives of low income people
  80. 10.1057/jit.2009.20 · DOI
  81. Tomasic A., 1995, Scaling Heterogeneous Databases and the Design of Disco
  82. 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00037-1 · DOI
  83. 10.1002/itdj.20020 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.3763/ijas.2010.0562 · DOI
  85. World Bank, 2011, Information & Communication Technologies.

Cited by

See all 108

Metadata

Authors
Foster, C., & Heeks, R.
Venue
Journal of Information Technology
Published
2013-12
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
296-315
ISSN
  • 0268-3962
  • 1466-4437
Cited by
108
References
2
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.