Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Running Uphill: An Experimental Result and its Applications

Davey, R. C., Hayes, M., Norman, J. M.·1994·Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

An experimentally derived formula has implications for (i) the measurement of a runner's workrate; (ii) choice of gradient in running uphill; and (iii) the use of Naismith's rule in deriving schedules for fell runners.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/jors.1994.3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Established methods for predicting walking time use the gradient in the direction of travel (walking slope) as the main variable.

    “Hikers and hillwalkers typically use the gradient in the direction of travel (walking slope) as the main variable in established methods for predicting walking time (via the walking speed) along a route.”
  • Previous work identified the existence of a critical gradient, the angle at which it is faster to zig-zag up a hill rather than ascend directly, occurring at a walking slope of around 15-21 degrees.

    “Furthermore, previous work [11, 29–31] has identified the existence of a critical gradient; the angle at which it is faster to zig-zag up a hill, rather than ascend directly. This occurs at a walking slope of around 15—21 degrees, so models which failed to predict the critical gradient occurring below 21 degrees were removed.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Davey, R. C., Hayes, M., & Norman, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Medical Physics and Clinical EngineeringUniversity of Sheffield
  • Sheffield University Management School
Venue
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Published
1994-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
25-29
ISSN
  • 0160-5682
  • 1476-9360
Cited by
18
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review