Cited by 26Evacuation and Crowd DynamicsHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisTransportation Planning and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting the variability in pedestrian travel rates and times using crowdsourced GPS data

Open access
Campbell, Michael J., Dennison, Philip E., Thompson, Matthew P.·2022·Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Abstract

Accurately predicting pedestrian travel times is critically valuable in emergency response, wildland firefighting, disaster management, law enforcement, and urban planning. However, the relationship between pedestrian movement and landscape conditions is highly variable between individuals, making it difficult to estimate how long it will take broad populations to get from one location to another on foot. Although functions exist for predicting travel rates, they typically oversimplify the inherent variability of pedestrian travel by assuming the effects of landscapes on movement are universal. In this study, we present an approach for predicting the variability in pedestrian travel rates and times using a large, crowdsourced database of GPS tracks. Acquired from the outdoor recreation website AllTrails, these tracks represent nearly 2000 hikes on a diverse range of trails in Utah and California, USA. We model travel rates as a function of the slope of the terrain by generating a series of non-linear percentile models from the 2.5 th to the 97.5 th by 2.5 percentiles. The 50 th percentile model, representing the hiking speed of the typical individual, demonstrates marked improvement over existing slope-travel rate functions when compared to an independent test dataset. Our results demonstrate novel capacity to estimate travel time variability, with modeled percentiles being able to predict actual percentiles with less than 10% error. Travel rate functions can also be applied…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101866

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing travel rate functions fail to sufficiently account for the vast diversity of landscape conditions that impede foot travel.

    “Although a number of existing travel rate functions exist, they fail to sufficiently account for the vast diversity of landscape conditions that impede foot travel3–11.”
  • The conditions of slope dominance and minimal vegetation-density and surface-roughness variability are met for on-path travel, where surface roughness is assumed uniform and vegetation density is negligible.

    “and for “on-path” travel, where surface roughness is assumed to be uniform and vegetation density is negligible3,5,10.”
  • A STRIDE model using no vegetation cover and median trail surface roughness was nearly identical to the 67.5th percentile travel rate function from a large, diverse, crowdsourced dataset representing on-path travel, with RMSE = 0.018 ms−2, bias = +0.005 ms−2, and R2 = 0.996.

    “A STRIDE model using no vegetation cover and median trail surface roughness was nearly identical to the 67.5th percentile travel rate function from a study of a large, diverse, crowdsourced dataset representing on-path travel5 (RMSE = 0.018 ms−2; bias = + 0.005 ms−2; R2 = 0.996).”
  • The function form of Eq. (1) is a suitable basis for modeling travel rates.

    “Based on our previous work5,8,39 and preliminary testing, we identified the function form of Eq. (1) as a suitable basis for modeling.”
  • Recent work [8,16] explored data-driven walking speed modelling, but crowdsourced data collection was not controlled, so the data could not be assumed to consist wholly of walking or hiking tracks.

    “This has been explored in recent work [8, 16], however the crowdsourced nature of these studies meant that data collection was not controlled, and thus that the data could not be assumed to consist wholly of walking or hiking tracks.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beighley, 1995, Beyond the safety zone: Creating a margin of safety, Fire Management Notes, 55, 21
  2. Naismith, 1892, Cruach Adran, Stobinian, and Ben More, Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal, 2, 136

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Campbell, M. J., Dennison, P. E., & Thompson, M. P.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Campbell, Michael J.
Venue
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
97
Pages
101866
ISSN
0198-9715 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292397337
Cited by
26
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Computers Environment and Urban Systems (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • USDA Forest Service (21-CS-11221636-120)
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-2117433, -2117433)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
walking time, terrain slope, least-cost path analysis, outdoor recreation, emergency response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review