CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51Philosophy and Theoretical SciencePhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationEmbodied and Extended Cognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What are neural correlates neural correlates of?

Abend, Gabriel·2017·BioSocieties
DOI 10.1057/s41292-016-0019-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41292-016-0019-y

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 168

  1. Abend, G. (2008a) The meaning of ‘theory’. Sociological Theory 26: 173–199. · DOI
  2. Abend, G. (2008b) Two main problems in the sociology of morality. Theory and Society 37: 87–125. · DOI
  3. Abend, G. (2011) Thick concepts and the moral brain. European Journal of Sociology 52: 143–172. · DOI
  4. Abend, G. (2013) What the science of morality doesn’t say about morality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43: 157–200. · DOI
  5. Ammerman, N.T. (2013) Spiritual but not religious? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52: 258–278. · DOI
  6. Andler, D. (2009) Naturalism and the scientific status of the social sciences. In: Suárez, M. et al (eds.) EPSA. Springer, pp. 1–12. · DOI
  7. Andler, D. (2011) Le naturalisme est-il l’horizon scientifique des sciences sociales? In: T. Martin (eds.) Les sciences humaines sont-elles des sciences? Paris: Vuibert, pp. 15–34.
  8. Andler, D. (2016) La Silhouette de l’humain. Paris: Gallimard.
  9. Anscombe, G.E.M. (1958) Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 33: 1–19. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Aron, A. et al (2005) Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology 94: 327–337. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Asad, T. (1983) anthropological reflections on religion: Reflections on Geertz. Man 18: 237–259. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Aspers, P. and Kohl, S. (2013) Heidegger and socio-ontology. Journal of Classical Sociology 13: 487–508. · DOI
  13. Bartels, A. and Zeki, S. (2000) The neural basis of love. NeuroReport 11: 3829–3834. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Benardete, J.A. (1993) Real definitions: Quine and Aristotle. Philosophical Studies 72: 265–282. · DOI
  15. Bennett, M.R. and Hacker, P.M.S. (2003) Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Malden: Blackwell.
  16. Berscheid, E. (2010) Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology 61: 1–25. · DOI
  17. Beversluis, J. (1974) Socratic definition. American Philosophical Quarterly 11: 331–336.
  18. Bourdieu, P. Chamboredon J.-C. and Passeron J.-C. (1973) Le métier du sociologue. 2nd ed. Paris: Mouton.
  19. Cauquil, A.S. et al (2009) Neural correlates of chromostereopsis. Neuropsychologia 47: 2677–2681. · DOI
  20. Chang, H. (2004) Inventing Temperature. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Chang, H. (2011) The persistence of epistemic objects through scientific change. Erkenntnis 75: 413–429. · DOI
  22. Changeux, J.-P. (2008) Du vrai, du beau, du bien. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  23. Chisholm, R.M. (1977) Theory of Knowledge. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  24. Choudhury, S., Nagel, S. and Slaby. J. (2009) Critical neuroscience: Linking neuroscience and society through critical practice. BioSocieties 4: 61–77. · DOI
  25. Choudhury, S. and Slaby, J. (eds.) (2012) Critical Neuroscience. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  26. Churchland, P.M. (1981) Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90.
  27. Cicourel, A.V. (1964) Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: Free Press.
  28. Clark-Polner, E., and Clark, M.S. (2012) Lessons from behavioral science for the neuroscientific investigation of Love. Clinical Neuropsychiatry 9: 47–58.
  29. Cling, A. (1994) Posing the problem of the criterion. Philosophical Studies 75: 261–292. · DOI
  30. Cohn, S. (2004) Increasing resolution, intensifying ambiguity. Economy and Society 33: 52–76. · DOI
  31. Cohn, S. (2008) Petty cash and the neuroscientific mapping of pleasure. BioSocieties 3: 151–163. · DOI
  32. Collier, D. and Gerring J. (eds.) (2009) Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. New York: Routledge.
  33. Collins R. (2008) The four M’s of religion: Magic, membership, morality and mysticism. Review of Religious Research 50: 5–15.
  34. Conway, B.R. and Rehding A. (2013) Neuroaesthetics and the trouble with beauty. PLoS Biology 11(3): e1001504. · DOI
  35. Crary, A. (2007) Beyond Moral Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  36. Crockett, M.J. (2013) Models of morality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17: 363–366. · DOI
  37. Davidson, D. (2001) Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. · DOI
  38. de Muckadell, C.S. (2014) On essentialism and real definitions of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 82: 495–520. · DOI
  39. de Vries, H. (ed.) (2008) Religion: Beyond a Concept. New York: Fordham University Press.
  40. Decety, J. and Wheatley, T. (eds.) (2015) The Moral Brain. Cambridge: MIT.
  41. Donnay, G. et al (2014) Neural substrates of interactive musical improvisation: An fMRI study of ‘trading fours’ in jazz. PLoS One 9(2): e88665. · DOI
  42. Dreyfus, H. and Dreyfus, S. (1990) What is morality? In: Rasmussen, D. (ed.) Universalism vs. Communitarianism. Cambridge: MIT, pp. 237–264.
  43. Dromi, S. and Illouz, E. (2010) Recovering morality: Pragmatic sociology and literary studies. New Literary History 41(2): 351–369. · DOI
  44. Dumit, J. (2004) Picturing Personhood. Princeton: Princeton University Press. · DOI
  45. Dunbar, R. (2014) What’s So Social about the Social Brain? In: Decety, J. and Christen, Y. (eds.) New Frontiers in Social Neuroscience. Springer, pp. 1–10. · DOI
  46. Durkheim, É. (1982/1895) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press. · DOI
  47. Dworkin, R. (1996) Objectivity and truth: You’d better believe it. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25: 87–139. · DOI
  48. Dupré, J. (1993) The Disorder of Things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  49. Epstein, B. (2015) The Ant Trap. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  50. Feest, U. (2005) Operationism in psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 41: 131–149. · DOI
  51. Feest, U. and Sturm, T. (2011) What (good) is historical epistemology? Erkenntnis 75: 282–302.
  52. FitzGerald, C. and Goldie, P. (2012) Thick concepts and their role in moral psychology. In: Langdon R. and Mackenzie C. (eds.) Emotions, Imagination, and Moral Reasoning. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 219–236.
  53. Fitzgerald, D. and Callard, F. (2015) Social science and neuroscience beyond interdisciplinarity: Experimental entanglements. Theory, Culture & Society 32: 3–32. · DOI
  54. Flynn, J.R. (1976) The realm of the moral. American Philosophical Quarterly 13: 273–286.
  55. Foss, A.H. et al (2007) Neural correlates of the Pythagorean ratio rules. NeuroReport 18: 1521–1525. · DOI
  56. Frankena, W. (1958) MacIntyre on defining morality. Philosophy 33(125): 158–162. · DOI
  57. Friston, K.J. et al (2006). A critique of functional localisers. NeuroImage 30: 1077–1087. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Funk, C.M. and Gazzaniga M.S. (2009) The functional and brain architecture of human morality. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 19: 678–681. · DOI
  59. Gallie, W.B. (1955/1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (New Series) 56: 167–198. · DOI · Paper page
  60. Gallie, W.B. (1956) Art as an essentially contested concept. Philosophical Quarterly 6: 97–114. · DOI
  61. Gellner, E. (1973) Cause and Meaning in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  62. Gerring, J. (1999) What makes a concept good? Polity 31: 357–393. · DOI
  63. Goertz, G. (2005) Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  64. Goody, J. (1961) Religion and ritual: The definitional problem. British Journal of Sociology 12: 142–164. · DOI
  65. Gordon, R.M. (1964) Socratic definitions and ‘moral neutrality’. Journal of Philosophy 61: 433–450. · DOI
  66. Gorski, P. (2013) Beyond the fact/value distinction. Society 50: 543–553. · DOI
  67. Greene, J. et al (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293: 2105–2108. · DOI · Paper page
  68. Greene, J. et al (2004) The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 44: 389–400. · DOI · Paper page
  69. Hacking, I. (2002) Historical Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  70. Hagoort, P. and Indefrey, P. (2014) The neurobiology of language beyond single words. Annual Review of Neuroscience 37: 347–362. · DOI
  71. Hanson, S.J. and Bunzl, M. (eds.) (2010) Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping. Cambridge: MIT.
  72. Hare, R.M. (1952) The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  73. Hare, R.M. (1963) Freedom and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  74. Harris, S. et al (2009) The neural correlates of religious and nonreligious belief. PLoS One 4(10): e7272. · DOI
  75. Hartley, F. (1873) The Ladies’ Book of Etiquette and Manual of Politeness. Boston: Lee and Shepard. · DOI
  76. Hartley, C. (1875) The Gentlemen’s Book of Etiquette and Manual of Politeness. Boston: J.S. Locke.
  77. Heining, M. et al (2003) Disgusting smells activate human anterior insula and ventral striatum. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1000: 380–384. · DOI
  78. Hickok, G. and Poeppel, D. (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8: 393–402. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Hill, P. et al (2000) Conceptualizing Religion and Spirituality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30: 51–77. · DOI · Paper page
  80. Horton, R. (1960) A Definition of religion, and its uses. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 90: 201–226. · DOI
  81. Huynh, H.K. et al (2013) Female orgasm but not male ejaculation activates the pituitary. NeuroImage 76: 178–182. · DOI
  82. Indefrey, P. and Levelt, W.J.M. (2000) The neural correlates of language production. In: Gazzaniga M. (eds.) The New Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge: MIT, pp. 845–865.
  83. Indefrey, P. and Levelt, W.J.M. (2004) The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92: 101–44. · DOI · Paper page
  84. Joyce, K. (2008) Magnetic Appeal. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  85. Kekes, J. (1977) Morality and impartiality. American Philosophical Quarterly 18: 295–303.
  86. Kircher, T.T.J. et al (2005) Neural correlates of syntax production in schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry 186: 209–214. · DOI
  87. Klein, C. (2010) Images are not the evidence in neuroimaging. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61: 265–278. · DOI
  88. Klein, C. (2012) Cognitive ontology and region-versus network-oriented analyses. Philosophy of Science 79: 952–960. · DOI
  89. Klein, C. (2014) The brain at rest. Philosophy of Science 81: 974–985. · DOI
  90. Kriegeskorte, N. et al (2009) Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: The dangers of double dipping. Nature Neuroscience 12(5): 535–540. · DOI · Paper page
  91. Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  92. Lahire, B. and Rosental C. (eds.) (2008) La cognition au prisme des sciences sociales. Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaines.
  93. Laudan, L. (1983) The demise of the demarcation problem. In: R.S. Cohen and L. Laudan (eds.) Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 111–127. · DOI
  94. Leiter, B. (2011) The demarcation problem in jurisprudence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31: 663–77. · DOI
  95. Levine, D. (1985) The Flight from Ambiguity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  96. Longino, H. (2013) Studying Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  97. Lorenz, E.N. (1993) The Essence of Chaos. Seattle: University of Washington Press. · DOI
  98. Machery, E. (2014) In defense of reverse inference. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65: 251–267. · DOI
  99. MacIntyre, A. (1957) What morality is not. Philosophy 32(123): 325–335. · DOI
  100. Maclean, A. (1984) What morality is. Philosophy 59(227): 21–37. · DOI
  101. Marazziti, D. and Baroni, S. (2012) Romantic love: The mistery [sic] of its biological roots. Clinical Neuropsychiatry 9: 14–19.
  102. Marazziti, D. et al (2013) The neurobiology of moral sense. Annals of General Psychiatry 12: 6. · DOI
  103. Margulies, D.S. (2012) The salmon of doubt. In: Choudhury S. and Slaby J. (eds.) Critical Neuroscience. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 273–286.
  104. Mauss, M. (1972/1950) A General Theory of Magic. London: Routledge and K. Paul.
  105. McKinnon, A. (2002) Sociological definitions, language games, and the ‘essence’ of religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 14: 61–83. · DOI
  106. Meloni, M. (2011) Philosophical implications of neuroscience: The space for a critique. Subjectivity 4: 298–322. · DOI
  107. Mole, C. and Klein, C. (2010) Confirmation, refutation, and the evidence of fMRI. In: Hanson S. and Bunzl. M. (eds.) Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping. Cambridge: MIT, pp. 99–111. · DOI
  108. Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R. and Eslinger, P.J. (2003) Morals and the human brain: A working model. NeuroReport 14: 299–305. · DOI
  109. Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R. and Zahn, R. (2008) The neural basis of moral cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124: 161–180. · DOI
  110. Morita, T. et al (2004) The neural substrates of conscious color perception demonstrated using fMRI. NeuroImage 21: 1665–1673. · DOI
  111. Murdoch, I. (1956) Vision and Choice in morality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 30: 32–58.
  112. Murdoch I. (1970) The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge & K. Paul.
  113. Murdoch, I. (1996/1957) Metaphysics and ethics. In: Antonaccio, M. and Schweiker, W. (eds.) Iris Murdoch and the Search for Human Goodness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 236–252.
  114. Noë, A. (2015) Strange Tools: Art and Human Nature. New York: Hill and Wang.
  115. Ogien, A. (2010) Normativité sociale et normativité neuronale. Revue française de sociologie 53: 637–656.
  116. Oliveira-Souza, R. de, Zahn, R. and Moll, J. (2015) Neural correlates of human morality: An overview. In: Decety, J. and Wheatley, T. (eds.) The Moral Brain. Cambridge: MIT, pp. 183–195. · DOI
  117. Ortega, F. and Vidal, F. (eds) (2011) Neurocultures. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  118. Outhwaite, W. (1983) Concept Formation in Social Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  119. Özdemir, E. et al (2006) Shared and distinct neural correlates of singing and speaking. NeuroImage 33: 628–35. · DOI
  120. Pardo, M. and Patterson, M. (2013) Minds, Brains, and Law. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  121. Parkinson, C. et al (2011) Is morality unified? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 3162–3180. · DOI
  122. Pascual L. et al (2013) How does morality work in the brain? Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 7: 65. · DOI
  123. Peng, Y. et al (2015) Sweet and bitter taste in the brain of awake behaving animals. Nature 527: 512–515. · DOI
  124. Pennock, R. (2011) Can’t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion? Synthese 178: 177–206. · DOI
  125. Pickersgill, M. (2013) The social life of the brain: Neuroscience in society. Current Sociology 61: 322–340. · DOI
  126. Pigliucci, M. and Boudry, M. (eds.) (2013) Philosophy of Pseudoscience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  127. Pincoffs, E (1971) Quandary ethics. Mind 80: 552–571. · DOI
  128. Poldrack, R.A. (2011) Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data. Neuron 72: 692–697. · DOI · Paper page
  129. Poldrack, R.A. and Farah, M. (2015) Progress and challenges in probing the human brain. Nature 526: 371–379. · DOI
  130. Post, P. et al (2011) Emily Post’s Etiquette. 18th ed. New York: William Morrow.
  131. Prehn, K. and Heekeren, H.R. (2014) Moral brains. In: Christen M. et al (eds.) Empirically Informed Ethics. Springer, pp. 137–157.
  132. Putnam, H. (2002) The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  133. Rauschecker, J.P. and Scott, S.K. (2009) Maps and streams in the auditory cortex. Nature Neuroscience 12: 718–724. · DOI · Paper page
  134. Reis, H.T. and Aron, A. (2008) Love: What is it, why does it matter, and how does it operate? Perspectives on Psychological Science 3: 80–86. · DOI
  135. Riesebrodt, M. (2010) The Promise of Salvation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  136. Rorty, R. (2004) Philosophy-envy. Daedalus 133: 18–24. · DOI
  137. Rose, N. and Abi-Rached, J. (2013) Neuro. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  138. Roseman, L. et al (2014) The effects of psilocybin and MDMA on between-network resting state functional connectivity in healthy volunteers. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 204. · DOI
  139. Rudner, R. (1953) The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. Philosophy of Science 20: 1–6. · DOI
  140. Runciman, W.G. (1969) The sociological explanation of ‘religious’ beliefs. European Journal of Sociology 10: 149–191. · DOI
  141. Searle, J. (2010) Making the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  142. Sextus, E. (1933) Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  143. Shulman, R. G. (2013) Brain Imaging: What it Can (and Cannot) Tell us About Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  144. Simmons, W.K. et al (2007) A common neural substrate for perceiving and knowing about color. Neuropsychologia 45: 2802–2810. · DOI
  145. Singh, I. and Rose, N. (2009) Biomarkers in psychiatry. Nature 460: 202–207. · DOI
  146. Slaby, J. (2010) Steps towards a critical neuroscience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9: 397–416. · DOI
  147. Spiro, M.E. (1966) Religion: Problems of definition and explanation. In: Banton, M. (ed.) Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. New York: Praeger, pp. 85–124.
  148. Stinchcombe, A.L. (1968) Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  149. Stinchcombe, A.L. (2005) The Logic of Social Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  150. Strauss, L. (1953) Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  151. Stroud, B. (2011) Epistemology, the history of epistemology, historical epistemology. Erkenntnis 75: 495–503. · DOI
  152. Tancredi, L. (2005) Hardwired Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  153. Taylor, C. (1985a) Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  154. Taylor, C. (1985b) Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  155. Tranel, D. et al (2003) The neural correlates of naming animals from their characteristic sounds. Neuropsychologia 41: 847–854. · DOI
  156. Uidhir, C.M. and Magnus, P.D. (2011) Art concept pluralism. Metaphilosophy 42: 83–97.
  157. Verplaetse, J. et al (eds.) (2009) The Moral Brain. Dordrecht: Springer.
  158. Vidal, F. and Ortega, F. (2012) Are there neural correlates of depression? In: Choudhury, S. and Slaby, J. (eds.) Critical Neuroscience. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 345–366.
  159. Waldron, J (1994) Vagueness in law and language. California Law Review 82: 509–40. · DOI
  160. Wallace, G. and Walker, A.D.M. (eds.) (1970) The Definition of Morality. London: Methuen.
  161. Wallis, R. (1977) The Road to Total Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.
  162. Walter, H. et al (2001) The neural correlates of driving. NeuroReport 12: 1763–1767. · DOI
  163. Williams, B. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  164. Wilson, D.M., Boughter, J.D., Jr. and Lemon, C.H. (2012) Bitter taste stimuli induce differential neural codes in mouse brain. PLoS One 7(7): e41597. · DOI
  165. Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  166. Wolfsdorf, D. (2003) Socrates’ pursuit of definitions. Phronesis 48: 271–312. · DOI
  167. Young, L. and Dungan, J. (2012) Where in the brain is morality? Social Neuroscience 7: 1–10. · DOI
  168. Zald, D., Hagen, M. and Pardo, J. (2002) Neural correlates of tasting concentrated quinine and sugar solutions. Journal of Neurophysiology 87: 1068–1075. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Abend, G.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Abend, Gabriel
ORCID
Abend, Gabriel
Venue
BioSocieties
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-08-11
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
415-438
ISSN
  • 1745-8552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-8560
DOI
10.1057/s41292-016-0019-y
OpenAlex
W2511092814
Cited by
51
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
BioSocieties (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
neural correlates, social-psychological phenomenon, operationalization, experimental paradigms, philosophy of neuroscience, interdisciplinary collaboration, morality, empathy, creativity, religious beliefs, love

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review