The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nationwide assessment of the mental health of UK Doctoral Researchers
Abstract
Doctoral Researchers (DRs) are an important part of the academic community and, after graduating, make substantial social and economic contributions. Despite this importance, DR wellbeing has long been of concern. Recent studies have concluded that DRs may be particularly vulnerable to mental health problems, yet direct comparisons of the prevalence of mental health problems between this population and control groups are lacking. Here, by comparing DRs with educated working controls, we show that DRs report significantly greater anxiety and depression, and that this difference is not explained by a higher rate of pre-existing mental health problems. Moreover, most DRs perceive poor mental health as a ‘normal’ part of the PhD process. Thus, our findings suggest a hazardous impact of PhD study on mental health, with DRs being particularly at risk of developing common mental health problems. This provides an evidence-based mandate for universities and funders to reflect upon practices related to DR training and mental health. Our attention should now be directed towards understanding what factors may explain heightened anxiety and depression among DRs so as to inform preventative measures and interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Overall, 32 non-peer-reviewed records were included52,54,107,111,118,125,132,135,138,148,177,178,191,196,202,206–222.”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [138]
In the citing paper
“The results of our study were slightly higher in the anxiety sub-scale, with previous studies indicating a smaller proportion of participants in the severe and extremely severe anxiety categories (between 15 and 22%; Hazell et al., 2021; Milicev et al., 2021; Sideropoulos et al., 2022).”
From The supervisory relationship as a predictor of mental health outcomes in doctoral students in the United Kingdom (2024) · cites this paper as Hazell et al., 2021
In the citing paper
“Hazell et al. (2021) found that UK doctoral students report significantly greater clinically relevant (mild to severe) symptoms of depression and anxiety compared to educated age-matched control groups, even after controlling for pre-existing mental health problems.”
From The supervisory relationship as a predictor of mental health outcomes in doctoral students in the United Kingdom (2024) · cites this paper as Hazell et al. (2021)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
The Validity of Two Versions of the GHQ in the WHO Study of Mental Illness in General Health Care
GOLDBERG, D. P., GATER, R., SARTORIUS, N., USTUN, T. B., PICCINELLI, M., GUREJE, O., & RUTTER, C. (1997) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291796004242 · Cited by 3,657 · cited 1×
“Instead, this study (Levecque et al., 2017) used the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ12) (Goldberg et al., 1997), which has been widely criticised for encouraging response biases, lack of reliability, and limited clinical validity (Hankins, 2008a, 2008b; Ye, 2009).”
MethodOsman, A., Bagge, C. L., Gutierrez, P. M., Konick, L. C., Kopper, B. A., & Barrios, F. X. (2001) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/107319110100800409 · Cited by 2,276 · cited 11×
“A concerning 35% of DRs (and WPs) met criteria for ‘suicide risk’, using measure thresholds derived for the general population (Osman et al., 2001b).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSuicide, Suicide Attempts, and Suicidal Ideation
Klonsky, E. D., May, A. M., & Saffer, B. Y. (2016) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093204 · Cited by 1,675 · cited 1×
“Suicidality can broadly be conceptualised as thoughts (e.g. ideation) and action (e.g. planning and attempts) (Klonsky et al., 2016), and after examining full-scale scores we decided to carry out the additional item-level analysis.”
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008 · Cited by 1,182 · cited 6×
“The difference between these findings could reflect differences in the outcome measures employed; Levecque et al. (2017) used the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) (Goldberg, 1972), whereas we used the PHQ-9 (Spitzer et al., 1999) and GAD-7 (Spitzer et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPersonality factors and suicide risk in a representative sample of the German general population
Blüml, V., Kapusta, N. D., Doering, S., Brähler, E., Wagner, B., & Kersting, A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076646 · Cited by 102
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Altman EG, Hedeker D, Peterson JL, Davis JM (1997) The Altman self-rating Mania scale. Biol Psychiatry 42:948–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00548-3 · DOI
- Berry C, Niven J, Hazell C (2021) Personal, social and relational predictors of UK postgraduate researcher mental health problems. BJPsych Open, 7:E205. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.1041 · DOI · Paper page
- Casey BH (2009) The economic contribution of PhDs. J High Educ Policy Manag 31:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800902974294 · DOI
- Castaneda AE, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Marttunen M et al. (2008) A review on cognitive impairments in depressive and anxiety disorders with a focus on young adults. J Affect Disord 106:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.06.006 · DOI
- Castillejos MC, Huertas P, Martín P, Moreno Küstner B (2020) Prevalence of suicidality in the european general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Suicide Res 0:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2020.1765928 · DOI
- Goldberg DP (1972) The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. Maudsley Monogr 21: Oxford University Press
- Hankins M (2008a) Clinical Practice and Epidemiology Executive function abnormalities in pathological gamblers. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 6:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-4-Received · DOI
- Hankins M (2008b) The reliability of the twelve-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) under realistic assumptions. BMC Public Health 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-355 · DOI
- Hazell CM, Chapman L, Valeix SF et al. (2020) Understanding the mental health of doctoral researchers: a mixed methods systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Syst Rev 9:1–30 · DOI · Paper page
- Henderson C, Evans-Lacko S, Flach C, Thornicroft G (2012) Responses to mental health stigma questions: the importance of social desirability and data collection method. Can J Psychiatry 57:152–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371205700304 · DOI
- Kehm BM (2006) Doctoral education in Europe and North America: a comparative analysis. In: Teichler U (ed) The formative years of scholars. Wenner-Gren International Series. Portland Press, London, UK, pp. 67–78
- Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O et al. (2005) Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:593–602. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · DOI · Paper page
- Kessler RC, Üstün BB (2004) The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 13:93–117 · DOI · Paper page
- Metcalfe J, Wilson S, Levecque K (2018) Exploring wellbeing and mental health and associated support services for postgraduate researchers. Cambridge
- Nature (2019a) The mental health of PhD researchers demands urgent attention. Nature 575:257–258. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03489-1 · DOI
- Nature (2019b) Academia’s mental-health woes. Nature 569:307
- Osman A, Bagge CL, Gutierrez PM et al. (2001b) The Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R): validation with clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment 8:443–454 · DOI · Paper page
- Polatöz Ö, Kuğu N, Doğan O, Akyüz G (2011) The prevalence of suicidal behaviour and its correlation with certain sociodemographic variables in Sivas province. Dusunen Adam J Psychiatry Neurol Sci 24:13–23. https://doi.org/10.5350/dajpn2011240102 · DOI
- Rock PL, Roiser JP, Riedel WJ, Blackwell AD (2014) Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 44:2029–2040. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713002535 · DOI · Paper page
- Shackman AJ, Sarinopoulos I, Maxwell JS et al. (2006) Anxiety selectively disrupts visuospatial working memory. Emotion 6:40–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.40 · DOI · Paper page
- Shields GS, Moons WG, Tewell CA, Yonelineas AP (2016) Anxiety not anger impairs executive functionioning. Emotion 16:792–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.06.014.Chronic · DOI
- Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW et al. (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Arch Intern Med 166:1092. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · DOI · Paper page
- Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Group PHQPCS (1999) Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ Primary Care Study. JAMA 282:1737. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · DOI · Paper page
- Woolston C (2019) PhD poll reveals fear and joy, contentment and anguish. Nature 575:403–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03459-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Woolston C (2020) Pandemic and panic for US graduate students. Nature 585:147–148. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02439-6 · DOI
- Ye S (2009) Factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): The role of wording effects. Pers Individ Dif 46:197–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.027 · DOI
- Zhang XC, Kuchinke L, Woud ML et al. (2017) Survey method matters: online/offline questionnaires and face-to-face or telephone interviews differ. Comput Hum Behav 71:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.006 · DOI
- Zolas N, Goldschlag N, Jarmin R et al. (2015) Wrapping it up in a person: examining employment and earnings outcomes for Ph.D. recipients. Science (80–) 350:1367–1371. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac5949 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mavrogalou-Foti, A. P., Kambouri, M. A., & Çili, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1437819 · Cited by 34
Dreisoerner, A., Goetz, V., Frohnmayer, D., Tran, U. S., Voracek, M., & Nater, U. M. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02505-5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Hazell, C. M., Niven, J. E., Chapman, L., Roberts, P. E., Cartwright-Hatton, S., Valeix, S., & Berry, C.
- Venue
- Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
- Published
- 2021-12-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2662-9992
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nationwide assessment of the mental health of UK Doctoral Researchers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/s41599-021-00983-8
- The paper
- Hazell, C. M., Niven, J. E., Chapman, L., Roberts, P. E., Cartwright-Hatton, S., Valeix, S., & Berry, C. (2021). Nationwide assessment of the mental health of UK Doctoral Researchers. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00983-8
