The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smart City Digital Twin–Enabled Energy Management: Toward Real-Time Urban Building Energy Benchmarking
Abstract
To meet energy-reduction goals, cities are challenged with assessing building energy performance and prioritizing efficiency upgrades across existing buildings. Although current top-down building energy benchmarking approaches are useful for identifying overall efficient and poor performers across a portfolio of buildings at a city scale, they are limited in their ability to provide actionable insights regarding efficiency opportunities. Concurrently, advances in smart metering data analytics combined with new data streams available via smart metering infrastructure present the opportunity to incorporate previously undetectable temporal fluctuations into top-down building benchmarking analyses. This paper leveraged smart meter electricity data to develop daily building energy benchmarks segmented by strategic periods to quantify their variation from conventional, annual energy benchmarking strategies and investigate how such metrics can lead to near real-time energy management. The periods considered include occupied periods during the school year, unoccupied periods during the school year, occupied periods during the summer, unoccupied periods during the summer, and peak summer demand periods. Results showed that temporally segmented building energy benchmarks are distinct from a building’s overall benchmark. This demonstrates that a building’s overall benchmark masks periods in which a building is over- or underperforming during the day, week, or month; thus, temporally segmented energy benchmarks can provide a more specific and accurate measure for building efficiency. We discussed how these findings establish the foundation for digital twin–enabled urban energy management platforms by enabling identification of building retrofit strategies and near-real-time efficiency in the context of the performance of an entire building portfolio. Temporally segmented energy benchmarking measures generated from smart meter data streams are a critical step for integrating smart meter analytics with building energy benchmarking techniques, and for conducting smarter energy management across a large geographic scale of buildings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526
Review of Smart Meter Data Analytics: Applications, Methodologies, and Challenges
Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Hong, T., & Kang, C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2018.2818167 · Cited by 1,369
Bretz, F., Hothorn, T., & Westfall, P. (2016) · doi:10.1201/9781420010909 · Cited by 1,233 · cited 1×
“Each hypothesis was tested for each building, introducing the multiple comparison problem, which increases the probability of committing a Type I error (Bretz et al. 2010).”
MethodThe dark side of occupants’ behaviour on building energy use
Masoso, O. T., & Grobler, L. J. (2010) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.009 · Cited by 683
Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards
Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T. P., & McArdle, G. (2015) · Regional Studies, Regional Science · doi:10.1080/21681376.2014.983149 · Cited by 596
Decision Tree and SVM-Based Data Analytics for Theft Detection in Smart Grid
Jindal, A., Dua, A., Kaur, K., Singh, M., Kumar, N., & Mishra, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2016.2543145 · Cited by 547
Pérez-Lombard, L., Ortiz, J., González, R., & Maestre, I. R. (2009) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.10.004 · Cited by 459
Harrison, C., & Donnelly, I. A. (2011) · Cited by 400
Review of building energy-use performance benchmarking methodologies
Chung, W. (2011) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.022 · Cited by 389
Understanding the energy consumption and occupancy of a multi-purpose academic building
Gul, M., & Patidar, S. (2014) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.11.027 · Cited by 349
Cited by
Digital twin: benefits, use cases, challenges, and opportunities
Attaran, M., & Celik, B. G. (2023) · Decision Analytics Journal · doi:10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100165 · Cited by 704
Ramu, S. P., Boopalan, P., Pham, Q.-V., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Huynh-The, T., Alazab, M., Nguyen, T. T., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2022) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103663 · Cited by 301
A Survey on Digital Twin for Industrial Internet of Things: Applications, Technologies and Tools
Xu, H., Wu, J., Pan, Q., Guan, X., & Guizani, M. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3297395 · Cited by 304
Pregnolato, M., Gunner, S., Voyagaki, E., De Risi, R., Carhart, N., Gavriel, G., Tully, P., Tryfonas, T., Macdonald, J., & Taylor, C. (2022) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104421 · Cited by 253
Leveraging Digital Twin for Sustainability Assessment of an Educational Building
Tagliabue, L. C., Cecconi, F. R., Maltese, S., Rinaldi, S., Ciribini, A. L. C., & Flammini, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020480 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Francisco, A., Mohammadi, N., & Taylor, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management in Engineering
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0742-597X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5479
- OpenAlex
- W2994200381
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 17.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smart City Digital Twin–Enabled Energy Management: Toward Real-Time Urban Building Energy Benchmarking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000741
- The paper
- Francisco, A., Mohammadi, N., & Taylor, J. E. (2020). Smart City Digital Twin–Enabled Energy Management: Toward Real-Time Urban Building Energy Benchmarking. Journal of Management in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.