Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stabilization of Demolition Materials for Pavement Base/Subbase Applications Using Fly Ash and Slag Geopolymers: Laboratory Investigation

Mohammadinia, Alireza, Arulrajah, Arul, Sanjayan, Jay, Disfani, Mahdi M., Win Bo, Myint, Darmawan, Stephen·2016·Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

Abstract

The use of recycled construction and demolition (C&D) materials in unbound and cement stabilized pavement base/subbase applications has generated growing interest in recent years. C&D materials consisting of crushed brick (CB), recycled crushed aggregate (RCA), and reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) have been investigated in unbound and cement stabilized pavement base/subbase applications. However, the high carbon footprint of using cement for pavement base/subbase stabilization has led to this research to seek alternative low-carbon binders. This study evaluates the behavior of C&D materials when stabilized with geopolymers. Fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (S) were used as pozzolanic binders and a different alkaline activator solution to pozzolanic binder ratio was tested. A maximum of 4% of dry weight of soil was used for geopolymer stabilization of the C&D materials. The binders used were either 4% FA, 2% FA+ 2% S, or 4% S. The geotechnical engineering and strength properties of these geopolymer-stabilized C&D materials were evaluated to ascertain their performance for pavement base/subbase applications. Elastic modulus, compressive strength, and resilient modulus of the blends were tested and analyzed in this research. Both the resilient modulus of the C&D materials and compressive strength were found to increase as a result of geopolymer stabilization. Geopolymer stabilization was found to be most effective for RCA. Higher compressive strength will be achieved by slag-based geopolymer stabilization when compared with fly ash–based geopolymer stabilization. The effect of alkaline activator to pozzolanic binder ratio on the enhancement of geotechnical properties of C&D materials was also analyzed. The performance of the geopolymer-stabilized C&D materials was furthermore compared with that of traditional cement-stabilized C&D materials. Geopolymer-stabilized RCA and RAP were found to be a viable and sustainable option for the stabilization of future pavement bases/subbases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001526

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Mohammadinia, A., Arulrajah, A., Sanjayan, J., Disfani, M. M., Win Bo, M., & Darmawan, S.
Venue
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2016-07
Volume
28
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0899-1561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5533
OpenAlex
W2257308177
Cited by
158
References
1
FWCI
23.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stabilization of Demolition Materials for Pavement Base/Subbase Applications Using Fly Ash and Slag Geopolymers: Laboratory Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001526
The paper
Mohammadinia, A., Arulrajah, A., Sanjayan, J., Disfani, M. M., Win Bo, M., & Darmawan, S. (2016). Stabilization of Demolition Materials for Pavement Base/Subbase Applications Using Fly Ash and Slag Geopolymers: Laboratory Investigation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001526

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.