The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Method for the calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers
Abstract
The determination of the spring constants of atomic force microscope (AFM) cantilevers is of fundamental importance to users of the AFM. In this paper, a fast and nondestructive method for the evaluation of the spring constant which relies solely on the determination of the unloaded resonant frequency of the cantilever, a knowledge of its density or mass, and its dimensions is proposed. This is in contrast to the method of Cleveland et al. [Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 403 (1993)], which requires the attachment of masses to the cantilever in the determination of the spring constant. A number of factors which can influence the resonant frequency are examined, in particular (i) gold coating, which can result in a dramatic variation in the resonant frequency, for which a theoretical account is presented and (ii) air damping which, it is found, leads to a shift of ∼4% in the resonant frequency down on its value in a vacuum. Furthermore, the point of load on the cantilever is found to be extremely important, since a small variation in the load point can lead to a dramatic variation in the spring constant. Theoretical results that account for this variation, which, it is believed will be of great practical value to the users of the AFM, are given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Calibration of rectangular atomic force microscope cantilevers
Sader, J. E., Chon, J. W. M., & Mulvaney, P. (1999) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.1150021 · Cited by 2,145
Self-citationMicromechanical cantilever-based biosensors
Raiteri, R., Grattarola, M., Butt, H.-J., & Skládal, P. (2001) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/s0925-4005(01)00856-5 · Cited by 734
Short cantilevers for atomic force microscopy
Walters, D. A., Cleveland, J. P., Thomson, N. H., Hansma, P. K., Wendman, M. A., Gurley, G., & Elings, V. (1996) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.1147177 · Cited by 494
Comparison of calibration methods for atomic-force microscopy cantilevers
Burnham, N. A., Chen, X., Hodges, C. S., Matei, G. A., Thoreson, E. J., Roberts, C. J., Davies, M. C., & Tendler, S. J. B. (2003) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/14/1/301 · Cited by 458
AFM: a versatile tool in biophysics
Alessandrini, A., & Facci, P. (2005) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/16/6/r01 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Sader, J. E., Larson, I., Mulvaney, P., & White, L. R.
- Venue
- Review of Scientific Instruments
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1995-07-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3789-3798
- ISSN
- 0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7623
- OpenAlex
- W1993004731
- Cited by
- 1,000
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Method for the calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1145439
- The paper
- Sader, J. E., Larson, I., Mulvaney, P., & White, L. R. (1995). Method for the calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers. Review of Scientific Instruments. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1145439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.