Cited by 91Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeural Networks and Applications

Learning the invariance properties of complex cells from their responses to natural stimuli

Einhäuser, Wolfgang, Kayser, Christoph, König, Peter, Körding, Konrad P.·2002·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Neurons in primary visual cortex are typically classified as either simple or complex. Whereas simple cells respond strongly to grating and bar stimuli displayed at a certain phase and visual field location, complex cell responses are insensitive to small translations of the stimulus within the receptive field [Hubel & Wiesel (1962) J. Physiol. (Lond.), 160, 106-154; Kjaer et al. (1997) J. Neurophysiol., 78, 3187-3197]. This constancy in the response to variations of the stimuli is commonly called invariance. Hubel and Wiesel's classical model of the primary visual cortex proposes a connectivity scheme which successfully describes simple and complex cell response properties. However, the question as to how this connectivity arises during normal development is left open. Based on their work and inspired by recent physiological findings we suggest a network model capable of learning from natural stimuli and developing receptive field properties which match those of cortical simple and complex cells. Stimuli are drawn from videos obtained by a camera mounted to a cat's head, so they should approximate the natural input to the cat's visual system. The network uses a competitive scheme to learn simple and complex cell response properties. Employing delayed signals to learn connections between simple and complex cells enables the model to utilize temporal properties of the input. We show that the temporal structure of the input gives rise to the emergence and refinement of complex cell receptive fields, whereas removing temporal continuity prevents this processes. This model lends a physiologically based explanation of the development of complex cell invariance response properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01885.x

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IT neurons have vast receptive fields and respond selectively to certain objects or parts of objects across large changes in size, position and illumination.

    “IT neurons have vast receptive fields and respond selectively to certain objects or parts of objects across large changes in size, position and illumination [39,40].”
  • IT cortex is well known for its role in invariant object recognition.

    “For example, inferotemporal (IT) cortex is well known for its role in invariant object recognition.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Einhäuser, W., Kayser, C., König, P., & Körding, K. P.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
475-486
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2134309959
Cited by
91
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
complex cells, simple cells, primary visual cortex, invariance, receptive field development, naturalistic stimuli, competitive learning, cat visual system, network models
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Learning, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Video Recording, Visual Cortex, Visual Fields, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review