Cited by 134Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeural dynamics and brain function

Comparison of computational models of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex

Bogacz, Rafal, Brown, Malcolm W.·2003·Hippocampus

Abstract

This study compares the efficiency and plausibility of published computational models of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex. Substantial evidence indicates that the perirhinal cortex is involved in both the familiarity discrimination aspect of recognition memory and in perceptual functions involved with representations of complete stimuli (i.e., object identification). Published models of how the perirhinal cortex may perform familiarity discrimination can be divided into two groups. The first group assumes that a proportion of perirhinal neurons form a network specialised just for familiarity discrimination (these models may be based on Hebbian or anti‐Hebbian synaptic plasticity). In contrast, the second group assumes that both familiarity discrimination and learning representations of complete stimuli are performed within a single combined network. This study establishes that when the responses of neurons that provide input to the familiarity discrimination network are correlated (as indicated by experimental data), specialised networks based on anti‐Hebbian learning may recognise the previous occurrence of many more stimuli (i.e., have a capacity up to thousands of times larger) than specialised networks based on Hebbian learning. The currently published combined models do not learn an optimal stimulus representation (they do not fully extract statistically independent features), and hence their capacities are even lower than those of the specialised models based on Hebbian learning. Hence, the combined models published thus far are critically less efficient than the specialised models based on anti‐Hebbian learning. This study also compares the consistency of the models with experimental observations concerning what is known of synaptic plasticity in the perirhinal cortex and the responses of its neurons. Many theoretically important parameters remain undetermined, and experiments are suggested to provide information critical for refining and distinguishing between the various models. However, the above theoretical arguments and currently published data favour the existence of a separate network specialised for familiarity discrimination. Hippocampus 2003;13:494–524. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.10093

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This depression of synaptic efficacy could contribute to the repetition suppression of neural responses in areas such as the perirhinal cortex.

    “This depression of synaptic efficacy could contribute to the repetition suppression of neural responses in areas such as the perirhinal cortex (Bogacz and Brown, 2003; Warburton et al., 2003).”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Bogacz and Brown, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bogacz, R., & Brown, M. W.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, Malcolm W.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
494-524
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W1976921223
Cited by
134
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
perirhinal cortex, recognition memory, computational model, anti-Hebbian learning, Hebbian learning, synaptic plasticity, object identification, stimulus representation, neural network capacity
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Simulation, Discrimination, Psychological, Humans, Memory, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Parahippocampal Gyrus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review