The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast shuttling of ions in a scalable Penning trap array
Open accessAbstract
We report on the design and testing of an array of Penning ion traps made from printed circuit board. The system enables fast shuttling of ions from one trapping zone to another, which could be of use in quantum information processing. We describe simulations carried out to determine the optimal potentials to be applied to the trap electrodes for enabling this movement. The results of a preliminary experiment with a cloud of laser cooled calcium ions demonstrate a round-trip shuttling efficiency of up to 75%.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This contrasts with earlier non-adiabatic radial transport of ensembles of ions in Penning traps, in which a good fraction of the ions were lost in each transport.
“This contrasts with earlier non-adiabatic radial transport of ensembles of ions in Penning traps, in which a good fraction of the ions were lost in each transport49.”
From Penning micro-trap for quantum computing (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
Architecture for a large-scale ion-trap quantum computer
Kielpinski, D., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00784 · Cited by 1,589
Experimental and theoretical challenges for the trapped electron quantum computer
Marzoli, I., Tombesi, P., Ciaramicoli, G., Werth, G., Bushev, P., Stahl, S., Schmidt-Kaler, F., Hellwig, M., Henkel, C., Marx, G., et al. (2009) · Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/42/15/154010 · Cited by 33
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 2008, Phys. Rep., 469, 155, 10.1016/j.physrep.2008.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 2003, Nature (London), 422, 408, 10.1038/nature01494 · DOI · Paper page
- 2003, Nature (London), 422, 412, 10.1038/nature01492 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Nature (London), 438, 639, 10.1038/nature04251 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Nature (London), 438, 643, 10.1038/nature04279 · DOI
- 2004, Nature (London), 429, 737, 10.1038/nature02608 · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, Appl. Phys. Lett., 88, 034101, 10.1063/1.2164910 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, Quantum Inf. Comput., 2, 257
- 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 250501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.250501 · DOI
- 2007, J. Mod. Opt., 54, 1581, 10.1080/09500340600736793 · DOI
- 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 2351, 10.1364/OE.16.002351 · DOI
- 2009, Quantum Inf. Comput., 9, 0920
- 2003, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 204, 478, 10.1016/S0168-583X(02)02115-8 · DOI
- CHICSi Development Group, 2003, Phys. Scr., T, T104, 107, 10.1238/Physica.Topical.104a00107 · DOI
- 1982, Phys. Rev. A, 25, 35, 10.1103/PhysRevA.25.35 · DOI
- 2008, New J. Phys., 10, 013004, 10.1088/1367-2630/10/1/013004 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Surface code quantum computing by lattice surgery
Horsman, D., Fowler, A. G., Devitt, S., & Meter, R. V. (2012) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/12/123011 · Cited by 598
“However, the requirement for transversal two-qubit gates has previously made a planar encoding unfeasible for many systems where the physical qubits are confined in 2D and subject only to NN interactions, such as quantum dots [11, 12], superconducting qubits [13, 14], trapped atoms [15], nitrogen-vacancy (NV) diamond…”
BackgroundPenning micro-trap for quantum computing
Jain, S., Sägesser, T., Hrmo, P., Torkzaban, C., Stadler, M., Oswald, R., Axline, C., Bautista-Salvador, A., Ospelkaus, C., Kienzler, D., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07111-x · Cited by 33
“We note that the coherence”
Scalable arrays of micro-penning traps for quantum computing and simulation
Jain, S., Alonso, J., Grau, M., & Home, J. P. (2020) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.031027 · Cited by 30
Hellwig, M., Bautista-Salvador, A., Singer, K., Werth, G., & Schmidt-Kaler, F. (2010) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/6/065019 · Cited by 21
McMahon, B., & Sawyer, B. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.17.014005 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Crick, D. R., Donnellan, S., Ananthamurthy, S., Thompson, R. C., & Segal, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Venue
- Review of Scientific Instruments
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2010-01-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 013111-013111
- ISSN
- 0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7623
- OpenAlex
- W2069737736
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Review of Scientific Instruments (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints@Bangalore University (Bangalore University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- Penning ion trap, ion shuttling, laser cooling, calcium ions, quantum information processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review