A theory crack healing in polymers
Abstract
A theory of crack healing in polymers is presented in terms of the stages of crack healing, namely, (a) surface rearrangement, (b) surface approach, (c) wetting, (d) diffusion, and (e) randomization. The recovery ratio R of mechanical properties with time was determined as a convolution product, R = Rh (t)*φ(t), where Rh (t) is an intrinsic healing function, and φ(t) is a wetting distribution function for the crack interface or plane in the material. The reptation model of a chain in a tube was used to describe self-diffusion of interpenetrating random coil chains which formed a basis for Rh (t). Applications of the theory are described, including crack healing in amorphous polymers and melt processing of polymer resins by injection or compression molding. Relations are developed for fracture stress σ, strain ε, and energy E as a function of time t, temperature T, pressure P, and molecular weight M. Results include (i) during healing or processing at t<t∞, σ,ε∼t1/4, E∼t1/2; (ii) at constant t<t∞, σ,ε∼M−1/4, E∼M−1/2; (iii) in the fully interpenetrated healed state at t = t∞, σ,ε∼M1/2, E∼M; (iv) the time to achieve complete healing, t∞ ∼M3, ∼exp P, ∼exp 1/T. Chain fracture, creep, and stress relaxation are also discussed. New concepts for strength predictions are introduced.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intrinsic self-healing polymers rely on reversible molecular mechanisms-thermally reversible bonds, hydrogen bonding, or chain interdiffusion-to achieve multiple healing cycles without requiring the external delivery of healing agents.
“Intrinsic self-healing polymers, in particular, rely on reversible molecular mechanisms-thermally reversible bonds, hydrogen bonding, or chain interdiffusion-to achieve multiple healing cycles without requiring the external delivery of healing agents (Wool and O'Connor, 1981;Kim and Wool, 1983;Blaiszik et al., 2010).”
From A thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode cohesive zone model for fracture of self-healing materials (2026) · cites this paper as Wool and O'Connor, 1981
Cites
Williams, M. L., Landel, R. F., & Ferry, J. D. (1955) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01619a008 · Cited by 8,083 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Autonomic healing of polymer composites
White, S. R., Sottos, N. R., Geubelle, P. H., Moore, J. S., Kessler, M. R., Sriram, S. R., Brown, E. N., & Viswanathan, S. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057232 · Cited by 4,575 · see citing works
Fracture testing of a self-healing polymer composite
Brown, E. N., Sottos, N. R., & White, S. R. (2002) · Experimental Mechanics · doi:10.1007/bf02412141 · Cited by 698 · see citing works
Linear/Network Poly(ε-caprolactone) Blends Exhibiting Shape Memory Assisted Self-Healing (SMASH)
Rodriguez, E. D., Luo, X., & Mather, P. T. (2011) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am101012c · Cited by 381 · see citing works
A chiroselective peptide replicator
Saghatelian, A., Yokobayashi, Y., Soltani, K., & Ghadiri, M. R. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057238 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
A continuum damage mechanics framework for modeling micro-damage healing
Darabi, M. K., Abu Al-Rub, R. K., & Little, D. N. (2012) · International Journal of Solids and Structures · doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.10.017 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Nji, J., & Li, G. (2012) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/21/2/025011 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Alsheghri, A. A., & Abu Al-Rub, R. K. (2016) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.06.010 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Thermodynamic-based cohesive zone healing model for self-healing materials
Alsheghri, A. A., & Abu Al-Rub, R. K. (2015) · Mechanics Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2015.10.003 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Modeling of self-healing effects in polymeric composites
Bluhm, J., Specht, S., & Schröder, J. (2015) · Archive of Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1007/s00419-014-0946-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
A thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode cohesive zone model for fracture of self-healing materials
Giraldo-Londoño, O., Spring, D. W., Muñetón-López, R. A., & Paulino, G. H. (2026) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7528848
- Authors
- Wool, R. P., & O’Connor, K. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Department of Metallurgy and Mining Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
- ORCID
- Wool, R. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1981-10-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5953-5963
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2045368871
- Cited by
- 1,093
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 71 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Army Research Office
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
- Keywords
- crack healing, polymers, surface rearrangement, surface approach, wettability, self-diffusion, reptation model, recovery ratio, amorphous polymers, injection molding, compression molding, fracture stress, fracture energy, healing kinetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review