Cited by 102Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies

Communication: Exciton–phonon information flow in the energy transfer process of photosynthetic complexes

Open access
Rebentrost, Patrick, Aspuru-Guzik, Alán·2011·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Non-Markovian and nonequilibrium phonon effects are believed to be key ingredients in the energy transfer in photosynthetic complexes, especially in complexes which exhibit a regime of intermediate exciton–phonon coupling. In this work, we utilize a recently developed measure for non-Markovianity to elucidate the exciton–phonon dynamics in terms of the information flow between electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom. We study the measure in the hierarchical equation of motion approach which captures strong coupling effects and nonequilibrium molecular reorganization. We propose an additional trace distance measure for the information flow that could be extended to other master equations. We find that for a model dimer system and for the Fenna–Matthews–Olson complex the non-Markovianity is significant under physiological conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3563617

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A careful preparation of the initial environmental state allows control of the information flow between the system and its environment and observation of the transition from the Markovian to the non-Markovian regime through quantum state tomography on the open system.

    “It was shown further that a careful preparation of the initial environmental state allows to control the information flow between the system and its environment and to observe the transition from the Markovian to the non-Markovian regime through quantum state tomography carried out on the open system.”

    From Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity (2012) · cites this paper as [44]

  • A complete determination of the non-Markovianity measure is experimentally possible, including the realization of the maximization over initial states in the definition.

    “It has been demonstrated that a complete determination of the measure is experimentally possible, including the realization of the maximization over initial states in the definition (76).”

    From Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity (2012) · cites this paper as [44]

  • Two experiments determining the non-Markovianity measure have been carried out employing photons moving in optical fibers or birefringent materials.

    “Quite recently, two experiments determining this quantity have been carried out employing photons moving in optical fibers or birefringent materials [44, 45].”

    From Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity (2012) · cites this paper as [44]

  • Both the quantum measure for non-Markovianity and the witness for initial system-environment correlations have been demonstrated to be experimentally measurable quantities.

    “Both the quantum measure for non-Markovianity and the witness for initial systemenvironment correlations studied here have been demonstrated very recently to be experimentally measurable quantities [44, 45, 48, 49].”

    From Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity (2012) · cites this paper as [44]

  • In these experiments, the open system is provided by the polarization degrees of freedom of the photons, while the environment is given by their frequency (mode) degrees of freedom.

    “In these experiments the open system is provided by the polarization degrees of freedom of the photons, while the environment is given by their frequency (mode) degrees of freedom.”

    From Foundations and measures of quantum non-Markovianity (2012) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [2]Y.-C. Cheng and G. R. Fleming, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 60 , 241 (2009).
  2. [5]G. Panitchayangkoon, D. Hayes, K. A. Fransted, J. R. Caram, E. Harel, J. Wen, R. E. Blankenship, and G. S. Engel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences p. 1 (2010).
  3. [7]M. Mohseni, P. Rebentrost, S. Lloyd, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, The Journal of Chemical Physics 129 , 174106 (2008).
  4. [8]P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, I. Kassal, S. Lloyd, and A. AspuruGuzik, New Journal of Physics 11 , 033003 (2009).
  5. [9]M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, New Journal of Physics 10 , 113019 (2008).
  6. [10]J. Wu, F. Liu, Y. Shen, J. Cao, and R. J. Silbey, http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.2236 (2010). · arXiv
  7. [11]O. M¨ ulken and T. Schmid, Physical Review E 82 (2010).
  8. [13]F. Fassioli and A. Olaya-Castro, http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3610 (2010). · arXiv
  9. [14]F. Caruso, A. Chin, A. Datta, S. Huelga, and M. Plenio, Physical Review A 81 , 1 (2010).
  10. [15]S. Jang, Y.-C. Cheng, D. R. Reichman, and J. D. Eaves, The Journal of Chemical Physics 129 , 101104 (2008).
  11. Letters 103 , 3 (2009).
  12. [17]J. Piilo, S. Maniscalco, K. H¨ ark¨ onen, and K.-A. Suominen, Physical Review Letters 100 , 1 (2008).
  13. [18]P. Rebentrost, R. Chakraborty, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, The Journal of Chemical Physics 131 , 184102 (2009).
  14. [19]M. Thorwart, J. Eckel, J. Reina, P. Nalbach, and S. Weiss, Chemical Physics Letters 478 , 234 (2009).
  15. [20]J. Prior, A. Chin, S. Huelga, and M. Plenio, Physical Review Letters 105 , 1 (2010).
  16. [21]A. Ishizaki and G. R. Fleming, The Journal of Chemical Physics 130 , 234110 (2009).
  17. [22]A. Ishizaki and G. R. Fleming, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 , 17255 (2009).
  18. [23]A. Ishizaki and G. R. Fleming, The Journal of Chemical Physics 130 , 234111 (2009).
  19. [24]A. K. Rajagopal, A. R. U. Devi, and R. W. Rendell, http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.4498 (2010). · arXiv
  20. [26]M. Wolf, J. Eisert, T. Cubitt, and J. Cirac, Physical Review Letters 101 , 1 (2008).
  21. [27]A. Rivas, S. Huelga, and M. Plenio, Physical Review Letters 105 , 1 (2010).
  22. [29]Q. Shi, L. Chen, G. Nan, R.-X. Xu, and Y. Yan, The Journal of Chemical Physics 130 , 084105 (2009).
  23. [31]J. Yuen-Zhou, M. Mohseni, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4866 (2010). · arXiv
  24. [32]T. Mancal, A. V. Pisliakov, and G. R. Fleming, The Journal of Chemical Physics 124 , 234504 (2006).
  25. [33]A. V. Pisliakov, T. Mancal, and G. R. Fleming, The Journal of Chemical Physics 124 , 234505 (2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rebentrost, P., & Aspuru-Guzik, A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Harvard University Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, , 12 Oxford St., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2011-03-10
Volume
134
Issue
10
Pages
101103-101103
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1993739693
Cited by
102
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 24
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0001088)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Keywords
exciton-phonon coupling, non-Markovianity, information flow, photosynthetic energy transfer, Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex, hierarchical equations of motion, trace distance, strong coupling, dimer model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review