Cited by 106Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureOccupational exposure and asthma

Exposure to mite and cat allergens on a range of clothing items at home and the transfer of cat allergen in the workplace

Open access
De Lucca, Sandra D., O’Meara, Timothy J., Tovey, Euan R.·2000·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Clothing has been proposed as an additional source of exposure to mite and cat allergens. Dispersal of allergen into public places has also been attributed to clothing.Objectives We sought to study the contribution of various types of clothing on mite and cat exposure in a domestic environment. Also, we studied the ability of clothing to transfer allergen in a workplace.Methods Personal exposure to mite and cat allergen from a range of clothing was measured by using intranasal air samplers in 11 homes. Five categories of clothing were tested. Wearing no upper clothing was the sixth category tested to distinguish the contribution of clothing over ambient background exposure. An adhesive tape was used to sample allergen from the surface of clothing, and reservoir dust samples were also collected. The above techniques were also used in the workplace to examine the amount of cat allergen transferred from cat owners to non-cat owners.Results The amount of mite and cat allergen inhaled differed among the clothing types worn and whether they had been washed recently. Wearing a woolen sweater increased personal allergen exposure to cat and mite allergen by a mean of 11 and 10 times, respectively. Clothing items that were less frequently washed carried more allergen whether assessed by vacuuming or sampled with adhesive tape. This corresponded to the amount of allergen inhaled. We also found that cat levels on non-cat owners' clothing increased significantly at the end of a working day, which lead to the increase in their personal allergen exposure to cat.Conclusions These studies strongly support the emerging model that personal clothing is an important source of both mite and cat allergen exposure. This article also demonstrates the importance of clothing as a means of distributing cat allergen into cat-free environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mai.2000.110804

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clothing serves as a vehicle for transporting cat allergens into cat-free environments, where they subsequently settle on surfaces and become suspended in the air.

    “Clothing serves as a vehicle for transporting cat allergens into cat-free environments, where they subsequently settle on surfaces and become suspended in the air [70].”

    From Advance in Managing Indoor Cat Allergen Proteins: Molecular Insights, Detection, and Control (2025) · cites this paper as [70]

    The conclusion (p. 879) identifies clothing as a means of transferring cat allergen into cat-free environments. The Discussion reports cat allergen in floor dust even in homes without cats, and the workplace air-sampling results (p. 877) detect airborne cat-allergen particles. The paper does not establish the claimed sequence in which allergen transported on clothing subsequently settles on surfaces and becomes airborne there. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]19. Sercombe JK, Pavlicek PK, Xavier ML, Lea SA, Graham JAH. Assess- ment of nasal and pocket air samplers [abstract]. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;101:S80.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Lucca, S. D., O’Meara, T. J., & Tovey, E. R.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-11
Volume
106
Issue
5
Pages
874-879
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125851060
Cited by
106
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
house dust mite allergens, Fel d 1, cat allergen, clothing, allergen transfer, occupational exposure, indoor air quality
MeSH terms
Allergens, Animals, Cats, Clothing, Dust, Housing, Humans, Mites, Workplace, Inhalation Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review