Cited by 15Urban Transport and AccessibilityUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisTransportation Planning and Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Energy Expenditure Approach for Estimating Walking Distance

Hsu, Chaug-Ing, Tsai, Yau-Ching·2014·Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

Abstract

A walking distance of approximately a quarter mile is normally used as an estimate of willingness to walk when planning a pedestrian-related infrastructure. However, there are variations in walking distance across pedestrian environments, yet there is scant empirical literature on the subject. In this study we propose an energy-based approach to aid the planner in establishing reasonable walking distances while taking into account the effect of pedestrian environment quality. The Pandolf et al model (Pandolf et al, 1977 Journal of Application Physiology 44 577–581) is used to analyze the walking energy expenditure (WEE). The terrain factor is adjusted using the calibrated regression function to fit the urban street space in the experiment. A goodness-of-fit test for the 385 WEEs surveyed suggests a gamma distribution. Using the isoenergy curves, walking distances are shown according to energy level, street type, and gender in order to improve the traditional single measure. The results of this study suggest that, instead of a concentric pattern, the pattern of accessible walking distance around a service facility should be designed based on the service contour lines which take into account the different pedestrian environments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1068/b37169

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Clifton K, Krizek K, 2004, “The utility of the NHTS in understanding bicycle and pedestrian travel” The National Household Travel Survey Conference: Understanding Our Nation's Travel, http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/conferences/nhts/Krizek.pdf
  2. Fruin J J, 1971, Pedestrian Planning and Designing
  3. Gehl J, 2001, Life between Buildings
  4. Howard E, 1902, Garden Cities of Tomorrow
  5. Lynch K, 1984, Site Planning
  6. Marshall S, 2005, Street and Patterns
  7. Perry C A, 1929, Neighborhood and Community Planning Volume 7 of Regional Survey of New York and its Environs
  8. Taipei City Government, 2009, A Statistical Summary for Districts in Taipei City
  9. Untermann R K, 1984, Accommodating Pedestrians

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hsu, C.-I., & Tsai, Y.-C.
Affiliations
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
  • Department of Transportation Technology and Management, National Chiao Tung University, 1001 Ta Hsueh Road, Hsinchu City, Taiwan 30010, Republic of China
Corresponding author
Hsu, Chaug-Ing
Venue
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design
Published
2014-04
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
289-306
ISSN
  • 0265-8135 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-3417
OpenAlex
W1982690443
Cited by
15
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environment and Planning B Planning and Design (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
walking distance, energy cost of walking, urban street space, terrain factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review