The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Nature That Capital Can See: Science, State, and Market in the Commodification of Ecosystem Services
Abstract
The development of stable markets in ecosystem services is now a major neoliberal policy initiative in the United States and elsewhere. Such markets, however, require ecosystem scientists to play a new and challenging role in certifying the value of the commodities traded, which are defined using the holistic measures of ecology rather than the uncontroversial measures of weight, volume, or time. As ecosystem science increasingly serves as a metrical technology for the commodification of ecosystem services, its fine and fragile distinctions increasingly bear the weight of capital circulation. In this paper I report on fieldwork among ecosystem assessment technicians, and suggest that this new round of the commodification of nature may overwhelm the capacity of science to provide stable representations of commodity value. The methods and techniques of ecosystem assessment must describe a nature that capital can ‘see’—that has an uncontroversial measure—in order for trade to occur. However, these assessment methods currently produce unstable data that are rendered meaningful in economic terms only by dint of creative and ad hoc efforts at translation by field technicians. It is suggested that this may represent a practical limit or crisis point in the expansion of capital relations, or at least a complication in the streamlined neoliberal narratives about the commodification of ecosystem services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019003001 · Cited by 10,847
Capital: A Critique of Political Economy
(2020) · On Violence · doi:10.1515/9780822390169-009 · Cited by 9,870
Selections from the Prison Notebooks
GRAMSCI, A. (2007) · On Violence · doi:10.2307/j.ctv120qr2d.14 · Cited by 6,400
Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems
Pharo, E., & Daily, G. C. (1998) · The Bryologist · doi:10.2307/3244191 · Cited by 5,261
Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies
Casper, M. J., & Latour, B. (2000) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655272 · Cited by 5,049
Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00247 · Cited by 3,670
Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1499 · Cited by 2,619
Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West.
Nash, R. F., & Cronon, W. (1992) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2164941 · Cited by 1,862
Logan, J. R. (1987) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1962053 · Cited by 1,663
Biagioli, M., & Galison, P. L. (1999) · Cited by 1,236
Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism
McCarthy, J., & Prudham, S. (2004) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.003 · Cited by 1,033
Narodny, L., Luhmann, N., & Bednarz, J. (1991) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1575589 · Cited by 1,002
Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life
Matthews, J. R. (1996) · Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6696(199607)32:3<241::aid-jhbs6>3.0.co;2-x · Cited by 989
LIBERATION ECOLOGIES: Environment, development, social movements
(1996) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203286784 · Cited by 906
Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space
Smith, N. (2008) · doi:10.1353/book11443 · Cited by 844
Selling Nature to save It? Biodiversity and Green Developmentalism
McAfee, K. (1999) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d170133 · Cited by 753
When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico
Hayden, C. (2006) · Journal of Latin American Anthropology · doi:10.1525/jlat.2006.11.2.449 · Cited by 744
Robertson, M. M. (2004) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.06.002 · Cited by 497
Self-citationMiller, C. (2001) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224390102600405 · Cited by 450
Buried Epistemologies: The Politics of Nature in (Post)colonial British Columbia
Braun, B. W. (1997) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00039 · Cited by 406
The struggle for water: politics, rationality, and identity in the American Southwest
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3634 · Cited by 298
Rules of Privatization: Contradictions in Neoliberal Regulation of North Pacific Fisheries
Mansfield, B. (2004) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00414.x · Cited by 237
Trading the Genome: Investigating the Commodification of Bio-Information
Parry, B. (2004) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/parr12174 · Cited by 212
(2002) · Liberation Ecologies · doi:10.4324/9780203032923-4 · Cited by 212
Nature and the Marketplace: Capturing the Value of Ecosystem Services
Isaacs, J. C. (2001) · Electronic Green Journal · doi:10.5070/g311510446 · Cited by 190
Demeritt, D. (2001) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d294 · Cited by 165
Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act
National Research Council (2001) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/10134 · Cited by 157
Is Capitalism Sustainable? Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology
Lane, R. E., & O’Connor, M. (1995) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791899 · Cited by 135
Niklas Luhmann's Modernity: The Paradoxes of Differentiation
Holub, R. C., & Rasch, W. (2001) · German Studies Review · doi:10.2307/1433458 · Cited by 118
Functional Ecosystems and Biodiversity Buzzwords
Goldstein, P. Z. (1999) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002247.x · Cited by 101
California’s Golden Road to Riches: Natural Resources and Regional Capitalism, 1848 – 1940
WALKER, R. A. (2001) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00238 · Cited by 100
Capitalism, Democracy, and Ecology: Departing from Marx
Rudy, A. P., & Luke, T. W. (2001) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2655424 · Cited by 90
Nature in Focus: Rapid Ecological Assessment
Roca, E., Sayre, R. G., & Sedaghatkish, G. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 79
Landscape Equivalency Analysis: Methodology for Estimating Spatially Explicit Biodiversity Credits
Bruggeman, D. J., Jones, M. L., Frank Lupi, B., & Scribner, K. T. (2005) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0239-y · Cited by 79
Daly, H. (1997) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(97)00074-8 · Cited by 68
Cited by
Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data
Thatcher, J., O’Sullivan, D., & Mahmoudi, D. (2016) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1177/0263775816633195 · Cited by 512
The Politics of Sustainability and Development
Scoones, I. (2016) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039 · Cited by 308
Designer Ecosystems: Incorporating Design Approaches into Applied Ecology
Ross, M. R. V., Bernhardt, E. S., Doyle, M. W., & Heffernan, J. B. (2015) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-121012-100957 · Cited by 52
Computational parasites and hydropower: A political ecology of Bitcoin mining on the Columbia River
Lally, N., Kay, K., & Thatcher, J. (2022) · Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/2514848619867608 · Cited by 43
Introduction: Accumulation by restoration and political ecologies of repair
Huff, A., & Brock, A. (2023) · Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486231168393 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Robertson, M. M.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-387
- ISSN
- 0263-7758 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3433
- OpenAlex
- W2161809738
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.