Cited by 52Sustainable Design and DevelopmentUrban Planning and Landscape DesignEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics

Designer Ecosystems: Incorporating Design Approaches into Applied Ecology

Ross, Matthew R.V., Bernhardt, Emily S., Doyle, Martin W., Heffernan, James B.·2015·Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Abstract

To satisfy a growing population, much of Earth's surface has been designed to suit humanity's needs. Although these ecosystem designs have improved human welfare, they have also produced significant negative environmental impacts, which applied ecology as a field has attempted to address and solve. Many of the failures in applied ecology to achieve this goal of reducing negative environmental impacts are design failures, not failures in the science. Here, we review (a) how humans have designed much of Earth's surface, (b) the history of design ideas in ecology and the philosophical and practical critiques of these ideas, (c) design as a conceptual process, (d) how changing approaches and goals in subfields of applied ecology reflect changes and failures in design, and (e) why it is important not only for ecologists to encourage design fields to incorporate ecology into their practice but also for design to be more thoroughly incorporated into ours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-environ-121012-100957

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers have an opportunity to positively influence ditch design, use, and management.

    “Given that people will continue to construct and maintain ditches, we as researchers have an opportunity to positively influence their design, use, and management 26 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

  • Ditches will require ongoing adaptive management.

    “Therefore, ditches will require ongoing adaptive management 26 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross, M. R. V., Bernhardt, E. S., Doyle, M. W., & Heffernan, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College (CA)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Published
2015-11-04
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
419-443
ISSN
  • 1543-5938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2050
OpenAlex
W2159007659
Cited by
52
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Environment and Resources (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
applied ecology, ecosystem design, design failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review