The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty
Abstract
Averageness and symmetry are attractive in Western faces and are good candidates for biologically based standards of beauty. A hallmark of such standards is that they are shared across cultures. We examined whether facial averageness and symmetry are attractive in non-Western cultures. Increasing the averageness of individual faces, by warping those faces towards an averaged composite of the same race and sex, increased the attractiveness of both Chinese (experiment 1) and Japanese (experiment 2) faces, for Chinese and Japanese participants, respectively. Decreasing averageness by moving the faces away from an average shape decreased attractiveness. We also manipulated the symmetry of Japanese faces by blending each original face with its mirror image to create perfectly symmetric versions. Japanese raters preferred the perfectly symmetric versions to the original faces (experiment 2). These findings show that preferences for facial averageness and symmetry are not restricted to Western cultures, consistent with the view that they are biologically based. Interestingly, it made little difference whether averageness was manipulated by using own-race or other-race averaged composites and there was no preference for own-race averaged composites over other-race or mixed-race composites (experiment 1). We discuss the implications of these results for understanding what makes average faces attractive. We also discuss some limitations of our studies, and consider other lines of converging evidence that may help determine whether preferences for average and symmetric faces are biologically based.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390 · Cited by 2,429
Visual Following and Pattern Discrimination of Face-like Stimuli by Newborn Infants
Goren, C. C., Sarty, M., & Wu, P. Y. K. (1975) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.56.4.544 · Cited by 1,158 · cited 1×
“…the central tendency of a population of seen faces (Walton and Bower 1993), combined with a bias to fixate face-like patterns in the environment (Goren et al 1975; Johnson et al 1991; Valenza (5) Although early emergence of a preference may indicate a biological basis, biologically based…”
BackgroundGrammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233 · Cited by 1,110
Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive
Rhodes, G., Hickford, C., & Jeffery, L. (2000) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712600161718 · Cited by 226 · cited 1×
“A few extreme traits may be more attractive than average onesöeg feminised traits (Perrett et al 1998; Rhodes et al 2000), neotonous traits (Zebrowitz 1997)öbut average facial configurations are still more attractive than most faces, and this preference must be explained.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces
MacDorman, K. F., Green, R. D., Ho, C.-C., & Koch, C. T. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026 · Cited by 533
Kätsyri, J., Förger, K., Mäkäräinen, M., & Takala, T. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00390 · Cited by 500
Physical Attractiveness and Health in Western Societies: A Review.
Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.635 · Cited by 301
Valentine, T., Darling, S., & Donnelly, M. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196599 · Cited by 147
Seeing Dogs: Human Preferences for Dog Physical Attributes
Hecht, J., & Horowitz, A. (2015) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/089279315x14129350722217 · Cited by 63
The uncanny valley does not interfere with level-1 visual perspective taking
MacDorman, K. F., Srinivas, P., & Patel, H. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.051 · Cited by 37
Demographic and Sociocultural Predictors of Face Image Satisfaction: The U.S. Body Project I
Frederick, D. A., Reynolds, T. A., Barrera, C. A., & Murray, S. B. (2022) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.01.016 · Cited by 37
Agthe, M., Strobel, M., Spörrle, M., Pfundmair, M., & Maner, J. K. (2016) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/1474704916653968 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Clark, A., Lee, K., McKay, R., & Akamatsu, S.
- Venue
- Perception
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 611-625
- ISSN
- 0301-0066 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4233
- OpenAlex
- W1965398153
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.